Fiscal Affairs Accounting and Reporting Update
Description: Fiscal Affairs Accounting and Reporting Update September 16, 2015 Claire Arnold, CPA Creating A More Educated Georgia 1 FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Where are we now? Budgetary Basis Compliance Reports (BCRs) submitted and reviewed
Related Topics
Download Presentation
"Fiscal Affairs Accounting and Reporting Update" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Presentation Transcript
slide1. Fiscal Affairs Accounting and Reporting Update September 16, 2015
Claire Arnold, CPA Creating A More Educated Georgia 1<br>
slide2. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Where are we now?
Budgetary Basis Compliance Reports (BCRs) submitted and reviewed
Annual Financial Reports (AFRs) submitted and reviewed
DOAA currently is working on completing your fiscal year 2015 engagements Creating A More Educated Georgia 2<br>
slide3. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle BCRs
Please provide auditor adjustments to USO (Email Claire.Arnold@usg.edu and Bruce.Jackson@usg.edu)
Consolidation Process
Institution confirmation of Surplus and BCR information
Email to be sent September 25:
Surplus by Institution (Excel File)
BCR Reports (Excel Files)
Balance Sheet by Institution
Teaching State Approp by Institution – Parts 1 & 2
Teaching Other by Institution – Parts 1 & 2
SFI by Institution – Parts 1 & 2
Research Consortium – Parts 1 & 2 Creating A More Educated Georgia 3<br>
slide4. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle BCRs
Submission to State Accounting Office on October 8, 2015
AFRs
Please provide auditor adjustments to USO (Email Claire.Arnold@usg.edu, Ben.riden@usg.edu, Theresa.Jackson@usg.edu and Brad Freeman@usg.edu)
Submit updated AFRs to MoveIT application Creating A More Educated Georgia 4<br>
slide5. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle AFRs
Example of AFR changes submission: Creating A More Educated Georgia 5<br>
slide6. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle AFRs
Example of AFR changes submission: Creating A More Educated Georgia 6<br>
slide7. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle AFRs
Consolidation Process
Institution confirmation:
Email to be sent October 5:
Statement of Net Position (SNP)
Statement of Rev, Exp & Changes in Net Position (SRECNP)
Cash Flow Statement
Confirmation of Information or changes must be emailed to Theresa.Jackson@usg.edu and ben.riden@usg.edu by October 12 Creating A More Educated Georgia 7<br>
slide8. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle DOAA is currently conducting fieldwork on the audits and FDMR engagements
Exit Conference – Include USO Accounting and Reporting
Agreed Upon Procedures (AUP) engagements postponed until January 2016
Modifications to the AUP engagements
Reduce testing to areas of importance – Balance Sheet Support; Bank Reconciliations, Subsidiary Module reconciliations, SEFA, AFR reflects accounting records activity, etc. Creating A More Educated Georgia 8<br>
slide9. FY 2015 Financial Reporting Changes DOAA and USO have identified a few items that need to be adjusted in the AFR. DOAA has agreed to make the following changes:
Note 1: Net Position – Unrestricted:
Add final sentence:
Included in the net deficit reported is the College/University’s Net Pension liability of $__________ which will be funded by appropriating resources each year as payments come due, rather than accumulating resources in advance. Creating A More Educated Georgia 9<br>
slide10. FY 2015 Financial Reporting Changes Retirement Plan Note Disclosure Change
(Per AFR email 9/1/2015)
Contributions: Per Title 47 of the O.C.G.A., contribution requirements of active employees and participating employers, as actuarially determined, are established and may be amended by the TRS Board. Contributions are expected to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. Employees were required to contribute 6.00 % of their annual pay during fiscal year 2015. The College/University’s contractually required contribution rate for the year ended June 30, 2015 was 13.15 % of annual College/University payroll. College/University contributions to TRS were $XX,XXX for the reporting period (fiscal year ended June 30, 2015) and $xx,xxx for the measurement period (fiscal year ended June 30, 2014). Creating A More Educated Georgia 10<br>
slide11. FY 2015 Financial Reporting Changes Retirement Plan Required Supplementary Information
Schedule of Contributions will include data for FY 2015, 2014 and 2013. Creating A More Educated Georgia 11<br>
slide12. FY 2015 Financial Reporting Changes Additional Items Identified that were communicated during the USO Review process:
Related party footnote to Capital Lease Liability Table in Capital Lease note disclosure
Gain/Loss on Debt Refunding footnote to the Capital Lease Liability Table in the Capital Lease note disclosure
MD&A additional verbiage related to Net Pension Restatement of Net Position
Special Item Transfer note disclosure additional verbiage for P3 assets and capital lease liability transferred to USO Creating A More Educated Georgia 12<br>
slide13. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Reporting to DOAA
TIGA
Payments and Obligations due October 15
Immigration Reform Act due December 31
SEFA – Changes Confirmation
Response to Current Year Findings
Submit Response with Closure Letter documents
Submit to Findings Management System Creating A More Educated Georgia 13<br>
slide14. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Response to Current Year Findings Creating A More Educated Georgia 14<br>
slide15. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Creating A More Educated Georgia 15<br>
slide16. Financial Reporting For FY 2016 What worked?
What didn’t work?
How can we improve? Creating A More Educated Georgia 16<br>
slide17. Standardized Chart of Accounts Standardized Chart of Accounts verses SHARE Accounts
Revisions to Chart of Accounts:
Goals:
Consistency
Information
Institutional Functionality
Chart of Accounts Committee
Committee Members: Bruce Spratt, Nick Henry, Julie Peterson, Ruth Berger, Kim Brown, Jeff Hall, Michelle Hamm, budget representatives, and ITS representatives
Submit Suggestions to Claire.Arnold@usg.edu by October 16
Timeframe – December 2 and 3 Creating A More Educated Georgia 17<br>
slide18. December Workshop Dates: December 1 and 2
Location: Middle Georgia Math Auditorium
Time: Day 1 - 9:30 am to 5:00 pm
Day 2 - 8:30 am to 4:00 pm
Preliminary Topics:
New Federal Expenditure Requirements/State Purchasing
New Retiree Health Insurance Accounting Process
Standardized Chart of Accounts
Reviewing Audit Results
oneUSG Update
Joint Staffing/TRS Eligible Salaries
GSFIC/MRR/PPV/Capital Improvements – Allowable/Unallowable and Accounting
AFR/BCR Improvement Discussion Creating A More Educated Georgia 18<br>
slide19. Uniform Federal Grant Guidance Eight different OMB guidance streamlined into one. Eliminates overlapping duplicative and conflicting guidance.
A-21
A-50
A-87 Title 2 of CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200
A-89 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES,
A-102 AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
A-110 “SUPER CIRCULAR”
A-122
A-133 Creating A More Educated Georgia 19<br>
slide20. Uniform Federal Grant Guidance Intended Outcomes
Stronger Oversight
Improved Business Processes
Well Trained Workforce
Targets Risk and Minimize Burden Creating A More Educated Georgia 20<br>
slide21. Uniform Federal Grant Guidance Effective Dates section 200.110
All awards or funding increments made on or after December 26, 2014 must adhere to the Uniform Guidance.
Audit requirements are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 26, 2014. Creating A More Educated Georgia 21<br>
slide22. Procurement Claw Creating A More Educated Georgia 22<br>
slide23. Procurement Claw Creating A More Educated Georgia 23<br>
slide24. Methods of Procurement Micro Purchases:
New term for supplies and services purchased, where the aggregate dollar amount is under $3,000.
To the extent practical, must be distributed equitably among qualified suppliers.
If your college/university considers the price reasonable after price analysis, the micro-purchase may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotes.
Many college/university have procurement policies with a minimum of $5,000 and will need to lower this minimum to $3,000 to ensure they meet the requirement. Creating A More Educated Georgia 24<br>
slide25. Methods of Procurement Small Purchases:
Existing term for supplies and services purchases, where the aggregate dollar amount is under $150,000.
The amount will be adjusted for inflation using the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.
Price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.
Must obtain quotes from more than one vendor.
Quotes can be written, verbal, or internet searches but must be documented. Creating A More Educated Georgia 25<br>
slide26. Methods of Procurement Sealed Bids: (Formal Advertising)Existing term for supplies and services purchases, where the aggregate dollar amount is over $150,000.
Bids are publicly solicited and a firm-fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price.
Preferred method for construction projects funded with federal grant funds. Creating A More Educated Georgia 26<br>
slide27. Methods of Procurement Competitive Proposals:
Existing term for supplies and services purchases, where the aggregate dollar amount is over $150,000.
Used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids.
Conducted when there is more than one source submitting an offer and either a fixed-price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded.
New requirement: Non-Federal entities must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and for selecting recipients. Creating A More Educated Georgia 27<br>
slide28. Methods of Procurement Non-Competitive Bids: (Sole Source)
Existing term for supplies and services purchased, of any dollar amount
Can only be used if (one or more, are applicable):
The item is only available from a single source.
The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation.
The federal awarding agency expressly authorizes non-competitive proposals in response to a written request.
Competition is deemed inadequate after solicitation from multiple sources. Creating A More Educated Georgia 28<br>
slide29. Other Procurement Items to Note 200.319: Contains language that prevents contractors who develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, and invitations for bids or requests for proposals from competing for such procurements.
200.319c: Written procedures for procurement transactions are still required.
August 2014 FAQ 200.320-6 –Clarifies that the Federal procurement standards are not required to apply to procurements made (charges to) the indirect cost pool and apply only to goods or services that are directly charged to a Federal award
The non-Federal entity must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the contract or purchase order. Creating A More Educated Georgia 29<br>
slide30. Other Procurement Items to Note All non-Federal entities will need to update their internal procurement policies to reflect the changes described in the Uniform Guidance.
Important that a recipient’s procurement policies identify the five allowable methods outlined in Section 200.320 (“the claw”).
Ensure your institution’s current employee conflict of interest policies include the required language.
Ensure the mandatory organizational conflict of interest policy is written, if applicable.
Review Appendix II to ensure your institution’s contracts include the required specifications. Creating A More Educated Georgia 30<br>
Claire Arnold, CPA Creating A More Educated Georgia 1<br>
slide2. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Where are we now?
Budgetary Basis Compliance Reports (BCRs) submitted and reviewed
Annual Financial Reports (AFRs) submitted and reviewed
DOAA currently is working on completing your fiscal year 2015 engagements Creating A More Educated Georgia 2<br>
slide3. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle BCRs
Please provide auditor adjustments to USO (Email Claire.Arnold@usg.edu and Bruce.Jackson@usg.edu)
Consolidation Process
Institution confirmation of Surplus and BCR information
Email to be sent September 25:
Surplus by Institution (Excel File)
BCR Reports (Excel Files)
Balance Sheet by Institution
Teaching State Approp by Institution – Parts 1 & 2
Teaching Other by Institution – Parts 1 & 2
SFI by Institution – Parts 1 & 2
Research Consortium – Parts 1 & 2 Creating A More Educated Georgia 3<br>
slide4. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle BCRs
Submission to State Accounting Office on October 8, 2015
AFRs
Please provide auditor adjustments to USO (Email Claire.Arnold@usg.edu, Ben.riden@usg.edu, Theresa.Jackson@usg.edu and Brad Freeman@usg.edu)
Submit updated AFRs to MoveIT application Creating A More Educated Georgia 4<br>
slide5. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle AFRs
Example of AFR changes submission: Creating A More Educated Georgia 5<br>
slide6. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle AFRs
Example of AFR changes submission: Creating A More Educated Georgia 6<br>
slide7. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle AFRs
Consolidation Process
Institution confirmation:
Email to be sent October 5:
Statement of Net Position (SNP)
Statement of Rev, Exp & Changes in Net Position (SRECNP)
Cash Flow Statement
Confirmation of Information or changes must be emailed to Theresa.Jackson@usg.edu and ben.riden@usg.edu by October 12 Creating A More Educated Georgia 7<br>
slide8. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle DOAA is currently conducting fieldwork on the audits and FDMR engagements
Exit Conference – Include USO Accounting and Reporting
Agreed Upon Procedures (AUP) engagements postponed until January 2016
Modifications to the AUP engagements
Reduce testing to areas of importance – Balance Sheet Support; Bank Reconciliations, Subsidiary Module reconciliations, SEFA, AFR reflects accounting records activity, etc. Creating A More Educated Georgia 8<br>
slide9. FY 2015 Financial Reporting Changes DOAA and USO have identified a few items that need to be adjusted in the AFR. DOAA has agreed to make the following changes:
Note 1: Net Position – Unrestricted:
Add final sentence:
Included in the net deficit reported is the College/University’s Net Pension liability of $__________ which will be funded by appropriating resources each year as payments come due, rather than accumulating resources in advance. Creating A More Educated Georgia 9<br>
slide10. FY 2015 Financial Reporting Changes Retirement Plan Note Disclosure Change
(Per AFR email 9/1/2015)
Contributions: Per Title 47 of the O.C.G.A., contribution requirements of active employees and participating employers, as actuarially determined, are established and may be amended by the TRS Board. Contributions are expected to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. Employees were required to contribute 6.00 % of their annual pay during fiscal year 2015. The College/University’s contractually required contribution rate for the year ended June 30, 2015 was 13.15 % of annual College/University payroll. College/University contributions to TRS were $XX,XXX for the reporting period (fiscal year ended June 30, 2015) and $xx,xxx for the measurement period (fiscal year ended June 30, 2014). Creating A More Educated Georgia 10<br>
slide11. FY 2015 Financial Reporting Changes Retirement Plan Required Supplementary Information
Schedule of Contributions will include data for FY 2015, 2014 and 2013. Creating A More Educated Georgia 11<br>
slide12. FY 2015 Financial Reporting Changes Additional Items Identified that were communicated during the USO Review process:
Related party footnote to Capital Lease Liability Table in Capital Lease note disclosure
Gain/Loss on Debt Refunding footnote to the Capital Lease Liability Table in the Capital Lease note disclosure
MD&A additional verbiage related to Net Pension Restatement of Net Position
Special Item Transfer note disclosure additional verbiage for P3 assets and capital lease liability transferred to USO Creating A More Educated Georgia 12<br>
slide13. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Reporting to DOAA
TIGA
Payments and Obligations due October 15
Immigration Reform Act due December 31
SEFA – Changes Confirmation
Response to Current Year Findings
Submit Response with Closure Letter documents
Submit to Findings Management System Creating A More Educated Georgia 13<br>
slide14. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Response to Current Year Findings Creating A More Educated Georgia 14<br>
slide15. FY 2015 Financial Engagement Cycle Creating A More Educated Georgia 15<br>
slide16. Financial Reporting For FY 2016 What worked?
What didn’t work?
How can we improve? Creating A More Educated Georgia 16<br>
slide17. Standardized Chart of Accounts Standardized Chart of Accounts verses SHARE Accounts
Revisions to Chart of Accounts:
Goals:
Consistency
Information
Institutional Functionality
Chart of Accounts Committee
Committee Members: Bruce Spratt, Nick Henry, Julie Peterson, Ruth Berger, Kim Brown, Jeff Hall, Michelle Hamm, budget representatives, and ITS representatives
Submit Suggestions to Claire.Arnold@usg.edu by October 16
Timeframe – December 2 and 3 Creating A More Educated Georgia 17<br>
slide18. December Workshop Dates: December 1 and 2
Location: Middle Georgia Math Auditorium
Time: Day 1 - 9:30 am to 5:00 pm
Day 2 - 8:30 am to 4:00 pm
Preliminary Topics:
New Federal Expenditure Requirements/State Purchasing
New Retiree Health Insurance Accounting Process
Standardized Chart of Accounts
Reviewing Audit Results
oneUSG Update
Joint Staffing/TRS Eligible Salaries
GSFIC/MRR/PPV/Capital Improvements – Allowable/Unallowable and Accounting
AFR/BCR Improvement Discussion Creating A More Educated Georgia 18<br>
slide19. Uniform Federal Grant Guidance Eight different OMB guidance streamlined into one. Eliminates overlapping duplicative and conflicting guidance.
A-21
A-50
A-87 Title 2 of CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200
A-89 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES,
A-102 AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
A-110 “SUPER CIRCULAR”
A-122
A-133 Creating A More Educated Georgia 19<br>
slide20. Uniform Federal Grant Guidance Intended Outcomes
Stronger Oversight
Improved Business Processes
Well Trained Workforce
Targets Risk and Minimize Burden Creating A More Educated Georgia 20<br>
slide21. Uniform Federal Grant Guidance Effective Dates section 200.110
All awards or funding increments made on or after December 26, 2014 must adhere to the Uniform Guidance.
Audit requirements are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 26, 2014. Creating A More Educated Georgia 21<br>
slide22. Procurement Claw Creating A More Educated Georgia 22<br>
slide23. Procurement Claw Creating A More Educated Georgia 23<br>
slide24. Methods of Procurement Micro Purchases:
New term for supplies and services purchased, where the aggregate dollar amount is under $3,000.
To the extent practical, must be distributed equitably among qualified suppliers.
If your college/university considers the price reasonable after price analysis, the micro-purchase may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotes.
Many college/university have procurement policies with a minimum of $5,000 and will need to lower this minimum to $3,000 to ensure they meet the requirement. Creating A More Educated Georgia 24<br>
slide25. Methods of Procurement Small Purchases:
Existing term for supplies and services purchases, where the aggregate dollar amount is under $150,000.
The amount will be adjusted for inflation using the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.
Price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.
Must obtain quotes from more than one vendor.
Quotes can be written, verbal, or internet searches but must be documented. Creating A More Educated Georgia 25<br>
slide26. Methods of Procurement Sealed Bids: (Formal Advertising)Existing term for supplies and services purchases, where the aggregate dollar amount is over $150,000.
Bids are publicly solicited and a firm-fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price.
Preferred method for construction projects funded with federal grant funds. Creating A More Educated Georgia 26<br>
slide27. Methods of Procurement Competitive Proposals:
Existing term for supplies and services purchases, where the aggregate dollar amount is over $150,000.
Used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids.
Conducted when there is more than one source submitting an offer and either a fixed-price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded.
New requirement: Non-Federal entities must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and for selecting recipients. Creating A More Educated Georgia 27<br>
slide28. Methods of Procurement Non-Competitive Bids: (Sole Source)
Existing term for supplies and services purchased, of any dollar amount
Can only be used if (one or more, are applicable):
The item is only available from a single source.
The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation.
The federal awarding agency expressly authorizes non-competitive proposals in response to a written request.
Competition is deemed inadequate after solicitation from multiple sources. Creating A More Educated Georgia 28<br>
slide29. Other Procurement Items to Note 200.319: Contains language that prevents contractors who develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, and invitations for bids or requests for proposals from competing for such procurements.
200.319c: Written procedures for procurement transactions are still required.
August 2014 FAQ 200.320-6 –Clarifies that the Federal procurement standards are not required to apply to procurements made (charges to) the indirect cost pool and apply only to goods or services that are directly charged to a Federal award
The non-Federal entity must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of the contract or purchase order. Creating A More Educated Georgia 29<br>
slide30. Other Procurement Items to Note All non-Federal entities will need to update their internal procurement policies to reflect the changes described in the Uniform Guidance.
Important that a recipient’s procurement policies identify the five allowable methods outlined in Section 200.320 (“the claw”).
Ensure your institution’s current employee conflict of interest policies include the required language.
Ensure the mandatory organizational conflict of interest policy is written, if applicable.
Review Appendix II to ensure your institution’s contracts include the required specifications. Creating A More Educated Georgia 30<br>