PPT-Efficient reasoning in

PAC Semantics Brendan Juba Harvard University Outline What is PAC Semantics Validating rules of thumb part 1 Models of partial information Utilizing partial information validating rules of thumb part 2. P(. A . &. B. ) . = . P(. A. |. B. ) * P(. B. ). Product Rule:. Bayesian Reasoning. P(. A . &. B. ) . = . P(. A. |. B. ) * P(. B. ). Product Rule:. Shorthand for . . P(A=true & B=true) = P(A=true | B=true) * P(B=true). - Charles Sanders Peirce. Using Models of Reasoning. A Return to Logos. Reasoning from Specific Instances. Progressing from a number of particular facts to a general conclusion. .. This is also known as inductive reasoning.. Rebecca Wulf. Ivy Tech Lafayette. rwulf@ivytech.edu. . Ben Markham. Ivy Tech Bloomington. bmarkham@ivytech.edu. . Sharon Koch. Ivy Tech Gary. s. koch12@ivytech.edu. . Ivy Tech Community College. 30 . Using . MapReduce. Jacopo . Urbani. , Spyros . Kotoulas. ,. Eyal. Oren, and Frank van . Harmelen. Department of Computer Science,. Vrije. . Universiteit. Amsterdam,. The Netherlands . . . Online Class by. Satyadhar. Joshi. shivgan3@yahoo.com. http://www.wiziq.com/shivgan_joshi. http://onlineclasses.nanotechbiz.org. Introduction. This class is will introduce with the subject of the overall series which is divided in 12 lectures. . After Four years of CER . in the . Classroom. Laura Rossier. F. A. Day Middle School. 8. th. grade Earth & Space Science. laura_rossier@newton.k12.ma.us. What’s your CER experience?. How many have never heard of CER?. (in the light of end of Primary Statutory Assessments….). Jo Lees : . jlees6@aol.com. Before we start……Lots of ideas taken from:. Nrich; NCETM; MNP; MA; ATM (Thinkers book); TTS; STA; Jo Boaler and Mike Askew. Pavle. . Valerjev. Department of psychology. University of . Zadar. Thinking. Psychology of thinking. Reasoning. Problem solving. Judgment and decision making. Undirected thinking (Gilhooly, 1996). Cognitive approach: Thinking as . :. . It’s not just for geometry anymore. Denisse. R. Thompson. University of South Florida, USA. 2011 Annual Mathematics Teachers Conference. Singapore. June 2, 2011. “Reasoning mathematically is a habit of mind, and like all habits, it must be developed through consistent use in many contexts.” . Jan Pettersen Nytun, UIA. 1. JPN, UiA. 2. What is a rule?. Consist of premise . and a . conclusion.. Meaning: In . any situation where the premise applies the conclusion must also hold.. JPN, UiA. 3. - Charles Sanders Peirce. On the Radar. Researching the Persuasive Speech Assignment. Due Wednesday on . WebCT. (by 11:59 p.m.). Exam Two. This Friday in Lecture. Study Guide on Course Website. Workshops for the Persuasive Speech. Reasoning and Proof Geometry Chapter 2 This Slideshow was developed to accompany the textbook Larson Geometry By Larson , R., Boswell, L., Kanold , T. D., & Stiff, L. 2011 Holt McDougal Some examples and diagrams are taken from the textbook. Developing a reasoning classroom Written by Tim Handley (Mathematics Specialist Teacher, NCETM Professional Development Lead and author of Problem Solving and Reasoning ) Aims Understand what reasoning ‘is’ and why Programming tools. cse331-staff@cs.washington.edu. . s. lides borrowed and adapted from Alex . Mariakis. . and CSE 390a . Outline. Reasoning about code. Developer tools. Eclipse and Java versions. ssh.