PPT-Reducing controversy by connecting opposing views

kiran garimella Gianmarco De Francisci Morales Aristides Gionis Michael Mathioudakis 1 Controversies are everywhere Twitter 3 Garimella et al WSDM 2016 Blogs 4 Instagram 5. The competing accounts can be roughly gr ouped together in two categories 1 Reductionist accounts Psychiatric disorders should be regarded as biological kinds and thus a successful reduction of psychiatry to neurobiology is both defended and wished The controversy centres around the compatibility of the insulation with the hot bitumen that bonds the r oof membrane to it Other problems include dimensional instability cupping warping shrinking etc rigidity problems and off gassing Prior to the l (. WA Chapter. 7). CS4001 . Kristin Marsicano. Three types of arguments. This chapter categorizes arguments based on their treatment of alternative views. One-sided. Muti. -sided. Dialogic. Think-pair-share: Briefly describe each type.. Karl A. Smith. Engineering Education – Purdue University. STEM Education Center/Civil Eng – University of Minnesota. ksmith@umn.edu - http://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith/. Constructive Controversy for Innovation (CCI). J. Faith Peppers. University of Georgia. . What is controversy?. Strongly polarized opinions.. High emotions.. Opposing sides may use loaded rhetoric to persuade.. What are your issues?. What makes them controversial?. Classical, Toulmin and Rogerian. The Classical Model. Introduction. Lead-in. Overview of the situation. Background. Position statement (thesis). Appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) and evidence. Appeals: to ethics, character, authority (ethos); to emotions (pathos); to reason logos). (Depts. of Transportation). Pat Burns, CIO. Colorado State University. RMCMOA . Presentation. January . 13, . 2014. 01/12/15. Connecting the DOTS. 1. The Fiber “Value Proposition”. CSU transitioned from Qwest xx Mbps service to fiber. W O R DS. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be. FIE 2009: Special Session. Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech. Karl Smith, Purdue University/U of MN. Introduce Constructive Academic Controversy (CAC) ~ 15 min. Actively Participate in CAC ~60 min. Topic: . UNCONNECTED. Mike Watson. Heartcentricleadership.com. A. S. A. A. E. E. E = Observations and Experiences. A. = Ideas, Concepts, Theories. S. = Propositions. Creation. Unconnected. Deduction. Connected. PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS. K SIVA RAMA KRISHNA. Y LOKESWARA RAO. R MANI KANTA. S SATISH. D NETAJI. ABSTRACT. The automobile engine connecting rod is a high volume production, critical component. It connects reciprocating piston to rotating crankshaft. . and Rebuttal. Purpose of an Opposing Claim. The purpose of an opposing/counter claim is to show the reader you have considered all sides of the question or issue. An opposing claim and rebuttal strengthen your essay by showing that you have looked at all sides and made an educated choice.. The Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning. Lilly Teaching Seminar. Michigan State University. April 11, . 2013. Karl A. Smith. STEM Education Center / . Technological Leadership Institute. /. . Civil . Lab activity in preparation for practical exam. AS level biology. Food Tests. Food Tests. What is Benedict's Test for Reducing Sugars?. What are reducing sugars?. Reducing sugars. What is the procedure for the Benedict's Test for reducing sugars?.