PPT-Reducing controversy by connecting opposing views

kiran garimella Gianmarco De Francisci Morales Aristides Gionis Michael Mathioudakis 1 Controversies are everywhere Twitter 3 Garimella et al WSDM 2016 Blogs 4 Instagram 5. Robertson mbryonic stem cell ESC research has been a source of ethical legal and social controversy since the 64257rst successful culturing of human ESCs in the laboratory in 1998 The controversy has slowed the pace of stem cell science and shaped m J. Faith Peppers. University of Georgia. . What is controversy?. Strongly polarized opinions.. High emotions.. Opposing sides may use loaded rhetoric to persuade.. What are your issues?. What makes them controversial?. Academic Controversy: . The . Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning. Workshop for. Universiti. . Teknologi. Malaysia. Karl A. Smith. Engineering Education – Purdue University. STEM Education Center/Civil Eng - University of Minnesota. :. Tips. , Pointers and Best . Practices. Igor Ellyn, . QC, CS, FCIArb.. Legal Counsel, Chartered Arbitrator, Mediator. Business . Litigation & Arbitration . Lawyers. Avocats en litige et arbitrage commercial . Lesson Aim. : . To be able to confidently answer a controversy question.. N.B. Source record sheets/word count. . TASK:. Re-cap: Lets make a big timeline to remind ourselves! . Timeline….. Add date and a bit of info. Ms. Lindsay . Aim: How do we write our opposing claim paragraph?. Do Now. . (IN YOUR GROUP). : . Describe your piece of media to your group, and tell them your claim. Ask them what . other claims . could be made about your piece of media. . (Depts. of Transportation). Pat Burns, CIO. Colorado State University. RMCMOA . Presentation. January . 13, . 2014. 01/12/15. Connecting the DOTS. 1. The Fiber “Value Proposition”. CSU transitioned from Qwest xx Mbps service to fiber. Sake…. Writing . Counter-arguments and Rebuttals. ENDURING UNDERSTANDING. 1. In . order to . write a convincing essay . you may need to . anticipate common opposing arguments. . that dispute your thesis. Finding the Middle Ground. Qualifying. Arguments assume differences of opinion, but an argument can find a middle ground between opposing sides. . Qualifying can add complexity and sophistication because it demonstrates a complete understanding of an issue.. UNCONNECTED. Mike Watson. Heartcentricleadership.com. A. S. A. A. E. E. E = Observations and Experiences. A. = Ideas, Concepts, Theories. S. = Propositions. Creation. Unconnected. Deduction. Connected. and Rebuttal. Purpose of an Opposing Claim. The purpose of an opposing/counter claim is to show the reader you have considered all sides of the question or issue. An opposing claim and rebuttal strengthen your essay by showing that you have looked at all sides and made an educated choice.. The Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning. Lilly Teaching Seminar. Michigan State University. April 11, . 2013. Karl A. Smith. STEM Education Center / . Technological Leadership Institute. /. . Civil . Principle #1. - Connecting increases your influence in every situation.. Successful US Presidents exhibit 5 qualities:. Vision. Pragmatism. Consensus Building. Charisma. Trustworthiness. 4 of the 5 skills to being a successful leader have to do with connecting.. DOIP. general info. The digital . repository. at . the. . MPI. . for. . Psycholinguistics. . has. . several. sub-. collections. . . One. . is. . the. well-. known. DOBES . archive. . In total .