PPT-Academic Program Assessment in the Department of Anthropolo

I Randolph Daniel Jr Department of Anthropology East Carolina University Email danieliecuedu Abstract Academic program assessment has been ongoing in the Department of Anthropology at East Carolina University for the past several years The BA institutional learning outcome personal growth results for AY 2010 2011 and 2011 2012 are compared Results indicate that a majority of our majors have experienced personal growth with respect to an . And What You Should Know to Stay Ahead of the Curve. Presented by. De Juana “De J.” . Lozada. . Texas Higher Education Journal. September 2012. FUNCTION. Academic Advising Structures. Faculty. Professional Staff. 2016. You who choose to lead must follow,. But if you fall, you fall alone.. If you should stand, then who’s to guide you?. Robert Hunter. Role of the department head. Budget fundamentals . Faculty positions. 1. Overall Assessment. Last Year. This Year. Academic. P. P. Military. P. P. Moral-Ethical. P. P. Physical Fitness. P. P. 2. Academic Assessment. P. Strengths. We have a conducive environment for studying. November 12, 2013. Goals . Learn about the school-wide vocabulary initiative at Wood Oaks. Explain Tier 2 Academic Vocabulary. Share the District 27 model for explicit vocabulary instruction. Develop department vocabulary words to be used in the school-wide vocabulary program. SACSCOC Annual Conference . December, 2016. Timothy S. Brophy. . –Professor and Director, Institutional Assessment, Office of the Provost. Margaret Fields – Associate Dean, College. of . Liberal Arts and Sciences. Internationa. l Accelerator Program. Who are these students?. Why are we recruiting them?. What is their first year like?. How do they integrate into their majors?. Academic or Extended Accelerator Program. A . Systemic . Approach. Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment. University of Florida Office of the Provost. Today’s Goals. Describe and explain assessment systems. Review UF’s program assessment components. Why UIS Conducts Program Reviews. To identify and analyze program strengths and areas of concern. To identify ways to improve the overall quality and productivity of programs. To comply with Illinois Board of Higher Education (IBHE) requirements. 2015. Overall Assessment. Last Year. This Year. Academic. T. Military. P. Moral-Ethical. T. Physical Fitness. P. Academic Assessment. T. Strengths. Highest GPA in 4. th. Battalion. Tutoring Program. 1. April 2016. DUTY, PRIDE,HONOR. Overall Assessment. 2. Last Year. This Year. Academic. P. T. (#2 in Corps). Military. P. T. Moral-Ethical. P. T. Physical Fitness. P. P. Academic Assessment. Assessment: Trained. ”. ABOUT NBA. Established in the year 1994 under Section 10 . (u. ) of . AICTE . Act.. NBA became Autonomous in January 2010 and in . April 2013 the Memorandum of Association and Rules of NBA were amended to make it completely independent of AICTE, administratively as well as financially. . Tuesday, April 21, 2015. Carolyn . Blattner. (UCAE) . & Elena Payne-Wiens (. CoAA. ). Goals. Discuss basic principles of assessment of advising. Consider tools for assessment. Review current UNC Charlotte academic advising . 2023-24 Cycle. Program Review Basics. Rationale for Academic Program Review. BOG Regulation 8.015. . requires reviews of all academic degree programs by CIP code and degree program level at least once every seven years.. May 30, 2015. Funding . Panel . Members. Eddy Lang, Chair. Jim Christenson, Leadership Working Group Chair. Ian Stiell, Academic Section Executive Chair. Claude Topping. Francois Belanger. Marc . Afilalo.