Peter S Cahn PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs MGH Institute of Health Professions pcahnmghihpedu Learning objectives Overcome barriers to getting started on writing projects Present scientific ideas clearly ID: 162673
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Academic Writing" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Academic Writing
Peter S. Cahn, PhD
Associate Provost for Academic Affairs
MGH Institute of Health Professions
pcahn@mghihp.eduSlide2
Learning objectives
Overcome barriers to getting started on writing projects.
Present scientific ideas clearly.
Edit manuscripts to refine the argument.Slide3
Thinking about the
future
$100
June 1
$110
June 2
$100
today
$110
tomorrowSlide4
"If you wait for clouds to part and be struck with a bolt of lightning, you're likely to be waiting the rest of your life. But if you simply get going something will occur to you."Slide5
Getting started
Cover the blank screen
Write a catchy title
Build from existing work
Put headings in
Start with methodsUse voice recognition softwareWrite a letter to your motherWrite why you’re stuck
Internet Freedom
Create timetable
Block it into calendar
Touch it everyday
Reward yourself
Create a deleted fileSlide6
http://macfreedom.comSlide7
Motive
The truth isn’t what you would expect
There’s a contradiction that needs explaining
The prevailing opinion needs to be challenged or qualified
Several authorities’ published views disagree
We can learn more about a larger phenomenon by studying this smaller oneA seemingly insignificant matter is actually importantA previous tentative result has now been confirmedSlide8
http://
www.biosemantics.org/jane/Slide9Slide10
GIPSY Test
G
rabber
I
argue that…
Prove itSo what?
Y
es, butSlide11
Medical Obfuscation: Structure and Function
Most medical communications are difficult to read.
Articles were taken from the
Journal
issues dated April 4, 1974.
I identified 10 recurring faults in the Journal
articles I read.
Medical writing in general is very weak.
One might suppose a weak tone is a way of anticipating and warding off attack.
On the other hand, weak writing is hard to read.
Contrary to popular belief, there is little historical precedent for bad writing.
Of course, it is traditional for physicians to conceal their knowledge from patients, through judicious use of language.
In any case, it now appears that obligatory obfuscation is a firm tradition within the medical profession.
But it seems important to mention that the medical profession pays a price for adopting this particular form of internal discourse.
A final point concerns cross-fertilization.
In summary, medical writing is bad, but its functions are perfectly understandable.Slide12
The Bible by a Scientist
Objective
considerations of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account.
Again I saw that under the sun the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, nor bread to the wise, nor riches to the intelligent, nor favor to those with knowledge, but time and chance happen to them all.Slide13
“
Major increases in the volume of prescribing of psychotherapeutic drugs in recent years have led to increasing concern over the overconsumption and
misprescribing
of such drugs and heightened interest in the pursuit and understanding of factors that might underlie or influence rates of drug use.
”
“
Improvement in health care is based, to an important extent, on the viability of the biomedical research enterprise, whose success, in turn, depends on the availability of creative scientists and networks of institutions of excellence capable of producing research and teaching personnel of the highest quality possible.
”Slide14
March 7, 2011
Pet Peeve
How to avoid
Colloquial language
“
kind of
”
“
humongous
”
Condescending tone
“
of course
”
“
obviously
”
Confusing pronouns
“
this
”
“
these
”
Vague descriptors
“
numerous
”
“
several
”
Overstatements
“
virtually all studies have shown
”
Self-aggrandizement
“
Interesting finding
”
“
Exciting
”
Needlessly long words
“
Utilize
”
“
Approximately
”
Overly precious words
“
Elucidate
”
“
Explicate
”
Abbreviation
overload and jargonSlide15
Real Estate Ads
Fantastic
Granite
Spacious
State-of-the-art
!
Corian
Charming
Maple
Gourmet
Great neighborhood
Levitt SD and
Dubner
SJ. 2006.
Freakonomics
: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything
. New York: William Morrow.Slide16
Learning Communities
When do you find yourself procrastinating the most during a writing project?
What do you read for fun? What can you learn from nonacademic writers?
How can the members of the group hold each other accountable to their writing goals? Slide17
Source: Roberts JM. 1976.
History of the
World. New York: Knopf, p. 845.
The joker in the European pack was Italy. For a time hopes were entertained of her as a force against Germany, but these disappeared under Mussolini. In 1935 Italy made a belated attempt to participate in the scramble for Africa by invading Ethiopia. It was clearly a breach of the covenant of the League of Nations for one of its members to attack another. France and Great Britain, as great powers, Mediterranean powers, and African colonial powers, were bound to take the lead against Italy at the league. But they did so feebly and half-heartedly because they did not want to alienate a possible ally against Germany. The result was the worst possible: the league failed to check aggression, Ethiopia lost her independence, and Italy was alienated after all. Slide18
Version 1
Italy, one might say, was the joker in the European deck. When she invaded Ethiopia, it was clearly a breach of the covenant of the League of Nations; yet the efforts of England and France to take the lead against her were feeble and half-hearted. It appears that those great powers had no wish to alienate a possible ally against Hitler's rearmed Germany.Slide19
Version 2
Italy was the joker in the European deck. Under Mussolini in 1935, she made a belated attempt to participate in the scramble for Africa by invading Ethiopia. As J. M. Roberts points out, this violated the covenant of the League of Nations (Roberts, 845). But France and Britain, not wanting to alienate a possible ally against Germany, put up only feeble and half-hearted opposition to the Ethiopian adventure. The outcome, as Roberts observes, was
“
the worst possible: the league failed to check aggression, Ethiopia lost her independence, and Italy was alienated after all
”
(Roberts, 845).Slide20
Version 3
Much has been written about German rearmament and militarism in the period 1933-1939. But Germany's dominance in Europe was by no means a foregone conclusion. The fact is that the balance of power might have been tipped against Hitler if one or two things had turned out differently. Take Italy's gravitation toward an alliance with Germany. That alliance seemed so very far from inevitable that Britain and France actually muted their criticism of the Ethiopian invasion in the hope of remaining friends with Italy. They opposed the Italians in the League of Nations, as JM Roberts observes,
“
feebly and half-heartedly because they did not want to alienate a possible ally
against Germany
”
(Roberts, 845). Suppose Italy, France, and Britain had retained a certain common interest. Would Hitler have been able to get away with his remarkable bluffing and bullying in the later thirties?