/
A multi-disciplinary approach to reducing  haemodialysis ca A multi-disciplinary approach to reducing  haemodialysis ca

A multi-disciplinary approach to reducing haemodialysis ca - PowerPoint Presentation

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
387 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-29

A multi-disciplinary approach to reducing haemodialysis ca - PPT Presentation

Dr Karen Burns Consultant Clinical Microbiologist Beaumont Hospital 4 th Annual Transplant amp Nephrology Conference November 27 th 2015 Presentation Outline Introduction Why do we care about haemodialysis catheterrelated infection ID: 564373

karen 2015 november burns 2015 karen burns november aureus infection bsi patients haemodialysis catheter amp vascular mrsa site positive 2014 skin nasal

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A multi-disciplinary approach to reducin..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

A multi-disciplinary approach to reducing haemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections

Dr Karen BurnsConsultant Clinical Microbiologist, Beaumont Hospital4th Annual Transplant & Nephrology ConferenceNovember 27th 2015Slide2

Presentation Outline

IntroductionWhy do we care about haemodialysis catheter-related infection?Where we wereWhat we’ve doneConclusion

2

Karen Burns November 2015Slide3

Introduction

Data presented on behalf of our multi-disciplinary team:Maeve Crudge & Maria Greene, Renal IPCNsMairead Skally, Microbiology Surveillance ScientistHaemodialysis Nursing Team, led by Veronica FrancisNephrology Clinical & Nursing TeamClinical Microbiology TeamInfection Prevention & Control

TeamBeaumont Hospital Kidney Centre162 hospital haemodialysis patients:Haemodialysis catheter: 60%

Fistula/graft: 40%45 PD patients25 home haemodialysis patients

Nov 2015 data courtesy: C Collier & F Auguste

3

Karen Burns November 2015Slide4

http://www.hse.ie/eng/about/Who/NRO/epidemiology.pdf

4

Karen Burns November 2015Slide5

Resident Flora

10 times more bacterialive on and in a human,than the sum of that

person’s own cells

Bacteria found in and on the human body usually causing no harm – “normal flora” / “colonisers”

Important to our survival

Protect us from infection with

C.

difficile

5

Karen Burns November 2015Slide6

WHO Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Healthcare 2009

Transient Flora – Social & healthcare hand hygiene

6

Karen Burns November 2015Slide7

Skin Barrier

Healthcare increases a patient’s risk of developing infection

7

Karen Burns November 2015Slide8

Introduction

Haemodialysis:Temporary vascular accessLong-term vascular access

Intravascular catheters are a risk factor for infection:

Exit site infection

Catheter tunnel infection

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI)/bacteraemia

8

Karen Burns November 2015Slide9

9

Karen Burns November 2015Slide10

What bugs cause haemodialysis catheter-related infection?

Any microorganism can cause infection: bacteria, yeasts/candidaImportant factors: Bacteria: virulence, antimicrobial resistanceOpportunity/portal of entry: skin break, breach in sterile technique, biofilm, personal hygiene Host/patient’s immune response: sepsis, critical illness, immunocompromise, prior antimicrobial exposure, skin breaks

Haemodialysis status: acutely unwell vs chronic stable

Haemodialysis access: temporary non-tunnelled vs long-term tunnelled

10

Karen Burns November 2015Slide11

Biofilm

Surface

Primary Attachment

Accumulation

Microcolony Formation

Community of bacterial cells enclosed in a self-produced matrix (slime) adherent to a surface e.g; catheter tubing

60% of HCAI involve biofilms

11

Karen Burns November 2015Slide12

BSI Diagnosis

12

Karen Burns November 2015Slide13

Staphylococcus aureusSTAPHYLE = “BUNCH OF GRAPES”, KOKKOS = “GRAIN/BERRY”

Gram-positive cocci in clustersCoagulase positiveNormal flora/coloniser of nasal passages of up to 30% of general population – carriage may be intermittent or chronicSkin carriage promoted in setting of skin breaks/conditionsEstimate 53 million people colonised with S. aureus in US26% of 2,374 patients undergoing haemodialysis nasal carriers of

S. aureus

Grothe

C

et al

BMC Nephrology 2014;15:202

13

Karen Burns November 2015Slide14

On blood agar: Large beta haemolytic creamy-white colonies typical of

S.aureus

14

Karen Burns November 2015Slide15

S. aureus & infection

Skin/soft tissue – cellulitis, abscess, surgical site infections, device exit site infectionBloodstream infection (BSI)Deep-seated infection: endocarditis, discitis, osteomyelitis, epidural, psoas abscess etc. Infection caused by S. aureus can result in sepsis, septic shock, death

15

Karen Burns November 2015Slide16

T1 weighted MRI image reveals abnormal

signal at intervertebral disc level L2-3 with associated

vertebral osteomyelitis. CT-guided biopsy aspirate

grew S.aureus

Large ulcerovegetative lesion on mitral valve.

Culture grew

S.aureus

BONE INFECTION

INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS

Large buttock carbuncle which developed

over 7-10 days and required incision, drainage

and IV antibiotics. Pus grew

S.aureus

SKIN & SOFT TISSUE INFECTION

16

Karen Burns November 2015Slide17

Staphylococcus aureusS. aureus

Antimicrobial resistance is an issue for S. aureus:Meticillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)Meticillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA)

Glycopeptide intermediate S. aureus (GISA)

Glycopeptide/vancomycin resistant S. aureus

(GRSA/VRSA)

17

Karen Burns November 2015Slide18

What do we know about S. aureus infection in Ireland?

We don’t know the total burden of S. aureus infection in IrelandS. aureus bloodstream infection (SA BSI) reported by microbiology laboratories to HPSC on a quarterly basis:2015 HSE annual service plan: KPI for national rate of MRSA BSI in acute hospitals of <0.057/1000 bed days used (2014 national rate = 0.055)

SA

BSI in Ireland

2005

2014

Total

cases

1,424

1,118

Total MRSA

(%)

592 (41.6)

218 (19.5%)

18

Karen Burns November 2015Slide19

What do we know about S. aureus infection in Ireland?

21 labs provided additional information on SA BSI in 2014:Since April 2014, mandatory monthly reporting of: new hospital-acquired SA BSI, by each acute hospital to HSE for monthly performance assurance report – data remains unpublished to date –

doesn’t include burden of outpatient haemodialysis SA BSI

MSSA

BSI

MRSA BSI

Total

378

92

% Community-acquired

35%

23%

% Haemodialysis

8%

3%

http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/corporate/performancereports/aug15pr.pdf

19

Karen Burns November 2015Slide20

What do we know about S. aureus

BSI in our hospital?

106 SA BSI in 2014, 21 MRSA BSI (19.8%)

Ϯ2015 data to end Q2 only

20

Karen Burns November 2015Slide21

What do we know about S. aureus BSI

in our haemodialysis patients?All haemodialysis patients with SA BSI diagnosed in our microbiology laboratory: 1998 – 2009 304 patients with 394 episodes of SA BSI69% MSSA vs 31% MRSAMajority of episodes due to intravascular catheter (83%)11% of episodes associated with infectious complication

Fitzgerald S

et al. J Hosp Infect

2011 (79);218-221.

21

Karen Burns November 2015Slide22

What do we know about S. aureus BSI

in our haemodialysis patients?Clinical microbiology team reviews all inpatients with significant sterile site isolatesJanuary 2007 – June 2012: Renal patients accounted for 20% of all positive blood cultures processed in our laboratory:Coagulase-negative staphylococciS. aureus E. coli

Renal patients accounted for 30% of all S. aureus

BSI

22

Karen Burns November 2015Slide23

Why should we care about SA BSIin our haemodialysis patients?

Increasing prevalence of patients with ESKD in Ireland

http://www.hse.ie/eng/about/Who/NRO/epidemiology.pdf

23

Karen Burns November 2015Slide24

Why should we care about SA BSIin our haemodialysis patients?

Vascular catheter use for haemodialysis is high in Ireland2011 national survey: none of 19 Irish HD units met NKF-KDOQI targets of AVF prevalence >65% & CVC prevalence <10%

McCann M. National survey of routine practice in Irish haemodialysis units 2011; Report Jan 2013

24

Karen Burns November 2015Slide25

S. aureus BSI results in morbidity & mortality for our haemodialysis patientsS. aureus

BSI results in requirement for hospitalisation, removal of permcath, temporary catheter placement and replacement of permcath, invasive investigation for infectious complications (e.g., TOE), minimum of 14 days intravenous antimicrobial therapyReduced future vascular access site options

Why should we care about SA BSI

in our haemodialysis patients?25

Karen Burns November 2015Slide26

Critical control points for infection prevention

Device insertionDevice maintenanceDevice useSurveillance of device-related infection:

You can’t manage it if you’re not measuring it

26

Karen Burns November 2015Slide27

National guidance

2009

2

005

2005

27

Karen Burns November 2015Slide28

Do you know what’s going on inyour haemodialysis unit?

McCann M. National survey of routine practice in Irish haemodialysis units 2011; Report Jan 2013

28

Karen Burns November 2015Slide29

October 2012 – MDT convened

Screening for carriage of S. aureus:? All S. aureus (MRSA & MSSA)? Just MRSATiming, frequency, logisitics of screening, lab workloadWhat to do with the positive patient?

29

Karen Burns November 2015Slide30

October 2012 – MDT convened

Improving surveillance of S. aureus BSI:Real-time surveillanceInformation for action – feedback and review of dataTimely root cause analysis and actionCalculation of rates of infection - ? Denominator – patient months, line daysStratification of rates by BH dialysis unit

30

Karen Burns November 2015Slide31

October 2012 – MDT convened

Standardisation of vascular catheter insertion – procedure, documentation – ICU, theatre, radiology, wardStandardisation of vascular catheter maintenance – care bundles, procedures, dressingsAudit and feedback – are we doing what we’ve agreed to do?Education of staff and patientsOngoing promotion of fistula routePlan for further MDT meetings

31

Karen Burns November 2015Slide32

What did we do?

Q1 2013: Renal IPCN appointedJanuary 2013: Enhanced surveillance of renal S. aureus BSIJuly 2013: Quarterly screening of haemodialysis patients for MRSA carriage: nasal, catheter exit site, other skin breaks, device sites as indicated:Tell patients why they’re being screenedDo the screening – HD unitProcess and report specimens – clinical micro lab and teamIdentify, communicate with and manage MRSA positive patients – nose positive, exit site positive, multiple sites positive - MDT

Follow-up screening post-decolonisationManagement of chronic MRSA carriersWe found no new MRSA carriers on our first round of screening: 2/173 patients positive, both previously known

32

Karen Burns November 2015Slide33

33

Karen Burns November 2015Slide34

Our first six months

Eight S. aureus BSI (MSSA;5, MRSA;3)Seven patients had prior positive microbiology results for S. aureusTwo patients had exit site infection Six BSI secondary to infected vascular catheterTwo CRBSI arose within 48 hours of device insertionRoom to improve with regard to documentation of device insertion and device maintenanceSuboptimal personal hygiene an issue in three cases

Infection rates higher in acute HD setting

34

Karen Burns November 2015Slide35

Ongoing work - 2014

Maintain surveillance & feedbackMaintain quarterly MRSA screening – no new positive patients identifiedFeedback results at unit levelContinue MDT meetings

35

Karen Burns November 2015Slide36

New changes - 2014

Increased ANTT trainingTransition to Chlorprep applicator for exit site to facilitate ANTTUnit level run charts, with latest data displayed in staff roomQIP with additional focus at HD unit CNM meetingsPatients and staff wear surgical mask for CVC care proceduresStaff providing education to patients on importance of sterile field during HDDermatology referral for patients with skin sensitivity issuesExit site infection management protocol

Routine S. aureus decolonisation protocol pre-permcath insertion or AVG creation

36

Karen Burns November 2015Slide37

New changes - 2014

ELECTIVE Permanent CVC/ AVG formation

Regimen:

Triclosan 1 % (Skinsan) skin wash daily for 5 days (2 of the 5 days hair to be washed with this also)

Mupirocin 2% (Bactroban Nasal Ointment) intranasally, 3 times daily for 5 days

Day before procedure

Day of Procedure

1

st

Day after procedure

2

nd

day after procedure

3

rd

day after procedure

Wash hair and body with

Triclosan 1 % (Skinsan) and

nasal

Mupirocin 2%, 3 times a day

Wash hair and body with

Triclosan 1 % (Skinsan) and

nasal

Mupirocin 2%, 3 times a day

Wash only body with

Triclosan 1 % (Skinsan) and

nasal

Mupirocin 2%, 3 times a day

Wash only body with

Triclosan 1 % (Skinsan) and

nasal

Mupirocin 2%, 3 times a day

Wash only body with

Triclosan

1 % (

Skinsan

) and

nasal

Mupirocin

2%, 3 times a day

37

Karen Burns November 2015Slide38

38

Karen Burns November 2015Slide39

The first two years

12% reduction in renal S. aureus BSI due to vascular cathetersReduction in S. aureus BSI infection rate in acute haemodialysis settingMore data gathered on infection risk factors:

Risk factors

2014

2013

S.

aureus

colonisation

6

10

Exit

site/tunnel

infections

3

5*

Exit site

irritation/sensitivity

4

0

Poor

flows-

requiring additional manipulation during treatment

3

2

Dwell time of CVC: >2years

2

1

Recent

device insertion

procedure (<1 week):

0

4

Recent

holiday

haemodialysis

1

1

*3 initially had sensitivities to dressing/ cleaning agent

39

Karen Burns November 2015Slide40

The third year (to end Q3 2015)

64% reduction in vascular catheter related S. aureus BSI vs same period 201418% increase in vascular catheter line days Q1 – Q3 2015Ongoing education – standard precautions, hand hygiene, decolonisation protocolANTT intervention kitLearning points shared from RCA findingsElectronic flags to identify patients with prior S. aureus infection

40

Karen Burns November 2015Slide41

To wrap up…

HD patients are at-risk of infectionRisk escalates for HD patients with vascular cathetersWhile S. aureus is the major player in vascular catheter-related infection, other bugs can be implicated, particularly in acute HD and temporary catheter settings The vascular catheter is not the cause of every haemodialysis patient’s SA-BSI

41

Karen Burns November 2015Slide42

The key ingredients

Multi-disciplinary team work & communicationConsistent application of proven evidence-based interventionsContinuous quality improvement & keeping up-to-dateOngoing surveillance, root cause analysis, with timely feedback to those who need to knowLocal leadership, enthusiasm and commitment to patient safety and quality of care

42

Karen Burns November 2015Slide43

Updated national guidance

2013

2014

43

Karen Burns November 2015Slide44

Thanks to my colleagues &thanks to you for your attention

karenburns@beaumont.ie

44

Karen Burns November 2015