Sensory Evaluation Food & Nutritional Sciences
Description: Sensory Evaluation Food Nutritional Sciences Course 1 How the Cookie Crumbles Developing a Sensory Evaluation Instrument List all important characteristics Narrow list to 5 items Develop a scale for each characteristic from one extreme to
Related Topics
Download Presentation
"Sensory Evaluation Food & Nutritional Sciences" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Presentation Transcript
slide1. Sensory Evaluation Food & Nutritional Sciences Course 1
How the Cookie Crumbles<br>
slide2. Developing a Sensory Evaluation Instrument List all important characteristics
Narrow list to 5 items
Develop a scale for each characteristic from one extreme to another
Example: Chewiness goes from too chewy to too crunchy
Draw a 10cm line and place the extremes at either end of the line.
Repeat for all characteristics<br>
slide3. Hypothesis Before we can collect any data, we have to have a hypothesis to test for each item.
Null hypothesis always states “no difference”
Alternate hypothesis states “difference”
Example for chewiness:
Null: There is no difference in chewiness between the original recipe and the healthy recipe.
Alternate: There is a difference in chewiness between the original recipe and the healthy recipe.<br>
slide4. Hypothesis Note: we didn’t state a direction of difference (chewier or crunchier)
Write a hypothesis for each item.
We’ll explain testing after we have data.<br>
slide5. Data Entry Measure the distance from the left side of the line to the participant’s mark on each item and write in the margin (in centimeters).
The number of centimeters – with decimal values – is the data.
Enter into the cell for the participant and item #.
Automatically calculates significance for you.
If p < 0.05, there is a difference between the cookies.<br>
slide6. Data Entry Enter all data in the spreadsheet:<br>
slide7. Data Collection Decide on a labeling plan (and stick to it!)
participant number
Something to indicate healthy or original WITHOUT revealing to participant
Present participant with on cookie on a plate & have taste
Provide form & allow them to continue tasting while completing form<br>
slide8. Data Collection Repeat with the other cookie
You need 40 participants!<br>
slide9. Data Analysis The spreadsheet has formulas ready to go
You can type in the blue cells only.<br>
slide10. Data Analysis If the p-value is less than 0.05, reject the null hypothesis
There is a significant difference between the cookies
If two-tailed t-score is greater than 0.05, keep the null hypothesis.
There is not a significant difference between the cookies
Repeat for all items and record your findings.<br>
slide11. Drawing Conclusions Conclusions are the decisions you make based on your results.
On which items did you have a significant difference between cookies?
What do you think that means about people’s cookie choices?
Do you think your healthy option cookies will sell?<br>
How the Cookie Crumbles<br>
slide2. Developing a Sensory Evaluation Instrument List all important characteristics
Narrow list to 5 items
Develop a scale for each characteristic from one extreme to another
Example: Chewiness goes from too chewy to too crunchy
Draw a 10cm line and place the extremes at either end of the line.
Repeat for all characteristics<br>
slide3. Hypothesis Before we can collect any data, we have to have a hypothesis to test for each item.
Null hypothesis always states “no difference”
Alternate hypothesis states “difference”
Example for chewiness:
Null: There is no difference in chewiness between the original recipe and the healthy recipe.
Alternate: There is a difference in chewiness between the original recipe and the healthy recipe.<br>
slide4. Hypothesis Note: we didn’t state a direction of difference (chewier or crunchier)
Write a hypothesis for each item.
We’ll explain testing after we have data.<br>
slide5. Data Entry Measure the distance from the left side of the line to the participant’s mark on each item and write in the margin (in centimeters).
The number of centimeters – with decimal values – is the data.
Enter into the cell for the participant and item #.
Automatically calculates significance for you.
If p < 0.05, there is a difference between the cookies.<br>
slide6. Data Entry Enter all data in the spreadsheet:<br>
slide7. Data Collection Decide on a labeling plan (and stick to it!)
participant number
Something to indicate healthy or original WITHOUT revealing to participant
Present participant with on cookie on a plate & have taste
Provide form & allow them to continue tasting while completing form<br>
slide8. Data Collection Repeat with the other cookie
You need 40 participants!<br>
slide9. Data Analysis The spreadsheet has formulas ready to go
You can type in the blue cells only.<br>
slide10. Data Analysis If the p-value is less than 0.05, reject the null hypothesis
There is a significant difference between the cookies
If two-tailed t-score is greater than 0.05, keep the null hypothesis.
There is not a significant difference between the cookies
Repeat for all items and record your findings.<br>
slide11. Drawing Conclusions Conclusions are the decisions you make based on your results.
On which items did you have a significant difference between cookies?
What do you think that means about people’s cookie choices?
Do you think your healthy option cookies will sell?<br>