PPT-Types of Arguments

What weve read about discussed so far CriticalCritiquing Thinking Objective amp Subjective Claims Fact amp Opinion Issue amp Argument Cogency Reasoning Premise amp Conclusion. Covert Overt Kno w the arguments Summarize the arguments Reflect on the issues Share reflections on the issues Think critically Interpret, analyze, and evaluate evidence, construct arguments Envision ?. Common Arguments. Debate Preview?. Allen . Hainline. Reasonable Faith UTD. September 26, 2013. www.OriginsDiscussion.info. Let’s go out to eat with ASH after the debate. Outline. More Fine-Tuning discussion. Rebuttal. Your choice:. Definition. Evaluation. Ethical. Causal. Proposal. Definition Arguments. Edward Snowden: whistleblower or traitor?. Game of Thrones. : feminist or misogynist?. Are interns “trainees” or “employees”? The latter need to be paid! To be a “trainee”:. First Steps towards. an Identification Procedure. November 10, 2010. Douglas Walton Distinguished Research Fellow . CRRAR. Helping Informal Logic Students. It would be helpful to have a more systematic procedure that can be used to help students of informal logic identify arguments of the kind they encounter in natural language texts.. Outlined by Professor . Wonser. Communication. What is communication. Content of communication. Process. Verbal. Non-verbal. Barriers to communication. Improving communication. Communication & power. Definition Arguments. Arguments about what category something belongs to. Most common argument type you encounter.. Occur whenever a person claims that a particular person, thing, act, or phenomenon belongs (or does not belong) within a certain category. . . . Direct Realism . It is the pre-philosophical view : it is “common sense”. 2. Language implies that we perceive objects in the external physical world. . “I can see my friends, I can hear the traffic, I can taste the chicken, I can feel the wind in my face, and smell the exhaust fumes – I know I am in London”. CAS100A. Zack Furness. Argument of Definition. Defining a specific term by it membership in a . specific category or genus. . Example: . “Meat is murder” . (i.e., arguing that non-vegetarian diets are by definition murderous and so, morally wrong).. Using Toulmin Professor Doron Samuel-Siegel. University of Richmond School of Law. I. Introduction. Goals . Identify discrete strategies. Aiming to. B. e deliberate, not second-nature. Refresh and/or refine. Focusing on. . Event. . Extraction. . and. . Event. . Schema. . Induction. Lifu. . Huang. 1. ,. . Taylor. . Cassidy. 2. ,. . Xiaocheng. . Feng. 3. ,. . Heng. . Ji. 1. ,. . Clare. . R.. . Voss. 2. ,. . Structuring arguments. Defines which parts go where. Logical arguments described as:. Inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning:. Inductive reasoning. . Process of generalizing on the basis of a number of specific examples. reason. Arguments based on . observation. What are you most struggling with. ?. Write any . questions. on your post it note.. Group Quiz…. Round one: Teleological arguments. What is “Teleological argument”?. The critical reader must be able to evaluate arguments. . When you. evaluate. an argument (a set of claims), you determine its value or persuasiveness. . To be able to do a good job evaluating arguments, you need to know what an argument is and how an argument is put together. .