Trademarks A trademark is any mark which identifies the source of the wares Trademark in the US Trade mark in the UK Trademarks Trademarks are protected by The common law of passing off Passing off was once known as unfair competition ID: 243067
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Trade-marks" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Trade-marksSlide2
Trade-marks
A trade-mark is any mark which identifies the source of the wares
Trademark in the US
Trade mark in the UKSlide3
Trade-marks
Trade-marks are protected by
The common law of passing off
Passing off was once known as unfair competition
And still is in the US
The
Trade-marks Act
The Act applies only to marks which are registered
Unfair Competition Act was predecessor of Trade-Marks Act
Hence trade-marks may be registered or unregisteredSlide4
Passing Off & Trade-marks
Passing off and the
Trade-marks Act
offer very similar protection
It is very common to allege both passing off and an infringement of the TMA in the same action
Differences are procedural
Territorial extent
PO is limited to region in which the mark is actually known
TMA protection it national on registration
Establishing of reputation
PO requires reputation be established by evidence
TMA requires only use as prerequisite to registrationSlide5
Principles
Trade-marks law protects an association between a mark and the source of the wares
Contrast trade-marks with patent and copyright in which the wares themselves are protected
The operation of the market relies extensively on brands The goodwill associated with them is considered to be a most valuable form of property However, despite its connection with a product,
a mark
must not be confused with the product – it
is
something else
, a symbol of a connection between a source of a product and the product itself.
Kirkbi
v
Rivtik
SCCSlide6
Principles
Corollary
Functionality is not protected by trade-marks law
To achieve protection for functional aspects of a work, copyright or patent protection must be soughtSlide7
Principles
Why is it important to protect the association between the mark and the wares?
In many cases the quality of the wares cannot be determined by direct inspection at the time of the purchase
Only experience – and hindsight – tells the quality of the goods
Reputation is the basis of the saleSlide8
Principles
A good reputation sets up a virtuous circle
Consumers buy the manufacturer’s goods because of the reputation
The manufacturer keeps up its reputation because this leads consumers to purchase
Note that it is expensive to produce high quality wares
A good reputation allows a provider to charge commensurately more for their waresSlide9
Principles
Once the reputation is established a forger can exploit the mark by selling inferior quality goods at the same price as is commanded by the owner’s higher quality goods
The forger
could choose to offer high quality goods
But it won’t
The forger can make extraordinary profits by offering inferior goods at the same priceSlide10
Elements
Trade-marks law protects reputation by protecting the link between the source and the wares
The mark may be a manufacturer’s mark
A distributor’s mark
A retailer’s mark
A service mark
This allows the reputation of the source to develop through consumers’ experience with wares associated with the markSlide11
Elements
Because trade-marks law is aimed at protecting reputation the key element is
confusion in the mind of the consumers as to the source of the wares
The mark must be
Confusingly similar, and
Confusing as to the source of the wares
Using the mark to refer to the source of the wares is not confusing
Eg
“I own a Honda™”Slide12
“Source Theory”
This is encapsulated in the traditional “source theory”
The function of a trademark is to impart information as to the source or sponsorship of the product.
Singer Mfg Co v
Loog
(1880) 18
ChD
395Slide13
“Source Theory”
In other words, what the registered mark does nowadays is to ensure that the wares or services are the wares and services of a particular person and no one else, that is, the source of the goods is guaranteed.
United Artists Corp v Pink Panther Beauty Corp 80 CPR (3d) 247 (FCA) at 256
[T]he traditionally accepted premise that the only legally relevant function of a trademark is to impart information as to the source or sponsorship of the product.
Smith v Chanel, Inc, 402 F2d 562 (9th Cir 1968) at 566: Slide14
Source Theory
Contrast source theory with
Guarantee theory
The function of the mark is to guarantee the quality of the goods
Property theory
Ownership of the mark
Dilution theorySlide15
Ciba-Geigy v
Apotex
Gontier
J suggests that “the passing-off action is intended to protect a form of ownership”
“the passing off injures the right of property in the plaintiff, that right of property being his right to the goodwill of his business”
The suggestion that trade-marks are a form of property is dangerous, as it suggests that the owner can control
any use of the trade-mark, even those which do not cause any confusion
Eg
What’s in Jeremy’s walletSlide16
Ciba-Geigy v
Apotex
The suggestion that trade-marks law protects the property of the owner stems from the fact that the owner of the mark, not the consumer, brings the action
[
i
]t should never be overlooked that unfair competition cases are affected with a public interest. A dealer's good will is protected, not merely for his profit, but in order that the purchasing public may not be enticed into buying A's product when it wants B's product
.
Ciba-Geigy
But if the law is really about protecting the consumer, why is the T-M owner given the right of action?Slide17
Ciba-Geigy v
Apotex
The interests of the owner and the consumer are aligned when a forger uses a confusing mark
Since the owner has more at stake than any individual consumer, the owner brings the action
But the interests of the owner and the consumer are
not aligned in the case of non-confusing uses
This is when it is necessary to determine who the law is really intended to protectSlide18
Dilution and Passing Off
Trade-mark ‘dilution’ has been recognized in the US
Arises when defendant “blurs” or “tarnishes” a markSlide19
Dilution
Blurring applies to famous marks
Kodak bicycles would blur the distinctiveness of Kodak film, even without confusion
An extension of traditional source theorySlide20
Dilution
Tarnishment
Derogatory use of a mark
“Enjoy Cocaine”
Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc v Pussycat Cinema, Ltd, 604 F2d 200 (2d Cir 1979)
Plaintiff's distinctive uniform diluted by defendant's use of a similar uniform in an X-rated movie
Pillsbury Co v Milky Way Prods, Inc, 215 USPQ 124 (ND
Ga
1981)
Plaintiff's trade characters "
Poppin
" Fresh" and "
Poppie
Fresh" diluted by depiction of them engaged in sexual
acts
MTD v John Deere
John Deere lawn tractor being chased by MTD tractor
“Nothing runs like a Deere”
Much closer to property right in the mark itselfSlide21
Google
AdWords
Use in Commerce?
In Canada “sells
, distributes or advertises wares or services in association
…”
Yes
Google
France v Louis
Vuitton
, A-G ECJ Sept 2009
Rescuecom
Corp. v. Google, Inc., (2009, 2
nd
Cir.)
Confusing Use?
No – Google France
Maybe -
RescuecomSlide22
Passing Off – Elements
Despite some waffling, the traditional elements of passing off remain:
(1) A reputation
An association in the mind of the public between the mark and the source
(2) A misrepresentation leading or likely to lead to confusion in the mind of the public
(3) Damage to the plaintiffSlide23
Passing Off –
Intent
Intent to confuse is
not an element
For this reason it is sometimes said that the right is “proprietary”
This does not mean that the owner owns the mark in the sense that they can prohibit any use whatsoever of the
mark
Confusion remains a requirementSlide24
Passing Off – Elements
Intent to confuse is
not an element
For this reason it is sometimes said that the right is “proprietary”
This does
not mean that the owner owns the mark in the sense that they can prohibit any use whatsoever of the markSlide25
Trade-marks & Passing Off
Differences between registered and unregistered marks relate to
reputation
Not necessary to prove a reputation
Registration is permitted upon use
Nationwide protection
Passing off protects only in the geographical areas in which a reputation has been gained