Adrian Gardner FEMA Ivan DeLoatch FGDC OS Steering Committee Meeting February 13 2014 A16 PfM Implementation Plan Drivers OMB Circular A16 A16 Supplemental Guidance GAO Report GAO1394 ID: 780806
Download The PPT/PDF document "OMB Circular A-16 Portfolio Management I..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
OMB Circular A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan
Adrian Gardner, FEMA
Ivan DeLoatch, FGDC OS
Steering Committee Meeting
February 13, 2014
Slide2A-16 PfM Implementation Plan
Drivers:OMB Circular A-16, A-16 Supplemental GuidanceGAO Report (GAO-13-94): Geospatial Information – OMB and Agencies Need to Make Coordination a Priority to Reduce
Duplication (November 2012)National Geospatial Advisory Committee recommendationsOpen Data Policy, Digital
Government
Strategy, Open
Government Directive Process:Core team coordinating with Theme Leads and Dataset ManagersInteragency project team:Executive Champions: Adrian Gardner (FEMA), Ivan DeLoatch (FGDC)Writing Team Lead: Jen Carlino (USGA/FGDC/CSAS)
2
Slide3Core Team Members
Anne Ball (NOAA, Climate and Weather Theme)Wendy Blake-Coleman (EPA)
Jennifer Carlino (FGDC)Mark Bradford (DOT
)
Joel
Dyer (FEMA)Jim Irvine (COMSO/FGDC)Michel Kareis (GSA, Real Property Theme)
Edgar
Pedroza
(DOI)Ken Shaffer (FGDC)Brigitta Urban-Mathieux (FGDC)Chris Vaughan (FEMA)Lynda Wayne (GeoMaxim/FGDC)Kimberly Winger (FEMA)Sean Zintel (COMSO/FGDC)
3
Slide4Implementation Plan Schedule
Timeframe
Activity
…
Feb
– July 2013 actions removed for clarity
Sep 4, 2013
Implementation Plan 1st
draft released for core team review
Sep 12, 2013
Steering Committee Meeting and
request for additional representatives to work on plan Sep 20, 2013Small core team vetted approach and revised draft plan outline Oct 31, 2013Theme Leads meeting on content, actions and writing team (rescheduled from 10/2/13) Nov 13, 2013Convene core group to prepare rough draft Nov 14, 2013Convene writing team to develop 1st draft (begin weekly meetings) Nov 19, 2013Theme Lead meeting – focus on implementation steps and actions Nov 27, 2013Core group develops, 2nd draft from Theme Lead meeting input and submitted comments Dec 6, 2013Draft plan to writing team for review (Core Team comments on v7.0, 12/9 meeting to adjudicate comments) Dec 11, 2013Draft plan to Theme Leads / Coord. Group for review/comment (due 12/16, Core team adjudicates 12/17) Dec 19, 2013Draft to Executive Committee, Coordination Group, Executive Champions, for review and comment (final comments by 1/10) Jan 10-16, 2013Writing team reviews comments and updates draft Jan 17, 2014Revised draft to Steering Committee, Coordination Group, NGAC subcommittee for review/content (Due 1/28) Jan 28-Feb 11Adjudication of comments and edits Feb 11, 2014Revised Draft Final (v4) to Steering Committee - cc Coord. Group and Theme Leads (comments due Monday 2/24) Feb 13, 2014Steering Committee Meeting – discussion on plan prior to electronic vote Feb 24-28Adjudicate comments/feedback, develop Final Draft for Vote (v5) Feb 28, 2014Final Draft for Vote (v5) to Steering Committee for electronic approval vote (vote response due March 14) Mar 14-21Prepare Approved Final Document for release Mar 31, 2014Revised action due date of Steering Committee approved Implementation Plan to GAO*
*Plan implementation is supported by Geospatial Platform tools still to be developed. The plan may be revised and updated to align with actual implementation solutions as they are developed.
DRAFT 11-5-13Updated 11-25-13, 12-6-13, 12-9-13, 1-3-14, 1-10-14, 2-3-14, 2-11-14
Items in yellow are complete
4
Slide5Plan Overview
The PfM Implementation Plan outlines the approach for instituting the portfolio management process as outlined in OMB Circular A–16 Supplemental Guidance (
2010). Most of the plan will serve as the implementation plan for Goal 2 of the NSDI Strategic Plan.
The FGDC
Steering Committee will oversee the implementation
process and monitor progress.Outcomes: A robust and accessible set of core geospatial datasets, called National Geospatial Data Assets (NGDAs), which will improve mission support for Federal agencies, their partners and stakeholders. Opportunities for collaborative investments through partnerships to leverage resources, avoid duplication and enhance return on investments
5
Slide6Plan Overview cont.
Actions derived from goals and objectives from key documents, developed with extensive input from representatives from Federal agencies and a wide array of geospatial stakeholders:OMB Circular A–16, Supplemental Guidance, November 10, 2010
NSDI Strategic Plan: 2014—2016, December 2013Outlines a 3-year phased approachIncludes actions that have/are occurring to establish a framework
e.g. identifying Theme leads, registering data services, and
establishing Theme communities on the Geospatial PlatformIncludes actions for implementing and sustaining an annual process6
Slide7NGDA
PfM
Roles and Responsibilities7
Slide8PfM Process
8
Slide9Alignment with Other Policies
Agencies to ensure compliance with associated policies and reporting directivesShould be included in the Agencies’ business practices and executionFor ExampleOpen Data Policy M-13-13Mosaic effect: combining multiple information sources may pose a risk of exposing PII or other potentially sensitive informationUltimately it is the responsibility of each agency to perform the necessary analysis and comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies
9
Slide10Primary Comment Topics – to date
Common threads:Timelines (resource availability/due dates)Dataset and Theme Maturity Baseline Assessment (when available for review/completion)Connections with Agency Budget Processes (ensure clear link with Portfolio Management process and individual agency budget processes)Do not create unnecessary reporting mechanisms (leverage existing efforts)
Reviewers need to supply “content” for inputs, not just comments, to ensure issues are addressed and the plan aligns with their agency’s processes and needs
10
Slide11Agency
CG/Theme
Lead 12/11/13 Draft Review
ExCom,
CG, Exec Champs 12/19/13 Draft Review
SC, CG
1/20/14
+ Revised Draft ReviewSC, CG 2/11/2014 Revised Draft Final Review
SC Endorsement Vote 3/14/2014
DOI
x (2)
x (4)x (4)Agriculturex (2)xxCommercex (3)xDoD - NGAx*Educationx*Energyx*x*x*EPAxxGSAHHSHomeland SecurityFEMAxx (2)HUDxJusticeLaborLOCNARANASANSF
OMBxSBA
SSA
StateTransportation
x
Treasury
TVA
USACE
USAID
VA
Responding agencies
/ Number
of participating
6 /8
10 /16
4 /
7
A-16 Implementation Plan Comments Matrix
2-14-2014
Agencies highlighted in blue are part of the writing team.
*Agencies expressed support with no comments.
(#) Denotes number of responses from the Agency.
+
Three responses from NGAC
11
Slide12Ex Com Meeting, 1/28/14
Suggested slight modifications to the organization of the document within the existing framework of the Plan;Impacted the Steering Committee endorsement vote planned for the February 13th meeting - will review and discuss the updated version of the Plan
Suggested changes included:Revising the wording for the two main sections of the
document and clarifying some content
Condensing
some areas; moving some of the actions; and reworking the Priority Setting/Budget Process section to better enable the portfolio management processA few members of the ExCom met the following week to discuss additional geospatial investments more broadly and the connections with the Plan.OMB suggested including language addressing related geospatial investments other than data
12
Slide13A-16 Theme Lead Collaboration Communities
Developing 16 community storefrontsImplementing login protected collaboration areasFocused on theme/dataset coordination/development
Provide best practices, links to standards, blogs, document libraries, etc.
13
Slide1414
Slide15Next Steps
Version 4 distributed - 2/11/14To Steering Committee, Coordination Group, and Theme LeadsReviewers to comment and supply contentCoordinate information on their previous comments/content with their other agency reviewers
A single response per Steering Committee agency requestedSteering Committee and Coordination Group to provide any additional comments and content for inclusion in Version 5 by 2/24/14
Steering
Committee
electronic vote - 2/28/2014 (electronic) due 3/14/14Steering Committee approved Implementation Plan, GAO action due date – 3/31/201415
Slide16Questions?