PPT-Traditional Peer Review ULS Scholarly Communications

Lunch and Learn 14 Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing University Library System University of Pittsburgh August 21 2014 Traditional Peer Review What is p eer review Why should librarians care about peer review. Host Institution. Date. ACRL Scholarly Communications Roadshow: . From Understanding to Engagement. Economics:. The Not-So-Hidden Costs. Learning Objectives. Understand . some of the basic economic principles that characterize the traditional scholarly publishing system. scholarship. http://. dx.doi.org. /10.7554/eLife.00452. Amy Brand, Harvard University. PLoS. Article Level Metrics Workshop. San Francisco, October 10-11, 2013. Outline. Overview of Harvard’s tenure review process. What’s what?. What’s the Difference?. Scholarly . Popular. Authors are authorities in their fields, specialists, experts, scholars, and researchers. Includes author’s credentials . Authors are magazine staff members or free lance writers and/or generalists. Why We Do It. Lunchtime Talk #1. Office of Scholarly Communication & Publishing. OSCP Lunchtime Talk Series. Origins & objectives. Toolbox Tips. Future programs. Training site. What else?. Now or later?. What’s what?. What’s the Difference?. Scholarly . Popular. Authors are authorities in their fields, specialists, experts, scholars, and researchers. Includes author’s credentials . Authors are magazine staff members or free lance writers and/or generalists. Law, Regulation and Practice. Ian Freckelton QC. Crockett . Chambers, Melbourne. ;. . Professorial . Fellow in . Law . and . Psychiatry, . University of . Melbourne. I.Freckelton. @vicbar.com.au. Scholarship in the Contemporary Environment. Dr Karim Murji. Aims of this session. To provide an overview of reviewing process for academic journals in the social sciences. To look at editorial role and processes . To identify good peer reviewing practice. might include editorials or book reviewsNote some publications such as some trade journals can be peer reviewed but not scholarly This is not commonCredibleA source that can be trusted to contain acc criteria for determining article you have Keep in mind that some articles do not meet all the criteria When in Limit your database search to academic scholarly or peer reviewed journals Many database 2. Definition of Peer Review. The dictionary meaning of the term “peer” is, a person of the same legal status or a person who is equal to another in abilities, qualifications, age, background, etc. . CAUL Communications Inventory: Some Findings Presenting on behalf of the CAUL Scholarly Communications Committee: Lise Brin, St. Francis Xavier University Geoff Brown , Dalhousie University Lis 1. NIH Virtual Seminar. October 28, 2020. Sally Amero, Ph.D.. NIH Review Policy Officer. NIH Extramural Research Integrity Liaison Officer. NIH Office of Extramural Research. ameros@od.nih.gov. ReviewPolicyOfficer@mail.nih.gov. Presentation by . Daniel Tibor. 10 November 2021. Our lessons learned. A peer review is not an audit!. Have. a . clear. . idea. . about. . your. . motivation. !. Define. . well. : . the. . subject. 2019. Presented by Dr. Bahar Mehmani. Dr.. Bahar Mehmani. Reviewer Experience Lead, Elsevier. @. mehmanib. About the speaker.  . Section 1.2: Models of peer review. Different peer review models: definitions and attitudes.