Megan Lowe Reference Librarian Session Overview Survey of Current Attitudes How Do You Feel About Web Research Evaluating Websites A Selection of Credible Websites and how to find more ID: 182889
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Not getting caught in the web: Credible ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Not getting caught in the web: Credible sources on the web
Megan Lowe, Coordinator of Public ServicesSlide2
Session Overview
Survey of Current AttitudesHow Do You Feel About Web + Research?Evaluating Websites
A Selection of Credible Websites…and how to find more!Q & AFeedbackHow Do Feel About Web + Research NOW?Slide3
Survey of Attitudes - Before
Do you currently allow students to use Internet resources in research assignments?If no, why not?
If yes, are there any restrictions?As in: no Wikipedia, no .coms, etc.?Do you already have a list of sites you permit?
Do you have to approve Internet resources?
Or can they use anything, as long as they document correctly?
Do you use the Internet for research?Slide4
Students and the Internet
Most of us don’t trust students to use the Internet because the students DON’TRecognize the
importance of authorityCritically assess resources for scholarlinessUnderstand the
research process
Realize the
dangers inherent to the Internet
Understand bias and the
need for objectivity
Comprehend the
provenance of ideas and conceptsSlide5
You and Your Students
I’m not going to tell you that you should let your students use the Internet for research
I’m here to equip you with resources so you can equip your students as you see fit
There are
two ways
to approach equipping your students with regard to using the Internet for research, if you are inclined to do soSlide6
Students and the Internet: Way #1
The method you use really depends on how much confidence you have in your students – and that might change semester to semester, or even class to class in a given semester
If you have a group of students you have confidence in, then one approach would be to let them use the Internet,
provided they carefully evaluate the websites they encounterSlide7
Way #1: Evaluating Websites
There is a simplified list of criteria that students can use to assess websites
These criteria are based on features inherent to what we would recognize as
scholarly resources
But they are generalized to account for the
gray areas
that occur in resources on the Web,
since publishing on the Web isn’t regulated in a meaningful way
(beyond legally speaking)Slide8
Evaluating Websites: Criteria
Accuracy – is the information verifiable in other, independent resources?
Authority – what are the credentials of the author(s) or organization(s)?Coverage – how in-depth is the resource? What is its scope?
Currency
– how old is the information itself? How old is the resource?
Objectivity
– is there an obvious bias involved?Slide9
Students and the Internet: Way #2
If you do not trust a group of students to effectively evaluate websites, then it may be easier to simply restrict them to certain resources
The next section of this presentation will cover several sites where students can find scholarly informationThe sites either serve as
portals to info
or
provide info directlySlide10
Way #2: Portals to Info
Portals don’t produce the info themselves; they usually serve as aggregators, providing organized lists of resources
Some of the best are created by institutions of higher learning, professional organizations, and even librarians (not that I am biased or anything)
Often times, one
doesn’t have to go far
to find
good portals for websitesSlide11
Portals to Info: Close to Home
All of the full-time reference librarians at ULM have created subject guides for the departments they serve as liaisons
They have vetted the resources they’ve listed on their sites, so you know
you can trust them
These subject guides can be
accessed from the Library’s home page
or through the
individual pages of the librariansSlide12Slide13
These subject guides are not standardized; they don’t all contain the same information or look the same.
But all of them contain websites that have been vetted by the librarian responsible for the guide.
The Pharmacy/Health Sciences listing is separate.
http://www.ulm.edu/library/subjectguide.htmlSlide14
Keep scrolling – every department is covered!Slide15Slide16
Most of these are either created by or associated with universities or libraries.Slide17
Portals to Info: The BUBL
The BUBL describes itself as “an Internet-based information service for the UK higher education community
”As of April 2011 it is no longer being updated unfortunately, but it will be maintained
It covers
all academic subject areas
using
the Dewey Decimal System
It was created and is maintained by the
Centre for Digital Library Research
of
University of
Strathclyde
-GlasgowSlide18
http://bubl.ac.uk/Slide19
ipl2: Information You Can Trust
ipl2 is the result of the merger of the Internet Public Library and the Librarians’ Internet IndexIt is hosted by Drexel University’s College of Information Science & Technology
A consortium of colleges and universities with information science programs comprise the entity responsible for developing and maintaining ipl2Slide20
http://www.ipl.org/Slide21
Voice of the Shuttle: VoS
VoS began in 1994 as a static collection of links and has evolved into
a searchable database of resourcesIt covers all academic subject areas (and then some!)
It is also a
wonderful resource for faculty and scholars in general
, offering links to resources on academia, conferences, and related concerns
It is affiliated with the
University of California, Santa Barbara, English DepartmentSlide22
http://vos.ucsb.edu/Slide23
Aggregators: Similar to Databases
Technically, the portals themselves are also aggregators, in the sense that they
pull together multiple resources for the researcherBut the resources we’re about to see don’t list resources like the portals – the user simply inputs keywords, and
the resources return results, like a database or an Internet search engine
…AND the results are
scholarly
, and oftentimes
periodical articles
NOT websitesSlide24
Google Scholar
Google Scholar is a specialized Google search engine that focuses on
scholarly documents (NOT sites)It features books and periodical articles
There’s no guarantee of full-text for a result, but it does clearly
display when full-text is available
It even indicates when a result is from a database like JSTOR, and
if the searcher has valid access to the database, it’ll link the searcher to the articleSlide25
http://scholar.google.com/Slide26
INFOMINE
Infomine calls itself “a virtual library of Internet resources relevant to faculty, students, and research staff at the university level
”It was built and is maintained by librarians from a variety of universities and colleges from around the nationIt draws from “
databases, electronic journals, electronic books, bulletin boards, mailing lists, online library card catalogs, articles, directories of researchers, and many other types of information
”
http://infomine.ucr.edu/Slide27
http://infomine.ucr.edu/Slide28
Something a Little Different: DOAJ
DOAJ, or the Directory of Open Access Journals, serves as portal to vetted scholarly (peer-reviewed), open-access journals
It covers all disciplinesIt’s all
FREE
, though some journals may require you to create an account (which is also free) for access
It updates constantly
, as new journals are added
Many of them are
in English or offer English translations
of their contents
http://www.doaj.org/Slide29Slide30
Something Else: Open J-Gate
Open J-Gate is like the DOAJ:
it has similar aims and goals, is global, and updated every day¾ of their journals are peer-reviewed, scholarly journals
; they offer professional/industry journals, which toe the scholarly line
It indexes “
8959 open access journals, with links to full text
”
It offers
article-level searching and subject-browsing
http://www.openj-gate.comSlide31
http://www.openj-gate.com/Slide32
The White Elephant: Wikipedia
Wikipedia is simultaneously
one of the most useful tools I’ve ever encountered and one of the most frustrating
It has its
uses in the context of research
, but in an
indirect way
Wikipedia
content is good for a crash course
in basic concepts, ideas, biographies, etc. –
getting acquainted with the basics
The
real treasures
of Wikipedia are the
notes, references, and external linksSlide33
Good for a crash course, but it’s not a replacement for a real understanding of the topic. But this can help students quickly
orient themselves contextually.
Many of these are legitimate websites, and they are linked and ready for access. Where they aren’t available on the web, researchers can still get references to look up, such as the books.
Several of these are from Ole Miss, Facts on File, or other respectable .org sites.
More references researchers can check against library holdings or request through Interlibrary Loan.
Many of these are legitimate websites, and they are linked and ready for access. Where they aren’t available on the web, researchers can still get references to look up, such as the books.
Several of these are from Ole Miss, scholarly journals, and other .
edu
sites.Slide34
Final Comments on Wikipedia
If you let your students use Wikipedia, be clear –
say they can use it to get to resources via notes, references, and external links, but not the content itself
Wikipedia is also good for connecting researchers with public domain documents
, including often-studied literary, historical, and scientific textsSlide35
Final Comments on Wikipedia
And let me be clear: I’m NOT saying you should let your students use Wikipedia…
But I think there are ought to be a more universal attitude with regards to whether it should be allowed, at least within departments
Students get
mixed messages
when one professor says it’s okay to use, and another say it’s not, and then others take the indirect approachSlide36
Q & ASlide37
Survey of Attitudes - After
Will you feel more comfortable about letting students use the Internet for research now?
If no, what doubts or concerns remain?If yes, on what terms?With evaluation frameworkList of permitted websites
Must approve sites
Will this session affect how you do research on the Internet?Slide38
Not Getting Caught in the Web
Presentation URL
http://www.ulm.edu/~lowe/crediblewebsites.pptxSites Mentioned in This PresentationThe BUBL - http://bubl.ac.uk/
ipl2: Information You Can Trust -
http://www.ipl.org/
Voice of the Shuttle -
http://vos.ucsb.edu/
Infomine -
http://infomine.ucr.edu/
Directory of Open Access Journals -
http://www.doaj.org/
Open J-Gate -
http://www.openj-gate.com
My Contact
http://www.ulm.edu/~lowe
lowe@ulm.edu
Slide39
If the reference librarians can help you in any way, please don’t hesitate to call on us!
Thanks for Attending!