PPT-Traditional Peer Review ULS Scholarly Communications

Lunch and Learn 14 Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing University Library System University of Pittsburgh August 21 2014 Traditional Peer Review What is p eer review Why should librarians care about peer review. Surveys in Libraries. ULS Facilitators:. Julie Watson. Research Librarian. Marywood University. Emily Daly. Head, User Experience Department. Duke University. Rebecca . Blakiston. Instructional Services Librarian. Kristen Schuster. Doctoral Student. University of Missouri Columbia. School of Information Science & Learning Technologies . Vetusta. . Monumenta. : . print and digital edition. s. Collaboration & Interdisciplinary Innovation . Dr. Alan Barnard & Prof. Robyn Nash (QUT) . Dr. Susan Shannon & Assoc. Prof. Kathleen McEvoy (University of Adelaide) . Ms. Suzanne Rochester & . Dr.. Cheryl Waters (University of Technology Sydney). Host Institution. Date. ACRL Scholarly Communications Roadshow: . From Understanding to Engagement. Economics:. The Not-So-Hidden Costs. Learning Objectives. Understand . some of the basic economic principles that characterize the traditional scholarly publishing system. TITIA VAN DER WERF. Senior Program Officer. OCLC Research, Leiden. What is . scholarly. ?. “Avoid activities that will distract you from research. Whatever you do, do not start a blog. That will only establish your lack of seriousness as a scholar.”. What’s what?. What’s the Difference?. Scholarly . Popular. Authors are authorities in their fields, specialists, experts, scholars, and researchers. Includes author’s credentials . Authors are magazine staff members or free lance writers and/or generalists. FY13 Planning Task Force. User Services Task Force. Open Meeting of the ULS Administrative Council. December 14, 2011. Agenda. What the task forces were asked to do. Introduction to the Strategic Options Analyses. University Library System, University of Pittsburgh. October – November 2011. Future Search Conference Objectives. Highly interactive, collaborative approach. Gather information from all in short period of time. Law, Regulation and Practice. Ian Freckelton QC. Crockett . Chambers, Melbourne. ;. . Professorial . Fellow in . Law . and . Psychiatry, . University of . Melbourne. I.Freckelton. @vicbar.com.au. Scholarship in the Contemporary Environment. Undergraduate Studies Writing Office . Instructor Workshop. September 30, 2009. Goals for Today. Review the research on peer review as an instructional method.. Describe different methods of peer review.. Dong Joon (DJ) Lee, PhD. Office of Scholarly Communications. Texas A&M University Libraries. January 13, 2017 . Overview. Identity and Impact. Make . your online identity . visible. Make . your scholarly work . Office of Scholarly Communication & Publishing. University Library System. University of Pittsburgh. What’s new?. New journals. New . repository. Author . fee fund. OASPA . COPE. Altmetrics. (Plum Analytics). might include editorials or book reviewsNote some publications such as some trade journals can be peer reviewed but not scholarly This is not commonCredibleA source that can be trusted to contain acc Scholarly Journals Popular MagazinesProfessional or Trade Magazines Audienc Scholars and students General public People working in a particular profession eg journalists Scholars in the field often