PPT-Q uestions, Claims and Evidence: Teaching Argumentation in

Brian Hand University of Iowa Discussion format Theoretical perspectives Randomized field trail results Classroom aspects Next Generation Science Standards Scientific and Engineering Practices. . China Debate Education Network: . Claims and Evidence. A . claim is the main point or the thesis of an argument. .. Arguers . try to convince audiences and adjudicators to accept their claims. .. Claims . Reading to learn in . all. content areas. When you think of an argument, you probably. think of something like the following:. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnTmBjk-M0c. What argument ISN’T. Argument (argumentation) is a method that. Objectives:. Students will have a basic understanding of the history of formal argumentation.. Students will compare and contrast disagreement and contradiction to argumentation and debate.. Students will summarize the definition of an argument.. Douglas Walton. CRRAR. Coimbra, March 24, 2011. Need for Logic of Argumentation. The field of argumentation studies needs to be based on some model of logical reasoning. .. . Although deductive and inductive models of reasoning are useful in some instances, there is a growing consensus that there also needs to be some third alternative standard of correct reasoning to evaluate the strength or weakness of an everyday conversational argument. . Effect of Argumentation Scaffolds on Student Performance on Conceptual Physics Problems. INTRODUCTION. Argumentation is a key skill used to logically make decisions and solve problems [1-4].. Bing and Redish [5] investigated warrants used to argue about physics problems using mathematics.. How to make connections. What is evidence?. Factual information used to test, refine, and develop ideas. Interpretive . and . tentative. Suggestive rather than conclusive. In other words, you do not . Middle & High . School Science. Victor . Sampson. Assistant . Professor of Science . Education . School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach. Florida State University. Patrick . Enderle. Assistant in Research. The “Argumentation . &. . Advocacy” Course in . GenEd. Carol Tutzauer. Center for Educational . Innovation. Frank . Tutzauer. Department of Communication. Universit. y. at Buffalo. The Standard . CRRAR. University of Windsor . October 9, 2014. Douglas Walton. Abstract. Even though tools for identifying and . analyzing. arguments are now in wide use in the field of argumentation studies, so far there is a paucity of resources for evaluating real arguments, aside from using . Journal #. Should schools replace books with tablets. ?. Brainstorm ideas supporting your assigned side. After a 3 minute deliberation, we’ll have a class debate.. What is Historical Argumentation?. Question: What do the following things have in common?. Answer. : All of them represent argumentation in contemporary society. . Everything’s an Argument. Unit 1, Lesson 1. TASK 1 – Arguments Are Everywhere. Chapter 4. A Strategy of Control. Chapter 4. What happens in a debate is the product of choices debaters make. Far too many debaters approach a debate round from a passive perspective, believing their responsibility is to merely track and respond to what happens in the round.. ARGUMENTATION METHODS OF ARGUMENT RECONSTRUCTION Douglas Walton CRRAR FMAR, Konstanz, Sept. 21, 2012 Argumentation Schemes The current problem with trying to evaluate plausible reasoning using systems of weights with numerical values is that there can be many ways of doing this. IllinoisLearning Standardsfor Social Science-5thgradeInquirySkillsDevelopingQuestions andPlanningInquiriesConstructing EssentialQuestionsSSIS13-5Developessentiandexplain theimportance ofthe questions