PPT-Świadomość: łatwy i trudny problem. Argument z wiedzy

dr hab Marcin Miłkowski prof IFiS PAN Rozkład jazdy Filozofowie o świadomości Podstawowe rozróżnienia Funkcjonalistyczne teorie świadomości Argument z wiedzy Filozofowie o świadomości. Hook . Claim. Concessions . Refutations. Support. Summary/Call to action. HOOK & CLAIM. Hook . = opening that grabs the reader’s attention and establishes a connection between the reader and writer. Understanding the Differences. Pre-Writing. Writing . Prompt. . The use of technology, especially among teenagers, has increased substantially and mobile access to the internet is pervasive. Do you think that people are too reliant on technology? Why or why not? . “Not . an inch to the west! Not an inch to the east! . I’ll stay here, not budging! I can and I . will. If . it makes you and me and the whole . world stand still. !” . --from Dr. . Suess. ’ “The . Kevin Rogers. Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 – 1860). German Philosopher. View of OA:. Sleight of hand trick. Charming joke. Bertrand Russell (1872 – 1970). “It is much easier to be persuaded that ontological arguments are no good than it is to say exactly what is wrong with them”. Phil/RS 335. Why be good?. Like the design argument, the moral argument for . God. '. s . existence seems more directly rooted in our everyday experience than the more abstract considerations which generate the ontological and cosmological arguments.. Session . 3:. Using Evidence to Build . Arguements. Argument writers…. …give compelling evidence to prove their point. . …pour over research, finding the evidence will really support their claim. Constructing . an Argument. Louise . Livesey. Academic Skills Adviser. This workshop . will:. Revisit . what an argument is. Suggest ‘types’ of argument that an assignment can be built around. Offer strategies to apply evidence and theory into your written work. Sake…. Writing . Counter-arguments and Rebuttals. ENDURING UNDERSTANDING. 1. In . order to . write a convincing essay . you may need to . anticipate common opposing arguments. . that dispute your thesis. AS. Background to the Argument. A classical theistic proof for the existence of God. Supports the concept of the God of classical theism (. omni. -words). Accepts that the cosmos is contingent upon a prior being to bring it into existence. Work from 1/8/2013. Read and annotate the following prompt, then brainstorm how you would create your argument for this essay. .. PROMPT. : In his 1985 essay "Being a Man," Paul Theroux argues that "The whole idea of manhood in America is pitiful...Even the expression "Be a man!" ...[is] insulting and abusive. It means: Be stupid, be unfeeling, obedient, soldierly and stop thinking...It is a hideous and crippling lie; it not only insists on difference and connives at superiority, it is also by its very nature destructive--emotionally damaging and socially harmful." . If that’s so, what is the argument here?. Every argument starts with a question.. So – what questions does this text inspire? . SOAPS is one way to start thinking about how to argue.. S = What is the subject?. By . Tesslyn. Mustain. 8. th. Grade RELA. Timberwood. Middle School. Used to:. Sway opinions. Gain Support. Degrade (like in a political campaign). An example of fallacies are the stories told by . “Words create ripples, and ripples can come together to make waves.” . –Michael Osborn. What will I accomplish?. 1. You will act as an advocate for a cause or point of view.. 2. You will use supporting materials as evidence that justified advice.. w . xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.  .  . . data przeprowadzenia ankiety. : styczeń 2016r. . respondenci:. 244 uczniów szkoły zawodowej. 365 uczniów technikum. 170 rodziców 45 nauczycieli .