PPT-Approach to

crisis for family physicians amp use of the BATHE ing our patients Eric Wooltorton MD MSc CCFP FCFP uOttawa Department of Family Medicine Sept 29 2015 Nov 17 2015 Jan 12 2016. “There is nothing in a caterpillar that tells you it’s going to be a butterfly.”. OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP. General objective: . Explaining the strength-based . approach. Providing the participants with tools. Unconscious unresolved conflicts from childhood. By the end of this topic, you should be able to:. Describe. the main assumptions of the psychodynamic approach to psychology. Describe. . the three parts of the mind as proposed by Freud: the id, the ego, and the superego . Learning objectives. By the end of this lecture you should:. Be able to assess whether the behaviorist movement represented a Kuhnian revolution. Have an understanding of the neo-behaviorist and radical behaviorist approach to psychology. Today’s Lesson. Learn how to evaluate an approach. Highlight some strengths and weaknesses of the behaviourist approach. Assessment Objectives. What is AO2?. Evaluation, analysis, comparing and contrasting. Dr Tim Taylor. Interdisciplinary Ethics Applied Centre, University of Leeds. Political Studies Association Conference, 31 March 2015. The Context. Governments and international organisations are increasingly recognising the limitations of purely economic measures and are looking to measure well-being for the purposes of informing public policy and/or assessing its success.. Acceptance Approach. Adaptation Approach. Why do people live near Hazards?. If it happens, it happens, and it’s all part of living in this area.. FATALISTIC APPROACH. “Russian Roulette”- an optimistic approach.. Derek Hoiem. Beckman Institute, UIUC. * unpublished *. Scene Understanding: What We Have. DOG. GROUND. TENT. 7. Scene Understanding: What We Have (More Realistically). CAR. GROUND. 7. Scene Understanding: What We Want. Individual . Diffrences. Evaluation – strengths . Strength. Evidence. Aims to look at the motivations behind behaviour (what causes people to behave the way they do). . E.g. in Griffiths,. the ‘thinking aloud’ aimed to see their irrational reasoning, showing how different types of gambler use different heuristics.. Yvette Hoskings-James. Private Sector Negotiations-Similarities with International Treaty/Convention Negotiations. Complex. Financial Implications. Technical Issues. Multiparty. International/Multicultural. in A deep sea mining context. Outline. 2. 3. What . is the. P. recautionary . principle?. 4. Precautionary Principle. Higher . level of environmental protection through precautionary decision-making in the case of . 1. Approach Lighting System (ALS). The ALS is an . airport lighting . system that projects light in . a directional pattern . to help a pilot (. i. ) identify a runway and (ii) align . the aircraft with the runway on . Zhe. Zhang, Kin Hong Wong*, . Zhiliang. . Zeng. , Lei Zhu. Department of Computer Science and Engineering. The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Contact: *khwong@cse.cuhk.edu.hk. ANN approach to visual tracking, MVA17 v.7g. Lesson 3. Test: research methods. Objectives:. You will be able to. Outline the assumptions of the humanistic approach. Outline and evaluate humanistic qualitative methods. Evaluate the contribution of humanistic approach in terms of strength, limitations, applications and ethical issues. . Adaptation Approach. Why do people live near Hazards?. If it happens, it happens, and it’s all part of living in this area.. FATALISTIC APPROACH. “Russian Roulette”- an optimistic approach.. Some communities would go as far as to say hazards are “God’s will”..