PPT-Re-chartering BFD – IETF 78

Jeffrey Haas jhaaspfrcorg Dave Ward dwardjunipernet Where do we go from here We have largely accomplished our original charter Our original charter prohibited taking on new working group items without rechartering. 1. BEHAVE Working Group. IETF 77 – Anaheim. March, 2010. Chairs: . Dave Thaler, dthaler@microsoft.com. Dan Wing, dwing@cisco.com. BEHAVE – IETF 77. 2. Note Well. Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: . Ronald J. Gilson. Columbia Law School. Stanford Law School.  . Henry Hansmann. Yale Law School.  . Mariana Pargendler. Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School at São Paul. Corporate Chartering in a Federal System. Jeffrey Haas, . jhaas@pfrc.org. Dave Ward, . dward@juniper.net. Where do we go from here. We have largely accomplished our original charter.. Our original charter prohibited taking on new working group items without re-chartering.. Just Getting Started. NANOG 63. The . first ever IETF Help Desk was successfully held at . NANOG 63. in San Antonio . 2-4 February. . The help desk provided a common, known point for operators attending the NANOG meeting to bring their questions about the IETF. As expected, we received many very basic questions, the most popular being, ‘How do I get started?’. The booth was set up for all three days of the NANOG meeting and was staffed by experienced IETF volunteers most of the time, including during all breaks. Based on this success we will continue with our plan to facilitate hosting of the IETF Help Desk at NOG/NOF meetings around the world. BFD. Discriminator . TLV. for . MPLS. ping. (draft-. vgovindan. -. mpls. -extended-. bfd. -disc-. tlv. -00). IETF. -90 Toronto, ON. Vengada Prasad Govindan. Nobo Akiya. Problem statement. Usage of <. draft-vkst-bfd-mpls-mib-01. . 1. MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities. draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-01. MPLS WG, 76th IETF - Hiroshima, . Japan. 2. Authors. Annamaria Fulignoli (Ericsson). Sami Boutros (Cisco Systems ). server-model-01. NETCONF Server Configuration Model. Updates since . IETF 89. From . I-D. to -00. Changed title to "NETCONF Server Configuration . Model”. Mapped . inbound/outbound to listen/call-. draft-. wilton. -. netmod. -. intf. -. vlan. -yang. Robert Wilton (Cisco). Presentation Objectives. To explain what this IETF model is trying to achieve. To justify why this is being standardized in IETF. Ronald J. Gilson. Columbia Law School. Stanford Law School.  . Henry Hansmann. Yale Law School.  . Mariana Pargendler. Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School at São Paul. Corporate Chartering in a Federal System. for Bi-Directional . LSPs. for MPLS OAM. (particularly MPLS-TP OAM). George Swallow. cisco. MPLS-TP Assumptions. Bidirectional co-routed . LSPs. OAM carried in an associated channel. ITU standard for detection time is 10 ms. Jeffrey Haas, . jhaas@pfrc.org. Dave Ward, . dward@juniper.net. . Long ago, in an IETF far, far away…. From. : Alex . Zinin. <. zinin. at psg.com. > . Date. : Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:38:42 -0800. background. This slide page is hidden from view in presentation mode. . . When printing, please make sure that the “print hidden slides” option is deselected.. The aim for this section is to provide a background to the IFS definition and the concept of “high seas”(. Jeffrey Haas, Juniper. jhaas@juniper.net. Albert Fu, Bloomberg. afu14@bloomberg.net. Problem Statement. In environments where applications running across multiple hops requires a consistent MTU, . blackholing.