PPT-Re-chartering BFD – IETF 78

Jeffrey Haas jhaaspfrcorg Dave Ward dwardjunipernet Where do we go from here We have largely accomplished our original charter Our original charter prohibited taking on new working group items without rechartering. 1. BEHAVE Working Group. IETF 77 – Anaheim. March, 2010. Chairs: . Dave Thaler, dthaler@microsoft.com. Dan Wing, dwing@cisco.com. BEHAVE – IETF 77. 2. Note Well. Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: . New Club Building & Revitalization Committee Webinar. Topics. The following topics will be discussed in this webinar:. Steps to club . c. hartering and reactivation. Communicating with CKI and district leadership about chartering and reactivation. Just Getting Started. NANOG 63. The . first ever IETF Help Desk was successfully held at . NANOG 63. in San Antonio . 2-4 February. . The help desk provided a common, known point for operators attending the NANOG meeting to bring their questions about the IETF. As expected, we received many very basic questions, the most popular being, ‘How do I get started?’. The booth was set up for all three days of the NANOG meeting and was staffed by experienced IETF volunteers most of the time, including during all breaks. Based on this success we will continue with our plan to facilitate hosting of the IETF Help Desk at NOG/NOF meetings around the world. BFD. Discriminator . TLV. for . MPLS. ping. (draft-. vgovindan. -. mpls. -extended-. bfd. -disc-. tlv. -00). IETF. -90 Toronto, ON. Vengada Prasad Govindan. Nobo Akiya. Problem statement. Usage of <. RFC. 5884. (. draft-. grmas. -. bfd. -. rfc5884. -clarifications-00. ). IETF. -91 Honolulu, HI. Vengada Prasad Govindan, . Kalyani. . Rajaraman. , . Gregory Mirsky,. Nobo Akiya . & . Sam Aldrin. for Bi-Directional . LSPs. for MPLS OAM. (particularly MPLS-TP OAM). George Swallow. cisco. MPLS-TP Assumptions. Bidirectional co-routed . LSPs. OAM carried in an associated channel. ITU standard for detection time is 10 ms. ?. Internet Standards and How to Get . Involved. Chris Grundemann. Internet Society. MENOG 15 – Dubai – 2 April 2015. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). First, one important point:. No one really speaks FOR the IETF.. Marc Linsner. 5/11/10. ECRIT Charter (or a piece of it). ………The . group will show how the availability of location data and . call routing . information at different steps in session setup would . 1. MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities. draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-01. MPLS WG, 76th IETF - Hiroshima, . Japan. 2. Authors. Annamaria Fulignoli (Ericsson). Sami Boutros (Cisco Systems ). server-model-01. NETCONF Server Configuration Model. Updates since . IETF 89. From . I-D. to -00. Changed title to "NETCONF Server Configuration . Model”. Mapped . inbound/outbound to listen/call-. Authors/Contributors/Contributions-by:. Many . BFDers. … (too many to list here). Thanks to those contributed!!. Presenter:. Nobo Akiya. IETF 90, Toronto, Canada. S-BFD Documents. Currently focused on:. draft-. wilton. -. netmod. -. intf. -. vlan. -yang. Robert Wilton (Cisco). Presentation Objectives. To explain what this IETF model is trying to achieve. To justify why this is being standardized in IETF. Ronald J. Gilson. Columbia Law School. Stanford Law School.  . Henry Hansmann. Yale Law School.  . Mariana Pargendler. Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School at São Paul. Corporate Chartering in a Federal System. Jeffrey Haas, . jhaas@pfrc.org. Dave Ward, . dward@juniper.net. . Long ago, in an IETF far, far away…. From. : Alex . Zinin. <. zinin. at psg.com. > . Date. : Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:38:42 -0800.