/
Four decades of outcome research on psychotherapies for adult depression: Four decades of outcome research on psychotherapies for adult depression:

Four decades of outcome research on psychotherapies for adult depression: - PowerPoint Presentation

SmoochieBoochie
SmoochieBoochie . @SmoochieBoochie
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-08-01

Four decades of outcome research on psychotherapies for adult depression: - PPT Presentation

Whats next Norwegian Psychological Association Oslo September 2 nd 2016 Pim Cuijpers Overview What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression The effects Comparisons between psychotherapies ID: 931755

cuijpers depression treatments psychotherapies depression cuijpers psychotherapies treatments effects psychiatry effective psychotherapy adult therapy comparisons trials treatment overview characteristics

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Four decades of outcome research on psyc..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Four decades of outcome research on psychotherapies for adult depression:

What's next?

Norwegian Psychological Association,

Oslo, September 2

nd 2016

Pim

Cuijpers

Slide2

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patientsCharacteristics of therapiesOther outcomes

Causes of overestimation of the effectsThe need for new treatmentsNew directionsConclusions

Slide3

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons with other psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomesCauses of overestimation of the effects

The need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide4

Methods

Database RCTs on therapies for depression>60 published meta-analysesMethods: Cuijpers et al., BMC Psychiatry 2008; 8: 36.Data can be downloaded by other researchers: www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org

Overview: Cuijpers et al., Nord J Psychiatry 2011Not only significance, but also size of effect:Small: d=0.20 NNT=8.93

Moderate: d=0.50 NNT=3.62Large: d=0.80 NNT=2.34

Threshold for clinical relevance: d=0.24 (Cuijpers et al., Depr Anx, 2014)

Slide5

Freely available at:

http://bit.do/meta-analysis

Slide6

Randomized trials on psychotherapies for adult depression (N=400)

Cuijpers et al., Curr Opin Psychiatry 2015

Slide7

440 randomized trials

Effects of different psychotherapies versus control groupsDirect comparisons between major types of psychotherapy with other psychotherapiesDirect comparisons of psychotherapy with pharmacotherapyComparisons of psychotherapy with combined treatment

Comparisons of pharmacotherapy with combined treatmentRandomized trials on psychotherapy for inpatientsDirect comparisons of individual and group therapy

Direct comparisons of face-to-face therapy with guided self-helpRandomized trials on self-guided therapy for depression

Slide8

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomesCauses of overestimation of the effects

The need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide9

440 randomized trials

Effects of different psychotherapies versus control groupsDirect comparisons between major types of psychotherapy with other psychotherapiesDirect comparisons of psychotherapy with pharmacotherapyComparisons of psychotherapy with combined treatment

Comparisons of pharmacotherapy with combined treatmentRandomized trials on psychotherapy for inpatientsDirect comparisons of individual and group therapy

Direct comparisons of face-to-face therapy with guided self-helpRandomized trials on self-guided therapy for depression

Slide10

Effects of psychotherapies compared to control groups

N

d

NNT

CBT

159

0.60

3

Behavioral activation

11

0.82

2

Interpersonal Psychother.

22

0.67

3

Problem-solving therapy

21

0.48

4

Supportive therapy

17

0.52

4

Psychodynamic therapy

8

0.44

4

MBCT

6

0.733Other510.703

p for difference is 0.71

Slide11

Different types of control groups (only CBT)

N

d

NNT

Waiting list

55

0.83

2

Care as usual

26

0.59

3

Pill placebo and others

13

0.51

4

p for difference is 0.003

Slide12

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomesCauses of overestimation of the effects

The need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide13

Main psychotherapies for adult depression

Cognitive behavior therapyBehavioral activation therapyInterpersonal psychotherapyProblem solving therapyPsychodynamic therapyNon-directive supportive counselingSocial skills training

Families or types of therapy?Difficult to assess from papers which type of therapy is used

Cuijpers et al., J Consult Clin Psychol 2008

Slide14

Differences between psychotherapies?

N

d

NNT

CBT vs all other

56

0.03

167

Supportive vs all other

30

-0.17 *

10

Behavioral Activ. vs all other

21

0.14

13

Psychodynamic vs all other

16

-0.07

25

PST vs all other

7

0.40

5

IPT vs all other

8

0.21 *

8

Social Skills vs all other

7

0.0536Cuijpers et al., J Consult Clin Psychol 2008;Barth et al., Plos Med 2013

Slide15

Slide16

Comparative effects of psychotherapies

Barth et al., Plos Med 2013

Slide17

EFFECTIVE THERAPIES OR EFFECTIVE MECHANISMSIN TREATMENT GUIDELINES FOR DEPRESSION?

If all therapies are (about) equally effective, why not focus on effective mechanisms?Universal / non-specific mechanisms may explain thatSo many possible mediators/moderators that there are therapy specific mechanisms but they are not seenIf effects are comparable that is not automatically evidence for universal mechanismsThe evidence for causal mechanisms is very weak

Safe choice is evidence based therapies: CBT, IPT, but also BA

Cuijpers et al., Depress Anx 2013

Slide18

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomesCauses of overestimation of the effects

The need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide19

Comparisons with pharmacotherapy

N

d

NNT

Psychotherapy vs pharmacotherapy

37

-0.07

25

Psychotherapy vs combined treatment

19

0.35

5

Pharmacotherapy vs combined treatment

22

0.30

6

Psychotherapy + pharmaco-therapy vs PSY+ placebo

16

0.25

7

Cuijpers et al., J Clin Psychiatry 2008; 2009; 2010; Depress Anx 2008; Acta Psychiatrica Scand 2009; World Psychiatry 2013; 2014

Slide20

PSYchotherapy vs adm in mood and anxiety

67 trials (40 depression; 27 anxiety disorders)In mood and anxiety disordersPsychotherapy less effective in dysthymia (g=-0.30)Psychotherapy more effective in OCD (g=0.64)Counseling less effective than pharmacotherapy (g=-0.33)TCAs less effective than psychotherapies (g=0.21)

Remains significant in multivariate metaregression analyses, except for dysthymia

Cuijpers et al., World Psychiatry, 2013

Slide21

Are treatments of depression effective? a)

Cohen’s dNNTPharmacotherapy b)

0.315.75Psychotherapy c)0.257.14

Combined therapyd)0.523.50

a) Only comparisons with pill placebob) Based on Turner et al., Nw Engl J Med 2008; adjusted for publication biasc) Cuijpers et al., Psychol Med 2013 (N=12)d) Data from our database, not (yet) published; only combined versus placebo (N=6)

Slide22

11 studies with PLA - PSY – PHA - COMB

Ng95% CINNTCOMB vs placebo110.74

0.48~1.013PHA vs COMB110.370.12~0.63

5PHA vs placebo110.35

0.21~0.495PSY vs COMB110.380.16~0.595PSY vs placebo110.370.11~0.645

Cuijpers et al., World Psychiatry 2013

Slide23

Long term outcomes (post-randomization)

NORTherapy vs control (acute)

response at >6 mn221.96

1.50~2.55response at >12

mn111.591.14~2.21Therapy vs contr. (respnd)

Sustained

resp. >6 mn

16

2.37

1.78~3.14

Sustained

resp. >2 yr

6

2.19

1.17~4.09

No relapse >6 mn

11

3.34

1.60~3.41

No relapse >12 mn

5

2.46

1.26~4.82

Karyotaki et al., 2014

Slide24

Long-term effects

Acute CBT with (almost) no maintenance vs discontinued pharmacotherapy, at 12 months follow-up (N=8):OR = 2.61 (95% CI: 1.58~4.31), p<0.001Acute CBT with (almost) no maintenance vs maintenance pharmacotherapy, at 12 months follow-up (N=5):OR = 1.62 (95% CI: 0.97~2.72), p=0.07NNT = 9.5

Cuijpers et al., BMJ open 2013

Slide25

Long term outcomes (post-randomization)

NORCombined vs ADM

response at >6 months122.72

1.83~4.04response at >12 months

82.721.50~4.96Combined vs PSYresponse at >6 months

7

1.30

0.76~2.22

Karyotaki et al., 2014

Slide26

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomesCauses of overestimation of the effects

The need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide27

Effect sizes per target group (N=295)

Ng95% CINNTAdults in general144

0.760.67~0.842Older adults400.700.54~0.85

3Students170.95

0.67~1.232Women with PPD230.640.43~0.853General medical

37

0.64

0.49~0.80

3

Other

34

0.60

0.43~0.77

3

p for difference: 0.26

Cuijpers et al., 2006; 2008; 2009; 2014;

Van Straten et al., 2011

Slide28

Settings

NgNNTPrimary care20

0.316referral11

0.434systematic screening

70.1314Inpatients150.296

Cuijpers et al., Br J Gen Pract 2009;

Cuijpers et al., Clin Psychol Rev 2010

Slide29

Clinical characteristics

NgNNTComorbid alcohol

depression150.27

7alcohol

150.17106-12 months depression80.26

7

6-12 months alcohol

9

0.31

6

Chronic depression/dysthymia

versus control

8

0.23

8

versus ADM

10

-0.31

6

COMB vs ADM

9

0.23

8

COMB vs psychotherapy

4

0.45

4

Subclinical depression

18

0.35

5Riper et al., Addiction 2014; Cuijpers et al., Clin Psychol Rev 2010; Br J Psychiatry 2014

Slide30

Other characteristics

Proportion ethnic minorities: no associationNo association between outcome and baseline severityIn low- and middle income countries (depression & anxiety)17 studiesBrazil, Uganda (4), Turkey, Pakistan, China (2), Cambodia, India, Iran (1) g: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.76~1.28); NNT=1.89

Depression (8 studies): ES=1.07 (95% CI: 0.71~1.43): NNT=1.82

Ünlü et al., Psychiatr Serv 2014; Driessen et al., J Consult Clin Psychol 2010; Van

‘t Hof et al., 2011

Slide31

Individual patient data meta-analyses

16 trials comparing CBT with ADM and pill placeboN>1800 patientsModerators:No difference between men and womenNo association between baseline severity and outcomeNo association between other sociodemographics and outcome

No difference between ADM and CBT in melancholia or atypical depressionSleep is not a predictor or moderator of outcome

Cuijpers et al., Depress Anx 2014; Weitz et al., JAMA Psychiatry 2015

Slide32

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomesCauses of overestimation of the effects

The need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide33

Treatment format (N=295)

NgNNTIndividual133

0.713Group108

0.733Guided self-help

410.713Mixed/other130.623

p for difference: 0.92

Slide34

Differences between formats?

Direct comparisons Individual vs group : N= 19; d = 0.20; p<0.01; NNT = 9 (individual is superior)Drop-out is higher in group: OR=0.56; p<0.01Internet-based therapies is effective compared to control groups (12 studies)With support: large effects (d=0.61)Without support: small effects (d=0.25)

Effects of self-guided therapy are smaller: 7 large trials d=0.28, NNT=6Direct comparisons between GSH and FTF therapies for depression/anxiety (21 studies): no difference

Cuijpers

et al., Eur J Psychiatry 2008; Psychol Med, 2010; Plos One 2011; Spek et al., Psychol Med 2007; Andersson & Cuijpers, 2009; Andrews et al., Plos One 2010;

Slide35

Treatment intensity

70 studies on individual therapiesOnly small association between number of sessions and treatment effectNegative association between length of treatment and outcomeStrong positive association between number of sessions per week and outcomeTwo in stead of 1 session per week would increase effect size with 0.45Sessions per week remained significant in multivariate metaregression analysis

Cuijpers

et al., JAD 2013

Slide36

Number of sessions

Slide37

Number of sessions per week

Slide38

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomesCauses of overestimation of the effects

The need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide39

Other outcomes

N

d

NNT

Quality of life

31

0.33

6

Suicidality

4

0.12 n.s.

15

Hopelessness

18

1.10

2

Social functioning

31

0.46

4

Social support

15

0.38

5

Mental health children

7

0.40

5

Mother-child interaction

8

0.355Parental functioning50.673Cuijpers et al., Ment H Phys Act 2014; EACP 2015; Renner et al., Psychol Med 2013; Park et al., COTR 2015; Kolovos, Br J Psychiatry, in press

Slide40

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons with other psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomesCauses of overestimation of the effects

The need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide41

RISK of bias

p for difference: <0.001Risk of bias

NgNNT

0 (high)

151.0621

118

0.88

2

2

45

0.81

2

3

33

0.69

3

4 (low)

84

0.47

4

See also:

Cuijpers et al., Psychol Med 2010

Slide42

Publication bias?

Duvall & Tweedie’s trim & fill procedure:Unadjusted effect size: d=0.67Adjusted effect size: d=0.42 (p<0.001)Imputed studies: 51Other tests: Begg & Mazumdar; Egger’s testVery significant results (p<0.001)No indication for publication bias in IPT

Cuijpers et al., Br J

Psychiatry 2010

Slide43

Publication bias? Unadjusted

Slide44

Publication bias? Adjusted

Slide45

A better estimate of the effects (All therapies)

Ng

NNTAll studies

295

0.713No waiting list161

0.58

3

Low risk

of bias

62

0.39

5

Adjusted for publ. bias

74

0.31

6

Slide46

A better estimate of the effects (CBT)

Ng

NNTAll studies

159

0.713No waiting list77

0.54

3

Low risk

of bias

34

0.39

5

Adjusted for publ. bias

38

0.34

5

Slide47

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomes

Causes of overestimation of the effectsThe need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide48

Effective treatments are available

Evidence-based treatments are available: CBT and other psychotherapies, pharmacotherapy, othersConsiderable improvements in treatmentComparable effects in mental health as in general medical field (Leucht, Br J Psychiatry 2012)

Slide49

But

Only 1/3 of disease burden reduced by treatments (Andrews et al., 2004)High relapse (~50% in 2 years, ~80% in 5 years)Treatments not more effective then 40 years ago

Most progress: how to apply the treatmentsPrevalence does not go down with more treatment

Treatment

effects are overestimatedPublication biasLow quality of studiesResearcher allegianceUnderserved populations and access

Slide50

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomes

Causes of overestimation of the effectsThe need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide51

Research priorities

Better understanding of depression (heterogeneity, comorbidity, aetiology, staging)Better diagnostic toolsBetter treatments: but how?

Slide52

We do not need

No new therapies for acute treatmentTo examine superiority: trials of ~1000 patientsNo trials examining different treatment formatsNo trials comparing different therapies

No trials examing therapies in specific target groupsUnless there is a convincing reason

Slide53

We DO need

Prevention of depression (reduction of incidence 20-25%)Improvement of treatments:Focus on chronic, treatment resistant depression (e.g., CBASP)Focus on relapseWho benefits from which treatment?

How do treatments work? But also how does natural recovery work and how can that be stimulated? Scaling up and simplifying treatmentsLay health counselors

Group therapiesGuided self-help/Internet-based/telephone therapies are equally effective

Cuijpers et al., Am J Psychiatry, Van Zoonen et al., J Clin Epidem 2014; Cuijpers, Curr Opin Psychiatry 2015; World Psychiatry in press

Slide54

Overview

What have we learned about psychotherapies for adult depression?The effectsComparisons between psychotherapiesComparisons with ADMCharacteristics of patients

Characteristics of therapiesOther outcomes

Causes of overestimation of the effectsThe need for new treatments

New directionsConclusions

Slide55

Overall conclusions

40 years of research on psychotherapy for depression has resulted in a huge body of knowledgePsychotherapies are effective, but less effective than we thought for a long timeBetter at the longer termIt is effective in many target groups and settingsBut we need to improve treatments, not by developing new ones, but by

focusing on prevention, chronic depression and relapsescaling up and simplifying treatments

Slide56

Thank you for your attention!

Contact: p.cuijpers@vu.nl