PROCESS FOR TEACHER EVALUATION AND ACADEMIC WORKLOAD J Sanchez 12 A Badillo Milian 3 H Chagolla 3 A Mora 1 3 J Nieto Miranda 4 1 Tecnológico Nacional de México ID: 276594
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "INNOVATIVE" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
INNOVATIVE PROCESS FOR TEACHER EVALUATION AND ACADEMIC WORKLOADJ. Sanchez1,2, A. Badillo-Milian3, H. Chagolla3, A. Mora1,3, J. Nieto-Miranda41Tecnológico Nacional de México (MEXICO)2Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (MEXICO)3Instituto Tecnológico de Querétaro (MEXICO) 4Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MEXICO)jonssanchez@gmail.com, amora@mail.itq.edu.mx
1Slide2
INTRODUCTIONLaw of education reform from México: authorities MUST to monitor and evaluate public education institutions and persons.Improve academic performance in general, where high productivity and competitiveness of teachers will be a fair reward ; which is not the case today.How principals or managers of Tecnológico Nacional de México (TNM) can quickly promote compliance with the obligations of teachers? A 360 evaluation: sorts the process, defines policies and / or strategies, allows us medium and long term visions.2Slide3
INTRODUCTIONHistorically, this activity has been a complex problem for different Mexican universities: The Department of Mathematics, University of Sonora reports that spend 500 hours-man to perform such programming. Universidad Diego Portales, manual processing of this activity spent around 160 man-hours.The Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California at Los Angeles, require the work of two people for 3 days, which is equivalent to 48 man-hours.In summary: every area of ITQ spend 200 man-hours: approximate cost of USD$ 3,000.00 (8 faculties). Assuming a cost of USD$ 15.00 per man-hour. 3Slide4
OBJECTIVETo design a new 360 evaluation process 360, through a system that encourages compliance with the teaching duties to enhance the academic competitiveness of TNM.4Slide5
METHODOLOGYWe took this idea from course selection process currently carried out by students. Nowadays is successfully applied in different institutes of the México.5Slide6
METHODOLOGYTable 1. Evaluation criteria and indicators.Evaluation criteria IndicatorPerformance TeachingAssessment of students survey . Evaluation of the Chief Academic.Academic
productivity
Delivered product (notes, academic memory, practices book, etc.).
Productivity I+D+i
Delivery
of
evidence
.
Labour
Duties
Good grades, bad grades, estrangements letter, letter penalties , etc.(all is based on the regulation of workers)
Compliance
with
QMS
Upload to the SII (Integrated Information System), all instrumentation of each subject course and the teaching
plannings
.
Tracking to teacher plan, to capture real dates in SII.
Capture the partial and final grades in the planned time.
6Slide7
RESULTSFigure 1. Evaluation of Performance Teacher7Slide8
RESULTSFigure 2. Pre-selection of workload for teachers8Slide9
RESULTSFigure 3. Workload selected by teachers9Slide10
RESULTSFigure 4. Workload report for principals or manager10Slide11
RESULTSAdvantages:Savings estimated of USD$ 24,000 for the Technologic of Queretaro. This means that on 257 Institutes for Technologic of Mexico, we could save a few millions of dollars.The pre-selection of workload for teacher is objective, this is made based on the overall performance of teachers.Teachers share responsibility for the proper administration of their workload.This system has a module to quick review the teacher workload.11Slide12
CONCLUSIONSContribution to the TNM: objectively evaluate teachers based on actual indicators academic. This innovation could impact on improving the competitiveness and quality of education for México.The next challenge is to demonstrate to managers that this innovation is working and it has more advantages than disadvantages. 12