PPT-Chapter 2 Arguments and Argumentation

Author : cheryl-pisano | Published Date : 2018-10-30

Chapter 2 An argument is the fundamental building block of persuasion Chapter 2 Definition An argument is a collection of statements organized in a way that highlights

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chapter 2 Arguments and Argumentation" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Chapter 2 Arguments and Argumentation: Transcript


Chapter 2 An argument is the fundamental building block of persuasion Chapter 2 Definition An argument is a collection of statements organized in a way that highlights connections between those ideas to demonstrate that because some of the statements in the collection are believed to be true other statements in the collection should be accepted as true. First Steps towards. an Identification Procedure. November 10, 2010. Douglas Walton Distinguished Research Fellow . CRRAR. Helping Informal Logic Students. It would be helpful to have a more systematic procedure that can be used to help students of informal logic identify arguments of the kind they encounter in natural language texts.. Reading to learn in . all. content areas. When you think of an argument, you probably. think of something like the following:. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnTmBjk-M0c. What argument ISN’T. Argument (argumentation) is a method that. Carneades. Argumentation System. DIAGRAMMING EVIDENCE: VISUALIZING CONNECTIONS IN SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES’. University of Windsor, . April 25 & 26, 2014.. Douglas Walton . CRRAR. Middle & High . School Science. Victor . Sampson. Assistant . Professor of Science . Education . School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach. Florida State University. Patrick . Enderle. Assistant in Research. Finding Arguments . in a Debate. March 11, 2014, UWINDSOR. D. Walton and T. F. Gordon. CRRAR . Introduction. This . paper conducts a tour of two recently developed AI systems for argument invention, shows how they work, and explains how they can be applied to assist argumentation. . CRRAR. University of Windsor . October 9, 2014. Douglas Walton. Abstract. Even though tools for identifying and . analyzing. arguments are now in wide use in the field of argumentation studies, so far there is a paucity of resources for evaluating real arguments, aside from using . Journal #. Should schools replace books with tablets. ?. Brainstorm ideas supporting your assigned side. After a 3 minute deliberation, we’ll have a class debate.. What is Historical Argumentation?. C. onsider the Situation. What is the topic? . What . is my purpose? . Who . is my audience? . What . action do I want my audience to take? . C. larify your thinking . What . are you trying to prove? . Question: What do the following things have in common?. Answer. : All of them represent argumentation in contemporary society. . Everything’s an Argument. Unit 1, Lesson 1. TASK 1 – Arguments Are Everywhere. Oct. 29, 2015, University of Windsor Douglas Walton / . Fabrizio. . Macagno. CRRAR. . What Are Schemes?. Argumentation schemes are stereotypical patterns of reasoning (Walton 1990) . representing . as . Argument. Sharon Radcliff. Library Faculty CSU East Bay & . USF School of Education . Learning and Instruction Doctoral Program. Abstract:. The ability to understand more than one point of view, critique and create arguments is a widely accepted learning objective for any student engaged in a liberal arts education. As Gerald Graff states: “This . ANALYZING ARGUMENTS. Arguments can be analyzed, once recognized, by paraphrasing them or by . diagramming them. . . Paraphrasing . involves setting forth the argument in a clear and precise form. . Excercises. Chapter 4. A Strategy of Control. Chapter 4. What happens in a debate is the product of choices debaters make. Far too many debaters approach a debate round from a passive perspective, believing their responsibility is to merely track and respond to what happens in the round.. to Argumentation Mining in Natural Language Text. Topic 2. 4/14/2014. Huy V. Nguyen. 1. Outline. Introduction to argumentation. Argumentation mining the problem. Argumentation v. discourse. Annotation and corpora.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Chapter 2 Arguments and Argumentation"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents