/
Hopes for the League of Nations Hopes for the League of Nations

Hopes for the League of Nations - PowerPoint Presentation

triclin
triclin . @triclin
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-06

Hopes for the League of Nations - PPT Presentation

What does this cartoon say about what the hopes for the League of Nations were Be specific by referring directly to the cartoon Real examples from the league of nations Can YOU Resolve International Disputes ID: 799844

nations league france greece league nations greece france bulgaria 1923 japan germany italy 1919 answer case memel islands 1921

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Hopes for the League of Nations" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Hopes for the League of Nations

What does this cartoon say about what the hopes for the League of Nations were? Be specific by referring directly to the cartoon.

Slide2

Real examples from the league of nations

Can YOU Resolve International Disputes?

Slide3

CASE ONE

The Aaland Islands (1921)

Slide4

The Aaland Islands (1921)

Islands located between Sweden and FinlandFinland possessed the islands but most people wanted to be governed by Sweden

Neither could come up with a decision that pleased both sides so they asked the League of Nations to intervene

Slide5

The Aaland Islands (1921)

Do you:

Give the Island to Sweden since most people wanted to join that country

Do nothing and let Finland and Sweden settle the issue on their own

Let Finland keep the islands, but ensure that no weapons are ever placed there

Slide6

The Aaland Islands (1921)

Answer:

c) Let Finland keep the islands, but ensure that no weapons are ever placed there

Both sides accepted the decision and this remains enforce to the present day

Slide7

CASE TWO

Teschen

(1919)

Slide8

Teschen (1919)

Teschen

was a small town between Poland and Czechoslovakia.

Its main importance was that it had valuable coal mines there which both the Poles and the Czechs wanted to make their newly formed economies strong.

January 1919: Polish and

Czech troops fight in the

streets of

Teschen

.

Many died.

Slide9

Teschen (1919)

Do you:

Split the town so both the Czechs and the Poles have access to the coal

Place the town under the protection of the League of Nations to administer the coal as it seems fit

Support the Poles by sending them reinforcements; after all,

Teschen

was part of Poland

Slide10

Teschen (1919)

Answer:

Split the town so both the Czechs and the Poles have access to the coal

The League decided that the bulk of the town should go to Poland while Czechoslovakia should have one of

Teschen’s

suburbs. This suburb contained the most valuable coal mines and the Poles refused to accept this decision. Though no more wholesale violence took place, the two countries continued to argue over the issue for the next twenty years.

Slide11

CASE THREE

Upper Silesia (1921)

Slide12

Upper Silesia (1921)

The treaty that ended WWI gave the people of the region the right to a referendum in order to determine whether they wished to be part of Poland or Germany

In the vote 700,000 voted to join Germany and 500,000 opted for Poland

The close results sparked violent protests

The League was asked to settle the dispute

Slide13

Upper Silesia (1921)

Do you:

Respect the results and hand over the territory to Germany

Split the province in two parts, handing one to Germany and another to Poland

Decide to administer the region as a protectorate of the League of Nations for 2 years until another vote is held

Slide14

Upper Silesia (1921)

Answer:

b) Split the province in two parts, handing one to Germany and another to Poland

Both groups within the province and both countries involved accepted the ruling

Slide15

CASE FOUR

Memel

, Lithuania (1923)

Slide16

Memel (1923)

Memel was an area and port in Lithuania that was to be administered by the League of Nations after WWIMost people living there were Lithuanians and resented the fact that a French general was in charge of their territory

Lithuanians invaded the port and the League had to step in

Slide17

Memel (1923)

Do you:

Send in forces to squash the rebels and reinforce the League’s control over the region

Return the area of Memel to Lithuania, but keep the port as an International Zone

Cede the port and all of the Memel region to Lithuania to satisfy the desire of the population

Slide18

Memel (1923)

Answer:

Return the area of Memel to Lithuania, but keep the port as an International Zone

Lithuania accepted the decision, however how could the response of the League be viewed as a failure?

Slide19

CASE FIVE

Greece & Bulgaria (1925)

Slide20

Greece & Bulgaria (1925)

Bulgaria and Greece shared a borderIn 1925, sentries patrolling this border fired on one another and a Greek soldier was killed. The Greek army invaded Bulgaria as a result.

Slide21

Greece & Bulgaria (1925)

Do you:

Tell Greece to leave and promise Bulgaria that Greece will be punished by the League for the invasion

Send in forces to help Bulgaria defeat the Greeks

Support Greece by reprimanding Bulgaria and demanding that Bulgaria issue a public apology for the shooting

Slide22

Greece & Bulgaria (1925)

Answer:

Tell Greece to leave and promise Bulgaria that Greece will be punished by the League for the invasion

The Bulgarians asked the League for help and the League ordered both armies to stop fighting and that the Greeks should pull out of Bulgaria. The League then sent experts to the area and decided that Greece was to blame and fined her £45,000. Both nations accepted the decision.

Slide23

CASE SIX

Invasion of the Ruhr (1923)

Slide24

Invasion of the Ruhr (1923)

Germany failed to make a payment on war damages owed to Allies because they simply did not have the money.France and Belgium didn’t believe Germany and claimed it needed to be taught a lesson.

They invaded the Ruhr area, Germany’s

most important industrial region.

Slide25

Invasion of the Ruhr (1923)

Do you:

Diplomatically negotiate a new payment schedule between Germany and Belgium and France

Send troops to Germany to forcefully remove Belgium and France

Support Belgium and France because they are important League members

Slide26

Invasion of the Ruhr (1923)

Answer:

Support Belgium and France because they are important League members

Within Europe, France was seen as a senior League member – like Britain . Here were two League members clearly breaking League rules. For the League to enforce its rules, it needed the support of its major backers in Europe, particularly Britain and France. Few countries criticised what France and Belgium did.

How do you think these actions were viewed internationally?

Slide27

CASE SEVEN

Corfu (1923)

Slide28

Corfu (1923)

5 Italian surveyors, working for the League of Nations to map the unclear border between Albania and Greece, were killed on the Greek side of the border.

Mussolini

, the Italian dictator, demanded compensation from Greece.

When Greece refused,

Mussolini bombarded and

occupied Greek island of

Corfu.

Slide29

Corfu (1923)

Do you:

Support Italy by forcing Greece to pay the compensation demanded

Place economic sanctions on Italy to persuade it to leave Greece alone

Invite both sides to a conference in Switzerland to negotiate a peaceful solution

Slide30

Invasion of the Ruhr (1923)

Answer:

Support Italy by forcing Greece to pay the compensation demanded

Even though the League wanted to condemn Mussolini’s aggressive actions, France and Britain did not want to upset the new Italian dictator. Therefore, they put pressure on Greeks to accept Mussolini’s demands. Mussolini only withdrew his forces once the Greeks had apologised and paid.

Slide31

CASE EIGHT

Manchurian Crisis (1931-1933)

Slide32

Manchurian Crisis (1931-1933)

Japan invaded Manchuria, which was part of China, to expand its living space and to get more resources.

Japan already claimed special interests in the area because Japan ran the South Manchuria Railway and controlled some cities along its route.

Japan blew up a section of the Rail-

way and accused China of being

responsible for the sabotage.

China denied.

Japan invaded.

Slide33

Manchurian Crisis (1931-1933)

Do you:

Condemn Japan’s actions and order the withdrawal of troops

Send a coalition force to forcefully remove Japan from China

Impose economic sanctions to persuade Japan to hand over Manchuria

Slide34

Manchurian Crisis (1931-1933)

Answer:

Condemn Japan’s actions and order the withdrawal of troops

Japan kept Manchuria and left the League of Nations in 1933. League members did not want to impose economic sanctions because the Great Depression had already damaged the world economy too much. Britain and France did not want to use military action because they feared Japanese reprisals against their colonies in the Far East.

Slide35

CASE NINE

Abyssinian Crisis (1935-1936)

Slide36

Abyssinian Crisis (1935-1936)

Abyssinia was the only independent black African state.Italy wanted Abyssinia because it already had land along Abyssinia’s borders and because it wanted to show the world its newfound strength and power.

Italy invaded.

Slide37

Abyssinian Crisis (1935-1936)

Do you:

Give certain areas of Abyssinia in return for Italy’s withdrawal of troops

Impose economic sanctions by cutting off trade with Italy.

Offer to act as an arbitrator between Italy and Abyssinia to come to a peaceful resolution

Slide38

Abyssinian Crisis (1935-1936)

Answer:

All of the above

The League of Nations attempted all these solutions. However, non-League nations continued to trade with Italy. The economic sanctions did not include oil, coal or iron. The Abyssinian public refused to accept a concession of land to the Italians. The Italians refused to negotiate, knowing that they had military strength and that Britain and France were very reluctant to go to war again.

Italy-Ethiopia War (1935)

Slide39

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the League of Nations

Slide40

Country Membership

Had 42 founding members, but throughout its existence many members joined and left the League of Nations

Britain and France considered most powerful

 both wanted to avoid war at all costs.

Which important country was NEVER part of the League of Nations?

Member

Joined

Left

Japan

1919

March 1933

Germany

1926

October 1933

Italy

1919

December 1937

USSR

1934

December

1939

France

1919

June 1940

Britain

1919

April 1946

Slide41

Discussion Question

How do you think the effectiveness of the League of Nations was hampered by the absence of the United States?

Slide42

League of Nations Summary

After considering the examples given, what do you think was a serious weakness of the League of Nations?

What do the following cartoons tell us about the successes and/or failures of the League of Nations?

Slide43

Cartoon 1

China

Japan

Slide44

Cartoon 2

Slide45

Cartoon 3