/
Biomarkers for personalized therapy in myeloma Biomarkers for personalized therapy in myeloma

Biomarkers for personalized therapy in myeloma - PowerPoint Presentation

tawny-fly
tawny-fly . @tawny-fly
Follow
370 views
Uploaded On 2017-12-02

Biomarkers for personalized therapy in myeloma - PPT Presentation

Mike Chapman University of Cambridge Department of Haematology Novel agents have improved survival What is a biomarker A characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes pathogenic processes or pharmacologic responses to a therapeuti ID: 611966

myeloma iss important fish iss myeloma fish important biomarkers treatment expression predictive gene amp ideal industry pharmaceutical pmp capita expenditure negative iii

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Biomarkers for personalized therapy in m..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Biomarkers for personalized therapy in myeloma

Mike Chapman

University of Cambridge Department of HaematologySlide2

Novel agents have improved survivalSlide3

What is a biomarker?

“A characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention”

For the purposes of today…

“A measurable characteristic that is predictive of the response to a therapeutic intervention”Slide4

Why is this important?

Maximizing efficacy

Minimizing risk

of side effects

Avoiding development

of resistant clones

For the patientSlide5

Why is this important?

Exponential increases in drugs spending probably not sustainable

US/Canada

per capita

medication expenditure

Health economicsSlide6

Why is this important?

Exponential increases in drugs spending probably not sustainable

Already capped in the UK?

NHS

per capita

medication expenditure (red)

US/Canada

per capita

medication expenditure

Health economicsSlide7

Why is this important?

For the pharmaceutical industrySlide8

Why is this important?

For the pharmaceutical industry

Iressa

(

gefitinib

)

Tarceva

(

erlotinib

)Slide9

Why is this important?

For the pharmaceutical industry

Iressa

(

gefitinib

)

Tarceva

(

erlotinib

)Slide10

Properties of an ideal biomarker

Cost effective

Easy to sampleSafe to sample

Easy to performReproducible in different diagnostic labsRapid processingGuides choice of treatmentSlide11

Properties of an ideal biomarker

Cost effective

Easy to sampleSafe to sample

Easy to performReproducible in different diagnostic labsRapid processingGuides choice of treatmentSlide12

International Staging System (ISS) in myeloma

Out of date

Does not reflect response to individual treatmentsSlide13

Improving ISS: ISS-FISH

ISS I/II & negative FISH

ISS III & negative FISH or

ISS I & positive FISH

ISS II/III & positive FISHSlide14

Improving ISS: Revised-ISS

ISS I AND

FISH negative AND

LDH normal

ISS III AND

FISH positive OR LDH highSlide15

Biomarkers in Multiple Myeloma?

Gene expression profiling (GEP)

Myeloma profiled by John Shaughnessy’s group

Some prognostic significance

But…

Expensive

User/batch dependent

Largely reflects

cytogenetics

Difficult to class individual samples

Clustering not robustSlide16

Biomarkers in Multiple Myeloma?

70 gene signature defined poor prognosis

Derived 17 gene signature made available as RT-PCR kit

Does not alter treatment decisions

Gene expression profilingSlide17

Additive effects of predictive microarray signatures

Incorporation of different signatures is additive for prognosis

Signatures do not predict effective treatmentSlide18

Actionable mutations: BRAFSlide19

Actionable mutations: BRAFSlide20

Vemurafenib active in myelomaSlide21

How to identify new biomarkers?

Incorporation of genomics into clinical trials

IRF4 predictive of lenalidomide

responsiveness (Myeloma XI)RNAseq signature specifically predictive of bortezomib responsiveness (PADIMAC)Sequential whole exome sequencing at diagnosis and relapse (CARDAMON)Cell surface proteomics…Slide22

Challenges for identifying novel monoclonal antibody targets

Poor correlation between mRNA expression and protein expression

Variable quality of antibodies

Difficulty quantifying proteinsDifficulty enriching for plasma membrane proteinsSlide23

Plasma membrane profiling (PMP)Slide24

PMP in myeloma: high inter-run consistency

JIM3

KMS12BMSlide25

PMP in myeloma: close correlation with flow

cytometrySlide26

Prioritizing targets

CD38Slide27

Conclusions

Need to focus on biomarkers that inform treatment decisions

Incorporation of “-omics

” technologies in clinical trials essential Monoclonal antibody therapy is ideal for personalized medicine