Social Work History Network London 25 th May 2017 Dr Philip Whitehead Professor in criminal and social justice Teesside University What to explore in the time weve got Explore the origins of the probation system in 19 ID: 590890
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The History of Probation in the UK" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The History of Probation in the UKSocial Work History NetworkLondon 25th May 2017
Dr Philip Whitehead
Professor in criminal and social justice
Teesside UniversitySlide2
What to explore in the time we’ve gotExplore the origins of the probation system in 19th century
Conditions of existence and surface of emergence (Garland)
Always an interest in origins and wanted to write about it (
Whitehead and Statham 2006; 30 years after Bochel in 1976
) – do the job and
understand
its history, tradition, culture, and role in CJS
Tried to bring this long history up to date in
Transforming Probation
(2016)
Welcome relief to talk about history than the last 20 to 30 years of political impositions; intellectual detachment/emotion and rageSlide3
Before 1876 and the first PCM of CETSThe era of Victorian liberalism and ideology of laissez-faire individualism
19
th
c. conception of the offender – freedom and equality under the law, individual responsibility, imbued with Enlightenment reason, rational choice (the
ontology
of the human subject)
This conception was reflected in the politico-economic and ideological conditions of existence: laissez-faire capitalism, minimalist state, freedom of the individual in a market-driven society, individual choice and responsibility (ring any bells?), which justified and legitimated a penality of retribution, deterrent penal and social policies, the prison system
In other words, mid-Victorian criminal justice and penal policy meshed with a particular state formation, view of the world, ideology, belief system, understanding of human behaviour
We cannot understand criminal justice or penal and social policy unless we take account of the politico-economic conditions of existence and concepts of state, ideology, class, power. For Garland (1985)
Punishment and Welfare
to a large extent penality is structured by its political and social context; it rests on a particular platform that we can excavate and explain (
reference to Marxist theory
)Slide4
From 1880s disruption of Victorian penality(History of CJS and timescales)
CHANGES
–
a changing political and economic context; recession, poverty, deprivation, inequality, social deprivation (Booth and Rowntree surveys); arguments and need for social reform? Working class agitation, trade unions, beginnings of the labour movement. The legitimacy of the Victorian prison was also being questioned
CRISES
– changes elicited 2 related crises: a) role of the state in socio-economic issues; b) regulation, management, containment, and control of troublesome populations – the problem of order
RESPONSES
– a) social work and probation; b) social security, beginnings of welfare state and reforming liberal government 1906-14; c) positivist criminology and questioning of classicism; d) eugenics movement Slide5
ConsequencesAfter the 1880s, through to the reforming liberal government of 1906-14, we see the reordering of the political, social, economic, and criminal justice realm
This is the context within which, the conditions of existence and surface of emergence, for the emergence of the probation system between 1876 and the
Probation of Offenders Act 1907 Slide6
Victorian penal complex and sanctions Death
Penal servitude
Imprisonment
Detention in a reformatory school (industrial)
Corporal punishment -
whipping adults and birch juveniles
Release on a recognizance (
PCM after 1876, 1879, 1887)
Fine
Criminals differed from non-criminals only by the fact of lawbreaking. Voluntary action, utilitarian deeds, individual choice so that 19
th
c. penality is a mix of classical justice, deterrence, retribution and reform
.Slide7
Modern penal complex 1895-1914Extended grid of disposals:Probation
Borstal
Preventive detention
Detention in inebriate reformatory
Detention in institution for the mentally defective
Licensed supervision
Supervised fines
Notions of law, justice, deterrence, and retribution remain. But “criminals are presented as individuals to be pitied, cared for, and if possible reclaimed”
(Garland, 1985, p. 27
)Slide8
20th century and recent history – full circle?The disruption to the Victorian penal complex after 1880s ushered in what Garland describes as the
penal-welfare
complex. This era of criminal justice reached into the late-1970s and was dominated by probation and rehabilitation
But this
penal-welfare
complex was, in turn, disrupted from the 1980s: from the post-war settlement, Keynes, Attlee, Beveridge, Temple; to the new dispensation of Hayek, Friedman, Reagan, Thatcher and political ideology of neoliberal capitalism
The new conditions of existence for the erosion of probation – competition, privatisation, markets working their way into people-based organisations. To some extent a
return
to the 19
th
century liberal era – the accountant’s logic
Transformations which have damaged the quality of criminal and social justice, contingent on the erosion of probation/CJS dialectic has stalled