Mongolia Extractive Industries Transparency
Author : olivia-moreira | Published Date : 2025-07-16
Description: Mongolia Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative Reconciliation Reports 20062008 Short version Mongolia EITI MultiStakeholders Working Group and Secretariat Ulaanbaatar 2011 1 Since its first Mongolias EITI reconciliation
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download
Presentation The PPT/PDF document
"Mongolia Extractive Industries Transparency" is the property of its rightful owner.
Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only,
and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all
copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of
this agreement.
Transcript:Mongolia Extractive Industries Transparency:
Mongolia Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative Reconciliation Reports 2006-2008 (Short version) Mongolia EITI Multi-Stakeholder’s Working Group and Secretariat Ulaanbaatar, 2011 1 Since it’s first Mongolia’s EITI reconciliation report in 2006, Mongolia had three reports for the year of 2006, 2007 and 2008. It is valuable result that every year number of companies has been increasing and amount of discrepancies has been reducing. (See table 1) 2 Overview of Mongolia EITI Reconciliation Reports 2006-2008 Table 1. Comparison Table 2. Financial Flow As seeing table above, 36-46 percent of state budget are transparent as a result of EITI report. As seeing table above, 36-46 percent of state budget are transparent as a result of EITI report. Since it’s first Mongolia’s EITI reconciliation report in 2006, Mongolia had three reports for the year of 2006, 2007 and 2008. It is valuable result that every year number of companies has been increasing and amount of discrepancies has been reducing. (See table 1) 3 Overview of Mongolia EITI Reconciliation Reports 2006-2008 The first reconciliation covers 25 companies reports above 200,0 million MNT materiality payments and Government receipts. In this report, the Government has declared receipts with the amount of 467,1 billion MNT, companies has proved payments with the amount of 492,2 billion MNT (See table 3). Major Findings: The major discrepancies were from taxes (appx. MNT 552,1 million), fees (appx. MNT 20,0 billion) and donations (appx. MNT 3,7 billion). From the Taxes section the main discrepancies were mainly from items reported such as Value added tax deducted from paid back, Corporate income tax, and tax on petrol and diesel fuel amounting to MNT 1,4 billion, MNT 2,0 billion, and MNT 1,0 billion respectively. Main reasons: VAT is paid by mining companies on the procurement of goods and services from the local market. Export of minerals however attracts a VAT rebate and as a result mining companies accumulate large net VAT credit balances (balances due to them). Amounts levied for other taxes (e.g. income tax, Windfall tax) can be offset against such accumulated credit balances. EITIM instructions do not provide clear guidelines as to how the various VAT items are to be dealt with in the templates. As a result there was no consistency between companies, and between companies and the tax office in respect of what was included in templates. In Corporate income tax, the major unresolved issue relates to the offsetting by the tax office