distribution channels KLP Bjørvika 24112016 Line Augeli Pareto Asset Management AS Pareto Asset Management AS Konsesjoner Fondsforvaltning forvaltning av alternative investeringsfond og aktiv forvaltning ID: 592849
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "AML/CFT oversight of" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
AML/CFT oversight of distribution channels
KLP, Bjørvika 24.11.2016Line Augeli, Pareto Asset Management ASSlide2
Pareto Asset Management ASKonsesjoner: Fondsforvaltning, forvaltning av alternative investeringsfond og aktiv forvaltning.
Hovedkontor i Oslo og filial i Sverige.Eies av ansatte og Pareto AS v/Svein Støle.55 ansatte, hvorav 2 på compliance og 1 på risk.
Forvalter fond hjemmehørende i Norge, Luxembourg og Irland – totalt ca. 40 milliarder. Direktesalg og tredjeparts distribusjon.
VFF
Complianceseminar
2016
|
2Slide3
Verdipapirfondforskriften§ 2-5.Melding om
utkontrakteringVerdipapirfondforskriften Kapittel
13. Hvitvaskingsloven § 5. Risikobasert kundekontroll
CSSF Regulation 12-02
Enhanced
level
of
due
dilligence must be performed on all third party distributors. The final responsibility of AML/CFT lies with the investment funds or their management companies. Investment funds and management companies must ensure that third party distributors have AML measures in place equivalent to those in Luxembourg. Kilde: PwC Luxembourg
Norge? Europa? Luxembourg?
“AML Distributor Due Diligence: it’s not an option – it’s an obligation”
VFF Complianceseminar 2016
| 3Slide4
Companies subject to financial supervision in EU/EEA or equivalent country.
Companies subject to financial supervision in a country outside EU/EEA or equivalent country.
Companies in high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions.
Non-regulated entity i.e. introducing broker etc.
Companies in jurisdictions subject to international sanctions – sanctions must be analysed.
The company is subject to investor alerts.
The company does not engage in sub-distribution.
The company has sub-distributors within its group belongings.
The company has sub-distributors.
The company has several layers of sub-distribution.
Risk-
based
AML assessment
The Distributor Sub-Distribution
VFF Complianceseminar 2016
| 4Slide5
The Distributor has its main operations in EU/EEA or equivalent country.
The Distributor conducts business outside EU/EEA or equivalent country.
The Distributor conducts business in
high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions.
The
fund provider
does not have insight into how the Distributor operates, target markets/clients etc.
The
Distributor conduct business
in jurisdictions subject to international sanctions – sanctions must be analysed.
The Distributors type of business is considered as low risk.The fund provider has insight into how the distributor operates, and their business is of ordinary art.The fund provider does not have insight into how the distributor operates.
Risk-
based AML assessment
Place of business Type of business
VFF Complianceseminar 2016
| 5“The Distributor” includes branches, subsidiaries
and sub-distributors. Slide6
Distributor acting as nominee.
Third party nominee, which the fund provider has a close business relationship with.
Distributors
acting in its own name (fund-of-funds or the custodian of the fund).
Distributor acting in its own name as insurance undertaking.
Third party nominee.
Settlement through a bank in in EU/EEA or equivalent country.
Settlement through a bank outside EU/EEA or equivalent country.
Settlement through a bank
in high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions. Third party receivers of payment (other than Distributor in case of third party nominee).
Transactions with Shell Banks.
Risk-
based AML assessmentCustody
SettlementVFF Complianceseminar 2016
| 6Slide7
Risk-based AML assessment
Simplified assessment: All green elements.
Internal
assessment
annually
.
Standard assessment: No orange or red elements.
Internal
assessment annually. Standard Due Diligence Questionnaire is sent every 2 year.Standard plus risk assessment: No red elements.
Internal
assessment annually
. Detailed due Diligence Questionnaire is sent every year.
Enhanced risk assessment: Any red elements require clearance from compliance and CEO, unless red elements is de facto not high risk.
Internal assessment annually
. Detailed Due Diligence Questionnaire is sent every year.Any grey elements, suggests a distribution agreement should not be entered into.
Level
of
due
dilligence
VFF
Complianceseminar
2016
|
7Slide8
Vedlegg
Tilleggsinformasjon for spesielt interesserteSlide9
Sourceshttps://www.iosco.org/investor_protection/?
subsection=investor_alerts_portalhttp://www.esma.europa.eu/page/Investment-FirmsThird country equivalence (Common understanding between
Member States 2012): Australia, Brazil, Canada, Hong Kong, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Singapore, Switzerland, South Africa, The United States of America.
High-risk and non-
cooperative
jurisdictions
(FATF): Afghanistan, Bosnia Herzegovina, Democratic People’s Republic of
Korea, Iran, Iran, Lao
People’s
Democratic Republic, Syria, Uganda, Vanuatu, Yemen. Sanctions in force by EU: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/cfsp/sanctions/docs/measures_en.pdfSanctions in force by USA: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Pages/Programs.aspxInvestor alerts, third country equivalence and sanctionsSlide10
Luxembourg CSSF Regulation N 12-02
“Where the units or shares of an undertaking for collective investment or an investment company in risk capital are subscribed through an intermediary acting on behalf of his customers, the undertaking for collective investment, its management company, the investment company in risk capital or, where applicable, the respective proxy of the professionals shall put in place enhanced customer due diligence measures for this intermediary which is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the terms of Article 3-2(3) of the Law, Article 3(3) of the Grand-ducal regulation and Article 28 of this regulation in order to ensure that all the obligations under the Law, the Grand-ducal regulation and this regulation or at least equivalent obligations are complied with
.”
Chapter 2 Scope,
Article
3Slide11