/
Smoldering Myeloma: To Treat or not to Treat Ruben Niesvizky MD Smoldering Myeloma: To Treat or not to Treat Ruben Niesvizky MD

Smoldering Myeloma: To Treat or not to Treat Ruben Niesvizky MD - PowerPoint Presentation

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2019-11-03

Smoldering Myeloma: To Treat or not to Treat Ruben Niesvizky MD - PPT Presentation

Smoldering Myeloma To Treat or not to Treat Ruben Niesvizky MD Myeloma Center Myelomacenterorg run9001medcornelledu CASE A 47yearold man is diagnosed with smoldering multiple myeloma He has ID: 762642

aberrant smoldering myeloma disease smoldering aberrant disease myeloma time multiple plasma treatment protein ttp 2007 progression risk phenotypically observe

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Smoldering Myeloma: To Treat or not to T..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Smoldering Myeloma: To Treat or not to Treat Ruben Niesvizky MD Myeloma CenterMyelomacenter.orgrun9001@med.cornell.edu

CASEA 47-year-old man is diagnosed with smoldering multiple myeloma. He has 14% phenotypically aberrant plasma cells in his bone marrow and an IgG-lambda monoclonal protein measuring 3.6 gm/dl. Blood counts, renal function, and serum calcium levels are normal. He has no detectable bone lesions.  Observe and withhold treatment until his disease meets CRAB criteria ??

CASE: Observe vs TreatNo CRABIgG lambdaM-protein 3.6 gm/dl. 14% phenotypically aberrant plasma cellsEvolution of disease?Free light chains? Cytogenetics/FISH?Uninvolved Ig ?Doubling time?   No glomerular proteinuria: ? AL amyloid

Gompertzian Growth Renal Failure Myelosuppression Bone disease Hypercalcemia Mol CR, IF CR: MRD 10 5 10 9 10 12 Surviving clone Surviving clone Precursor Disorders MGUS Smoldering

Kyle R. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:2582-90

CASE: Observe vs. TreatNo CRABIgG lambdaM-protein 3.6 gm/dl. 14% phenotypically aberrant plasma cellsEvolution of disease?Free light chains?Cytogenetics/FISH?Uninvolved Ig ?Doubling time?  

Risk Factors for Disease Progression among 276 Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (1970–1995). Kyle RA et al. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2582-2590.

CASE: Observe vs. TreatNo CRABIgG lambdaM-protein 3.6 gm/dl. 14 % phenotypically aberrant plasma cellsEvolution of disease?Free light chains?Cytogenetics/FISH?Uninvolved Ig ?Doubling time?  

Risk Factors for Disease Progression among 276 Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (1970–1995). Kyle RA et al. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2582-2590.

Gating strategy for PC analysis by multiparametric flow cytometry. Pérez-Persona E et al. Blood 2007;110:2586-2592 Smoldering multiple myeloma : aberrant PCs by immunophenotype

Smoldering multiple myeloma: aberrant PCs by immunophenotype Aberrant Plasma CellsCD45 CD19 CD56 % − − ++ 50 − − − 24 −/dim − + 11 − + ++ 8 Dim − − 5 − + − 1 + Dim ++ 1 Paiva et al., Leukemia (2013) 27, 2056–2061

Time to progression in MGUS and SMM according to the percentage of immunophenotypically aberrant plasma cells. Pérez-Persona E et al. Blood 2007;110:2586-2592 ©2007 by American Society of Hematology Smoldering multiple myeloma : aberrant PCs by immunophenotype MGUS Smoldering MM

Smoldering multiple myeloma: aberrant PCs by immunophenotype Paiva et al., Leukemia (2013) 27, 2056–2061

CASE: Observe vs. TreatNo CRABIgG lambdaM-protein 3.6 gm/dl. 14% phenotypically aberrant plasma cellsEvolution of disease?Free light chains?Cytogenetics/FISH?Uninvolved Ig ?Doubling time?  

Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Kyle R. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:2582-90 IMWG Br J Haematol 2003; 21:749-57 M - protein in serum ≥ 30 g/ L AND / OR Bone Marrow clonal plasma cells ≥ 10% 10% 3% 1% No CRAB

CASE: Observe vs. TreatNo CRABIgG lambdaM-protein 3.6 gm/dl. 14% phenotypically aberrant plasma cellsEvolution of disease?Free light chains?Cytogenetics/FISH?Uninvolved Ig ?Doubling time?  

Free Light Chains as a Predictor Dispenzieri et al, Blood 2008 Jan 15;111(2):785-9. Epub 2007 Oct 17.

Kyle RA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:2582-90Dispenzieri A, et al. Blood. 2008;111:785-9 . Smoldering MM: PCs BM infiltration and serum M- component level plus sFLC ratio Gr 1:TTP 1.9 y Gr 2: TTP: 5 y Gr 3: TTP 10 y p < 0.001 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 5 10 15 Probability of Progression (%) Years No. of risk factors No. Rel risk 1 81 1 2 114 1.9 (1.2–2.9) 3 78 4.0 (2.6–6.1) PCsBM Infiltration ≥ 10% Serum M protein ≥ 3 g/ dL Serum FLC ratio < 1/8 or > 8

CASE: Observe vs. TreatNo CRABIgG lambdaM-protein 3.6 gm/dl. 14% phenotypically aberrant plasma cellsEvolution of disease?Free light chains?Cytogenetics/FISH?Uninvolved Ig ?Doubling time?  

Impact of gain 1q, del(17p13), t(4;14), and ploidy status on time to progression in patients with smoldering multiple myeloma. Neben K et al. JCO 2013;31:4325-4332 ©2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

CASE: Observe vs. TreatNo CRABIgG lambdaM-protein 3.6 gm/dl. 14% phenotypically aberrant plasma cellsEvolution of disease?Free light chains?Cytogenetics/FISH?Uninvolved Ig ?Doubling time?  

Risk Factors for Disease Progression among 276 Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (1970–1995). Kyle RA et al. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2582-2590.

Perez -Persona E, et al. Blood. 2007;110:2586-92. Smoldering multiple myeloma : aberrant PCs by immunophenotype plus immunoparesis > 95% aPC/BMPC or paresis n = 22 (10 progr.) >95% aPC/BMPC + paresis n = 39 (28 progr.) No adverse factors n = 28 (1 progr.) 120 96 72 48 24 0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Months TTP (%) Median not reached Median 73 months p = 0.003 Median 23 months 8% 42% 82%

Risk of SMM progression to active MM according to different prognostic systems as compared with risk of progression of MGUS to active MM. Gray shading includes 2-year time point. Dispenzieri A et al. Blood 2013;122:4172-4181

Ultra High Risk Smoldering

Smoldering multiple myeloma : early treatment Conventional agents Initial MP vs Deferred MP 1,2,3 No benefit in ORR/TTP/OS Novel agents Thalidomide 4,5 ~ 30% ≥ PR; high toxicity; patients achieving PR had a shorter time to treatment Bisphosphonates vs abstention 6,7 No benefit in ORR/TTP/OSLower incidence of skeletal related events 1.Hjorth M, et al. Eur J Haematol. 1993;50:95-102. 2.Grignani G, et al. Br J Cancer. 1996;73:1101-07. 3.Riccardi A, et al. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1254-60. 4. Rajkumar SV, et al. Am J Hematol 2010; 85(10):737-40 5. Barlogie B, et al. Blood. 2008;112:3122-25. 6. Musto P, et al. Leuk Lymphoma. 2011;52(5):771-7757. Musto P, et al. Cancer. 2008;113:1588-95.

ORIGINAL ARTICLELenalidomide plus Dexamethasone for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple MyelomaMaría-Victoria Mateos, M.D., Ph.D., et alN Engl J Med 2013; 369:438-447 August 1, 2013

Lenalidomide 25 mg/daily during 21d every 28 d Dexamethasone20 mg D1-D4 and D12-D15 every 28 d Therapeutic abstention Induction Nine 4-week cycles Maintenance Lenalidomide 10 mg/daily during 21 d every month* Therapeutic abstention Schedule of therapy (n:126 pts) Treatment arm (n = 60) Control arm (n = 66) * Low-dose Dex will be added at the moment of biological progression Ammendment on August 2011: Stop treatment at 2 years of treatment

Len-dex vs. no treatment: TTP to active disease (n = 119)ITT analysis Median follow-up: 32 months (range 12–49) Lenalidomide + dex Median TTP: NR 9 Progressions (15%) 5 pts:early disc followed by DP 4 pts:symptomatic DP No treatment Median TTP: 23m 37 Progressions (59%) 20 patients: bone disease 7 patients: renal failure HR: 6.0; 95% IC (2.9–12.6); p < 0.0001 Time from inclusion Proportion of patients alive

Len-dex vs. no treatment: OS from inclusion (n = 119) Median follow-up: 32 months (range 12–49) Lenalidomide + Dex No treatment Lenalidomide + Dex: 93% at 3 years No treatment: 76% at 3 years Time from inclusion Proportion of patients alive p=0.04 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

CritiqueUnbalanced armsexcess mortality in control arm: intervention only at CRAB asymptomatic biologic progression: intervention with dex (and increase the dose of lenalidomide) in the intervention group testing intensity differ between the two groups? Flow availability

CASE: Observe vs. TreatNo CRABIgG lambdaM-protein 3.6 gm/dl. 14% phenotypically aberrant plasma cells  Median TTP 75 monthsMedian TTP 117 months

Morton Coleman Roger N Pearse Tomer MarkAdriana RossiKoen Van BesienLinda Tegnestam Kathleen Pogonowski Joseph Lane Alan Weinstein Selina Chen-Kiang Monica Guzman Scott Ely John Allen Yashpal Agrawal David S. Jayabalan Stanley Goldsmith Paul Christos Susan MathewLaura Prescod MyelomaCenter. org