PDF-1THE CONTROVERSY AND THE BROADER ISSUES AT STAKE
Author : tatyana-admore | Published Date : 2016-06-04
At first glance the Yanomami controversy might be perceived as being focusednalist Patrick Tierney against James Neel a worldfamous geneticist andapoleon Chagnon
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1THE CONTROVERSY AND THE BROADER ISSUES ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1THE CONTROVERSY AND THE BROADER ISSUES AT STAKE: Transcript
At first glance the Yanomami controversy might be perceived as being focusednalist Patrick Tierney against James Neel a worldfamous geneticist andapoleon Chagnon a prominent anthropologist regar. macroeconomic forecast underlying the CBO baseline Sally Bond. Assistant Director of Research Development Services. Proposal Coordination. Office of the Vice President for Research. 2. Grant Writing Services at Purdue. Large and Small Proposal Development. September 30th and . October 2nd, 2014. Writing the NSF GRFP. Marianne Smith, Ph.D.. Research Development Officer. Ayala School of Biological Sciences. mrsmith1@uci.edu. GRFP Fellowship Application Components. Kevin . Niemi. , U. Wisconsin-Madison. Kemi Jona, Northwestern U.. Jane . Horwitz. , U. . Penn. www.broaderimpacts.net. . . @. NA4BI. This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grants MCB-1408736, MCB-1313197, and IIA-1437105. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, and/or . Wanda E. . Ward. Office of International and Integrative Activities (IIA). CONTEXT. 2014 - 2018 Strategic Plan. Mission. …to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense…. BIRDS. Jeannette M. Wing. Assistant Director for Computer and Information Science and Engineering. National Science Foundation. June 22, 2010. Why Are You Here?. Three CISE Committee of Visitors reports, one per division, in 2009. . IB-ACL-07722 1Design philosophy426373.1The camera body73.1.1The bloop generator113.1.2Output signals123.1.3Synchronising the camera to the tape recorder123.2The magazine133.3The motor143.4The battery1 FIE 2009: Special Session. Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech. Karl Smith, Purdue University/U of MN. Introduce Constructive Academic Controversy (CAC) ~ 15 min. Actively Participate in CAC ~60 min. Topic: . Issues at Stake By Jack M. Mintz *Prepared for an International Tax Conference on the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, sponsored by the German Federal ZEW and Max-Planck-Institute for Intell By: Marti Goehringer. Controversial issues discussion. A controversial issues discussion is defined as reflective dialogue among students, or between students and teachers, about an issue on which there is disagreement. Typically a discussion is sparked by a question or assertion made either by a student or teacher. The ensuing dialogue then allows for the presentation of supportive evidence, comments, and the expression of differing points of view. Discussion is therefore, by nature, an interactive endeavor, and reflective dialogue engenders listening and responding to ideas expressed by one's peers.. The Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning. Lilly Teaching Seminar. Michigan State University. April 11, . 2013. Karl A. Smith. STEM Education Center / . Technological Leadership Institute. /. . Civil . Idaho Falls Bishops’ . Storehouse. 2016-04-17. The Role of the Church. Before an Emergency. Encourage and assist membership to prepare. Plan and practice. During an Emergency. Assist civil authorities as requested. Stem cell research is headline news. Researchers are eager to move forward, state governments and private foundations are rushing to support it, and the sick and afflicted are desperate for its benefits. Yet powerful forces in our society — led by President George W. Bush — find it morally troubling and they are doing all in their powers to restrict its development beyond a very limited scale.Stem cells, which have the remarkable potential to develop into different parts of the body, are actually harvested from aborted fetal tissue or newly fertilized cells. Proponents of stem cell research argue that scientists are making legitimate use of already aborted fetuses and it is unfair to deprive those who are suffering the benefits of a potentially revolutionary therapy. Yet this practice has raised sharp criticisms from the Religious Right, who charge that science is capitalizing on an abhorrent procedure. Given the medical potential for treatment of incurable diseases by stem cell research, as well as the moral dilemmas this technology poses, should such research be permitted? What moral, religious, or political objections might be raised?Philosophers Michael Ruse and Christopher A. Pynes have compiled this valuable, up-to-date, and newly revised collection of articles by noted experts to address all aspects of the stem cell controversy. The contributors — scientists, medical practitioners, philosophers, theologians, historians, and policy analysts — offer a variety of perspectives to give readers the critical tools they need to shape an informed position on the topic. Readers will come away with a deeper understanding of the science of stem cell research, its medical cures and promises, and the moral, religious, and policy concerns surrounding this controversial social issue. Stem cell research is headline news. Researchers are eager to move forward, state governments and private foundations are rushing to support it, and the sick and afflicted are desperate for its benefits. Yet powerful forces in our society — led by President George W. Bush — find it morally troubling and they are doing all in their powers to restrict its development beyond a very limited scale.Stem cells, which have the remarkable potential to develop into different parts of the body, are actually harvested from aborted fetal tissue or newly fertilized cells. Proponents of stem cell research argue that scientists are making legitimate use of already aborted fetuses and it is unfair to deprive those who are suffering the benefits of a potentially revolutionary therapy. Yet this practice has raised sharp criticisms from the Religious Right, who charge that science is capitalizing on an abhorrent procedure. Given the medical potential for treatment of incurable diseases by stem cell research, as well as the moral dilemmas this technology poses, should such research be permitted? What moral, religious, or political objections might be raised?Philosophers Michael Ruse and Christopher A. Pynes have compiled this valuable, up-to-date, and newly revised collection of articles by noted experts to address all aspects of the stem cell controversy. The contributors — scientists, medical practitioners, philosophers, theologians, historians, and policy analysts — offer a variety of perspectives to give readers the critical tools they need to shape an informed position on the topic. Readers will come away with a deeper understanding of the science of stem cell research, its medical cures and promises, and the moral, religious, and policy concerns surrounding this controversial social issue.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"1THE CONTROVERSY AND THE BROADER ISSUES AT STAKE"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents