Overview Before lunch Majoritarian and consensus democracy Varieties of electoral systems Winnertakeall Proportional representation Mixed Dimensions for evaluating institutions Normative ID: 273151
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Electoral Systems" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Electoral SystemsSlide2
Overview: Before lunch
Majoritarian
and consensus democracy?
Varieties
of electoral systems:
Winner-take-all
Proportional representation
Mixed
Dimensions
for evaluating
institutions
Normative
Positive
Endogenous electoral rulesSlide3
Overview: After lunch
The complex relationship between social cleavages, issue preferences, electoral systems, and party systemsSlide4
Lijphart
Westminster
Consensus Democracy
1) Concentrated executive power Power sharing in the executive (coalition)
2) Cabinet Dominance Executive/Legislative Balance
3) 2-party
Multiparty
4) Plurality Elections
Proportional
Representation
5) Pluralist interest groups Corporatism, peak associations, etc.
6) Unitary
Decentralized
7) Unicameral legislature Strong Bicameralism
8) Constitutional Flexibility Constitutional Rigidity
9) No judicial review
Strong
role for judicial review
10) Central Bank controlled by Central Bank independence
executiveSlide5Slide6
SMDP Systems
A
single-member district plurality (SMDP) system
is one in which individuals cast a single vote for a candidate in a single-member district. The candidate with the most votes wins.
Examples: United Kingdom, India, Canada, Nigeria, ZambiaSlide7
How does SMDP work?Slide8
The Alternative Vote
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/interactive/2010/may/10/proportional-representation-alternative-vote-plusSlide9Slide10
Two-Round Systems
A
two-round system
(TRS) has the potential for two rounds of elections.
Candidates or parties are automatically elected in the first round if they obtain a specified level of votes, typically an absolute majority.
If no candidate or party wins this level of votes, then a second round of elections takes place.
Those candidates or parties that win the most votes in the second round are elected.Slide11
Who would win
Aberconwy
under TRS?Slide12
Two-Round Systems
Examples:
Most presidential elections in Latin America
French legislative and presidential electionsSlide13
Proportional Electoral Systems
A
proportional
, or
proportional representation
,
electoral system
is a quota- or divisor-based electoral system employed in multimember districts.
The rationale behind PR systems is to produce a proportional translation of votes into seats.
Proportional electoral systems can be divided into those that use party lists and those that do not.Slide14
Proportional Representation
How would a PR system work in the UK?Slide15
Votes and Seats, May 2010Slide16
List PR
In a
list PR system
, each party presents a list of candidates for a multimember district.
Parties receive seats in proportion to their overall share of the votes.
These seats are then shared among candidates on the list in various ways.Slide17
List PR
List PR systems differ in important ways:
The precise formula used to allocate seats to parties
The district magnitude
The use of electoral thresholds
The type of party list employed. Slide18
Divisors, etc.
Some are more proportional, some more friendly to larger partiesSlide19
District Magnitude
However, the key variable for determining the proportionality of an electoral system is the district magnitude.
The
district magnitude
is the number of representatives elected in a district.
The larger the district magnitude, the greater the degree of proportionality.Slide20
District Magnitude
Although all PR systems use multimember districts, the average size of these districts can vary quite a lot.
In the Netherlands and Slovakia, the average district magnitude is 150.
In Chile, the average district magnitude is 2.Slide21
Additional details about PR
Thresholds (e.g. Germany)
Open vs. Closed ListsSlide22
Types of Party List
In a
closed party list
, the order of candidates elected is determined by the party itself, and voters are not able to express a preference for a particular candidate.
In an
open party list
, voters can indicate not just their preferred party but also their favored candidate within that party.Slide23
Closed Party List
The electoral formula determines how many seats a party wins.
In a closed list system, these party seats are allocated according to the order of the party list.
Example: If a party wins 10 seats, then the top 10 candidates on the party list are elected.Slide24Slide25
Open Party List
The electoral formula determines how many seats a party wins.
In an open list system, these party seats are allocated according to whichever party candidates win the most votes.
Example: If a party wins 10 seats, then the top 10 vote-winners on the party list are elected.Slide26Slide27
Closed versus open list
Implications?Slide28
Mixed Electoral Systems
An
electoral tier
is a level at which votes are translated into seats.
The lowest electoral tier is the district level. Higher tiers are constituted by grouping together lower tier constituencies; they are typically at the regional or national level.
Many mixed electoral systems have multiple electoral tiers, with majoritarian formulas used in a lower tier and proportional formulas used in a higher tier.Slide29
So what?
Dimensions for evaluating electoral institutionsSlide30
Dimensions for analyzing democratic institutions
Protection of liberty
Protection of minorities
Decisiveness, especially under stress
Credibility of commitments
Stability
Quality of democracy
Representativeness
Accountability
Rent-
seeking and corruptionSlide31
Dimensions for analyzing democratic institutions (cont.)
Public versus private goods
Broad versus targeted programs and expenditures
The extent of redistribution
Budget deficits
Size of government as a share of GDPSlide32
Protection of liberty
PR and minoritiesSlide33
Decisiveness?
Are coalition governments less decisive?
What about minority governments?Slide34
Credibility of commitments?
Again, coalition versus single-party governmentSlide35
Stability
Weimar Germany?Slide36
Quality of DemocracySlide37
Representativeness
What can go wrong under PR?
What can go wrong under SMDP?Slide38
Accountability
Clarity of responsibility
How important are districts?Slide39
Corruption
Barriers to entry
Party listsSlide40
Public vs. private goods, broad vs. targeted policies
Geography and marginal districts
Core support vs. swing district models.
Do small districts encourage pork?Slide41
Endogenous electoral rules
Functionalist arguments about social heterogeneity
Colonial and historical legacies
Strategic elites
Boix
Calvo
Strategic fools?