/
A Greek Tragedy Antigone A Greek Tragedy Antigone

A Greek Tragedy Antigone - PowerPoint Presentation

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
358 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-06

A Greek Tragedy Antigone - PPT Presentation

Characteristics of a tragic hero Undergoes a morally significant struggle that ends disastrously Essentially a superior person who is treated sympathetically we like them in spite of what the hero might do ID: 718557

action stage good people stage action people good morality society level chorus laws tragic tragedy hero flaw character social

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A Greek Tragedy Antigone" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

A Greek Tragedy

AntigoneSlide2

Characteristics of a tragic hero:

Undergoes a morally significant struggle that ends disastrously.

Essentially a superior person who is treated sympathetically (we like them in spite of what the hero might do)Not all good or all bad (very human)Has a high, respected position to disgrace or unhappiness or death.

Tragic HeroSlide3

Hamartia – some defect in the tragic character that helps cause his own ruin. For the Greeks this flaw is hubris (excessive pride). The flaw may seem to be jealousy, anger, ambition, etc., but it will always be because the character thinks himself too superior in some way. Because of this hubris, whatever happens to the tragic hero is not all undeserved.

Tragic flaw (Hamartia)Slide4

Reversal of situation (

peripety

) – good begins to slide or go badRecognition (a.k.a. epiphany) – discovery of the critical fact – the hero realizes his own flaw has brought him to this low point.Scene of suffering – destructive or painful action such as a death on the stage, bodily agony, wounds, etc. (the suffering and final submission of the hero)

Classic Moments in the tragic plot:Slide5

Aristotle defines tragedy as “the imitation of an action which is serious, complete, of a certain magnitude, couched in poetic language. It should be dramatic, with incidents arousing pity and fear, which bring about a purgation of these emotions.”

Pity is aroused in the audience for the character(s), and we fear lest the same misfortune happen to us. Purgation/

catharsis is a cleansing; a release of emotions.According to Aristotle, “comedy portrays men as worse than they are and tragedy as better than in actual life.”

He also notes that Sophocles “drew men as they ought to be.”

Aristotle’s definition of TragedySlide6

Time – 24 hours for the action of the play.

Place – no change of scenery

Action – no subplot (an action which happens elsewhere is told by another character)Dramatic UnitiesSlide7

Prologue

– introductory section that gives the background (usually expository rather than dramatic)

Parados – entrance of chorus; chorus chants more background to the story.

Episodes and

Stasimon

– Action begins with the first episode (usually 5 episodes) followed by a

parados

(chorus). The choral odes are called

stasima

.

Exodus

– the final action of the play. 2 features: messenger speech and the

deus ex machina, in which the deity is brought in to intervene in the action.Chorus – there is always a chorus in Greek tragedy. Chorus fulfills several functions:Members sang, danced and played instrumentsIdeal audience – responding to the action as the poet intended.Modulated the atmosphere and tone (representative of typical Athenian citizens – conservative but not submissive)Questions new characters as to origin or purposeChoral odes showed the passage of time.

Structure of TragedySlide8

Greek TheaterSlide9

Major conflict: Individual conscience at odds with established authority.

Questions for discussion:

When we know that those in power are morally wrong, do we break their laws, or do we collaborate with them by obeying?How important is doing the right thing? [What is “right” and what is “wrong”?]

Antigone

by SophoclesSlide10

Who is this Woman?Slide11

Did Kendrick Lamar find Lady Justice?Slide12

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral DevelopmentSlide13

Level

I.

Preconventional

Morality

Stage 1. Obedience and Punishment

People at this stage:

Do

not yet speak as members of society; they see morality as something external to themselves, as that which the “big people” say they must do

See

morality as a fixed set of rules

F

ear

punishment from authority figuresSlide14

Level

I.

Preconventional

Morality

Stage 2

Individualism and Exchange

People at this stage:

believe

in more than one right view handed

down

by authorities

understand

that different people

have different

viewpoints

view

punishment as a risk that one wants to

avoid

Sees and values personal rewards for good behavior

and this causes one to

have

some sense of right actionSlide15

Level II. Conventional Morality

Stage 3. Good Interpersonal Relationships

People at this stage:

believe that people should live up to the expectations of the family and community and behave in a “good” manner.

think that “good behavior” = having good motives and interpersonal feelings such as love, empathy, trust and concern for others.

exhibit a shift from unquestioning obedience to a relativistic outlook and a concern for good motives. Slide16

Level II. Conventional Morality

Stage 4. Maintaining the Social Order

People at this stage:

are more broadly concerned with society as a whole (rather than simply the individual)

emphasize obeying laws, respecting authority, and performing one’s duty so that social order is maintained.

believe that following laws (no matter what) is important, as without laws there would be chaos. Slide17

Level III. Postconventional Morality

Stage 5: Social Contract and Individual Rights

People at this stage:

ask the question, “What makes for a good society?”

begin to think about society in a theoretical way, stepping back from their individual concerns and society and considering the rights and values a society ought to uphold.

believe a good society is conceived as a social contract into which people freely enter to work toward the benefit of all.

believe basic rights, such as liberty and life should be protected.

believe we should use some democratic procedures for changing unfair laws, in order to improved society. Agree to uphold laws until we can change them. Slide18

Level III. Postconventional Morality

Stage 6: Universal Principles

People at this stage:

seek to define the principles by which we achieve justice

follow the philosophies of great moral leaders such as Ghandi and Martin Luther King;

treat the claims of all parties in an impartial manner, respecting the basic dignity of all people.

look at moral dilemmas through another’s eyes

practice civil disobedience; believe that individuals have the right and responsibility to change injustice. Slide19

Heinz Dilemma

Monkey Experiment

Kohlberg Theory in Practice