PPT-Identifying Types of Arguments in Text:

First Steps towards an Identification Procedure November 10 2010 Douglas Walton Distinguished Research Fellow CRRAR Helping Informal Logic Students It would be helpful to have a more systematic procedure that can be used to help students of informal logic identify arguments of the kind they encounter in natural language texts. Covert Overt Kno w the arguments Summarize the arguments Reflect on the issues Share reflections on the issues Think critically Interpret, analyze, and evaluate evidence, construct arguments Envision What we’ve read about discussed so far:. Critical/“Critiquing” Thinking. Objective . & Subjective Claims. Fact & Opinion. Issue & Argument. Cogency. Reasoning. Premise . & Conclusion. Outlined by Professor . Wonser. Communication. What is communication. Content of communication. Process. Verbal. Non-verbal. Barriers to communication. Improving communication. Communication & power. Warwick Debating Society. Training, . 24. /10/2012. What commonly occurs.. Motion is announced.. Team think up arguments for . their. . side of the debate.. Team provide said arguments.. Feedback is given; . Text structures. We have talked external text structures – things like titles, headings, graphs, pictures, bolded words, indexes, tables of content, etc. They help us to use access and understand information more easily.. Curriculum links and teaching notes. L1 . Functional English and . Adult Literacy. . October 2014. . Kindly contributed . by . Samantha Dowd, Wigan.. Search . for . Samantha . on . www.skillsworkshop.org. CAS100A. Zack Furness. Argument of Definition. Defining a specific term by it membership in a . specific category or genus. . Example: . “Meat is murder” . (i.e., arguing that non-vegetarian diets are by definition murderous and so, morally wrong).. Print and modernity in translation. A grand narrative. Print is the communication technology of modernity (literacy, public education, direct access to text). Equivalence, as a direct relation between texts, is the translation ideology of print. . Professor Doron Samuel-Siegel. University of Richmond School of Law. I. Introduction. Goals . Identify discrete strategies. Aiming to. B. e deliberate, not second-nature. Refresh and/or refine. Focusing on. Finding Arguments . in a Debate. March 11, 2014, UWINDSOR. D. Walton and T. F. Gordon. CRRAR . Introduction. This . paper conducts a tour of two recently developed AI systems for argument invention, shows how they work, and explains how they can be applied to assist argumentation. . . Event. . Extraction. . and. . Event. . Schema. . Induction. Lifu. . Huang. 1. ,. . Taylor. . Cassidy. 2. ,. . Xiaocheng. . Feng. 3. ,. . Heng. . Ji. 1. ,. . Clare. . R.. . Voss. 2. ,. Page 1of 5YZING ARGUMENTSINTRODUCTIONWelcome to Laurier Librarys presentation on Identifying and Analyzing ArgumentsThis presentation will explain the steps you should take to create strong and effect Rebecca Maynard . Quote of the week . Aims & Objectives . By the end of this session all learners should:. Have an understanding of skimming and scanning.. Know the four different types of text.. English. You will need. A pen or pencil and paper.. A digital device.. Review. Reviewed the development of noun groups.. Identified nouns, verbs and adverbial phrases.. Deepened our understanding of complex sentences..