1 Chapter 8 CorporateLevel Strategy PART III CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE The Strategic Management Process CorporateLevel Strategy Key Terms Corporatelevel strategy S pecifies ID: 717379
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Competing for Advantage" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Competing for Advantage
1
Chapter 8Corporate-Level Strategy
PART III
CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGESlide2
The Strategic Management ProcessSlide3Corporate-Level
StrategyKey TermsCorporate-level strategy Specifies actions a firm takes to gain a competitive advantage by selecting and managing a portfolio of businesses that compete in different product markets or industriesSlide4Five Elements of StrategySlide5
Product DiversificationPrimary form of corporate-level strategyConcerns scope of industries and markets Defines approach to buying, creating, and selling
businesses Intends to reduce variability in profitability Comes with development and monitoring
costsSlide6Levels and Types of Diversification Slide7Low Levels of Diversification
Key TermsSingle business strategy Corporate-level strategy in which the firm generates 95% or more of its sales revenue from its core business areaDominant
business diversification strategy Corporate-level strategy in which the firm generates between 70% and 95% of its total sales revenue
within a single business areaSlide8
Moderate Levels of DiversificationKey TermsRelated diversification strategy Corporate-level strategy in which the firm generates more than 30% of its sales revenue outside a dominant business and whose businesses are related to each other in some manner
Related constrained diversification strategyRelated diversification strategy characterized by direct links between the firm's
business unitsRelated linked diversification strategy Related diversification strategy characterized by only a few links between the firm’s business unitsSlide9
High Levels of DiversificationKey TermsUnrelated diversification strategy Corporate-level strategy for highly diversified firms in which there are no well-defined relationships between business units Slide10
Relationship between Diversification and Performance Slide11Reasons for Diversification Slide12
Value-Creating Strategies of Diversification Slide13
Diversification and the Multidivisional StructureKey TermsMultidivisional structure (M-form) Organizational structure which ties together several operating divisions, each representing a separate business or profit center to which responsibility for daily operations and business-unit strategy is delegatedSlide14Original Benefits of the M-form
It enabled corporate officers to more accurately monitor the performance of each business, which simplified the problem of control.It facilitated comparisons between divisions, which improved the resource allocation process.It stimulated managers of poorly performing divisions to look for ways of improving performance. Slide15
Organizational ControlsKey TermsOrganizational controls Management tool which indicates how to compare actual results with expected results and
suggests corrective actions to take when the difference between actual and expected results is unacceptableStrategic controls
Subjective criteria intended to verify that the firm is using appropriate strategies for the conditions in the external environment and given the company's competitive advantages Financial controls Objective criteria used to measure firm performance against previously established quantitative standardsSlide16
Variations of the M-formCooperativeStrategic business-unit (SBU)Competitive Slide17
Related DiversificationKey TermsEconomies of scope Cost savings that the firm creates by successfully transferring some of its capabilities and competencies that were developed in one of its businesses to another of its businesses
Synergy Conditions that exist when the value created by business units working together exceeds the value those same units create working
independentlySlide18
Operational Relatedness: Sharing ActivitiesPositive Outcomes:Increased Value CreationImproved Financial ReturnsReduced Risk
Challenges:Linked OutcomesConflict Between DivisionsCoordination CostsSlide19
The Cooperative Form of the Multidivisional StructureKey TermsCooperative form Organizational structure using horizontal integration to bring about interdivisional cooperationSlide20
Cooperative Form of the Multidivisional Structure Slide21
Integrating Mechanisms of the Cooperative Form of the Multidivisional Structure Centralization StandardizationFormalizationSlide22
Success Factors of the Cooperative Form of the Multidivisional Structure Information processing among divisions Strategic controlsReward systemsManagerial commitment levelsSlide23
Corporate Relatedness: Transferring Core CompetenciesKey TermsCorporate-level core competencies Complex sets of resources and capabilities that link different businesses, primarily through managerial and technological knowledge, experience, and expertiseSlide24
Corporate Relatedness: Transferring Core CompetenciesElimination of duplicate effortsResource intangibilitySlide25
The Strategic Business-Unit Form of the Multidivisional StructureKey TermsStrategic business-unit form Form of multidivisional organization structure with three levels used to support the implementation of a diversification strategySlide26
Three Levels of the SBU FormCorporate headquartersStrategic business unitsDivisions within each SBUSlide27
SBU Form of the Multidivisional StructureSlide28
Market Power through Related DiversificationMultimarket CompetitionVertical IntegrationSlide29
Market Power through Multipoint Competition Key TermsMarket power Exists when
a firm is able to price and sell its products above the existing competitive level or to reduce costs of value chain activities
and support functions below the competitive level, or bothMultimarket (or multipoint) competition Exists when two or more diversified firms simultaneously compete in the same product or geographic marketsSlide30
Market Power through Vertical IntegrationKey TermsVertical integration Exists when a company produces its own inputs or owns its own source(s)
of output distribution Taper integration
Exists when a firm sources inputs externally from independent suppliers as well as internally within the boundaries of the firm, or disposes of its outputs through independent outlets in addition to company-owned distribution channelsSlide31
Sources of Market Powerthrough Vertical IntegrationReduced operational costsReduced market costsImproved product qualityProtected technology (from imitation)
Invaluable ties between assetsSlide32
Limitations of Vertical IntegrationOutside supplier may produce inputs at a lower cost.Bureaucratic costs may occur.Substantial investments may be required, which lessen flexibility.Changes in demand can create a capacity imbalance and coordination problems. Slide33
Simultaneous Operational and Corporate Relatedness“Diseconomies” of Scope or Competitive AdvantageSlide34
Process and Integrating MechanismsFrequent and direct contact between division managersLiaisonsTemporary teams or task forcesFormal integration departmentsSlide35
Simultaneous Operational and Corporate RelatednessKey TermsMatrix organization Organizational structure in which a dual structure combines both functional specialization and business product or project specialization.Slide36Unrelated Diversification
Key TermsFinancial economiesCost savings realized through improved allocations of financial resources based on investments inside or outside the firmSlide37
Financial Economies that Create ValueEfficient internal capital allocationAsset restructuring of purchased corporations Slide38
Efficient Internal Capital Market AllocationCorporate office distributes capital to business divisionsRequires detailed and accurate informationExternal sources of capital have imperfect information about the organizationMinor corrections to capital allocations are possibleCapital allocations can be based on specific criteriaSlide39
The “Conglomerate Discount”Stock markets value diversified manufacturing conglomerates at 20% less than the value of the sum of their parts.The discount applies despite economic influences.Only extraordinary manufacturers can defy it (for a while).Slide40
The Downside ofUnrelated DiversificationAttention and resources are focused on acquisitions rather than innovations.Conglomerates in developed countries have short life cycles.Slide41Restructuring Strategy
Success usually calls for a focus on mature, low-technology businesses with more certain demand and less reliance on valuable human resources.Service businesses oriented toward clients are difficult to buy/sell because of their sales orientation and the mobility of sales people. Slide42
The Competitive Form of the Multidivisional Structure Key TermsCompetitive form Organizational structure in which the firm's divisions are completely independentSlide43
Competitive Form of the Multidivisional Structure Slide44
Benefits of Internal CompetitionCreates flexibilityChallenges inertia Motivates employeesSlide45
HQ Role in the Competitive Form of the Multidivisional Structure Maintains a distant relationship from divisionsPrimarily uses financial controls to monitor performance Focuses on cash flow, resource allocation
, performance appraisal, and the legal aspects of acquisitionsSlide46
Characteristics of Various Structural Forms
Structural Characteristics
Cooperative M-Form
SBU
M-Form
Competitive M-Form
Degree of
Centralization
Centralized at
Corporate Office
Partially Centralized
in SBUs
Decentralized
to Divisions
Use of
Integrating
Mechanisms
Extensive
Moderate
Nonexistent
Type of
Strategy
Related-
Constrained
Related-
Linked
Unrelated
DiversificationSlide47
Characteristics of Various Structural Forms
Divisional
Incentive
Compensation
Linked to
Corporate
Performance
Linked to
Corporate
SBU & Division Performance
Linked to
Division
Performance
Divisional
Performance
Appraisal
Subjective
Strategic
Criteria
Strategic &
Financial
Criteria
Objective Financial
Criteria
Structural Characteristics
Cooperative M-Form
SBU
M-Form
Competitive M-FormSlide48
Value-Neutral Incentives to DiversifyExternalAntitrust regulationTax laws Internal Low performance
Cash flow uncertaintySynergyRisk managementSlide49
Resources and DiversificationFinancial ResourcesTangible ResourcesIntangible ResourcesSlide50
Managerial Motives to Diversify Increased compensationReduced employment riskEmpire buildingSlide51
Governance MechanismsInternal corporate governanceExternal market for corporate controlExternal market for managerial talentManager reputationSlide52
Summary Model - Relationship between Diversification and Performance Slide53
Ethical Question Assume that you overheard the following statement: “Those managing an unrelated diversified firm face far more difficult ethical challenges than do those managing a dominant business firm.” Based on your reading of this chapter, do you believe this statement true or false? Why?Slide54
Ethical Question Is it ethical for managers to diversify a firm rather than return excess earnings to shareholders? Provide reasoning to support your answer.Slide55
Ethical Question Are ethical issues associated with the use of strategic controls? With the use of financial controls? If so, what are they?Slide56
Ethical Question Are ethical issues involved in implementing the cooperative and competitive M-forms? If so, what are they? As a top-level manager, how would you deal with them?Slide57
Ethical Question What unethical practices might occur when a firm restructures the assets it has acquired through its diversification efforts? Explain. Slide58
Ethical Question Do you believe that ethical managers are unaffected by the managerial motives to diversify discussed in this chapter? If so, why? In addition, do you believe that ethical managers should help their peers learn how to avoid making diversification decisions on the basis of the managerial motives to diversify (e.g., increased compensation)? Why or why not?