/
Sociological Theories of Crime Causation Sociological Theories of Crime Causation

Sociological Theories of Crime Causation - PowerPoint Presentation

calandra-battersby
calandra-battersby . @calandra-battersby
Follow
484 views
Uploaded On 2016-11-03

Sociological Theories of Crime Causation - PPT Presentation

Professor Byrne Oct20 2015 Lecture Major Sociological Theories Strain Theories Cohen Cloward and Ohlin Merton Subcultural Theories Wolfgang and Ferracutti Miller Control Theories Hirschi and Gottfredson Reckless ID: 484140

class theory goals strain theory class strain goals theories individuals boys poverty programs middle means crime success criminal reject

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Sociological Theories of Crime Causation" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Sociological Theories of Crime Causation

Professor Byrne

Oct.20, 2015 LectureSlide2

Major Sociological Theories

Strain Theories

: Cohen, Cloward and Ohlin, Merton

Subcultural Theories

: Wolfgang and Ferracutti, Miller

Control Theories

: Hirschi and Gottfredson, Reckless,

Lifecourse Theory

:Sampson and LaubSlide3

Strain Theories : Merton, Cohen, Cloward and Ohlin, Agnew

Strain theories may focus on different aspects of criminal behavior (e.g. juvenile crime, gang formation, specific offender types) but

they share one common assumption: some (otherwise moral) people are driven to crime out of the frustration( and illegitimate opportunity structure) associated with living in lower class communities. Slide4

Robert Merton’s Goals vs. Means Typology of Individual Adaptations

Conformists

: Accept societal goals and means

Innovators

: Accept societal goals but reject means

Ritualists:

Reject societal goals but accept means

Retreatists

: Reject societal goals and means

Rebels

: Redefine both goals and meansSlide5

Cloward and Ohlin’s Theory of Differential Opportunity

Individuals may have blocked access to both legitimate and illegitimate opportunity structure, depending on neighborhood context.

Criminal Subculture

: in some neighborhoods, there is a stable, criminal organization that can be identified.

Conflict Subculture

: in other communities, there is no dominant criminal organization with several groups competing for control.

Retreatist Subculture

: individuals who can not gain entrance into either the criminal or conflict subculture tend to cluster here—these are double failures, who can not make it either legitimately or illegitimately.Slide6

Albert Cohen’s Theory of Delinquent Gangs

Key terms: prior socialization, labeling, middle class measuring rods, reaction formation, college boys, corner boys, delinquent boys, anti-utilitarian delinquency.

Theory: In school, kids from lower class areas are labeled as either bad or stupid.

There are three possible responses to this initial label: (1) try harder, (2) accept it, or (3) reject it and redefine success.Slide7

Cohen’s Typology

College Boys

: these juveniles continue to strive for educational success.

Corner Boys

: these juveniles lower their expectations and engage in marginal forms of deviance( alcohol, drugs).

Delinquent Boys

: these juveniles reject the negative labels and redefine status in a manner where they can be successful, through a process of reaction formation.

Today’s delinquent boys are tomorrow’s criminal offenders .Slide8

Modern Strain theory:

Robert Agnew

Revised versions of strain theory attempt to explain middle class delinquency.

Adolescents are more concerned with achievement of immediate goals, rather than the long term goals emphasized by classic strain theories: monetary success or job status.Slide9

Immediate Goals of Adolescents

Popularity with the opposite sex

Good Grades

Athletic Success

Owning a car

Getting along with parents

Achievement of immediate goals is independent of social classSlide10

Is Strain Theory Correct? A Review of the Evidence

Proposition 1:The universal emphasis on success is internalized by significant numbers of people in all social classes.

Several studies have found that the above proposition is not supported.

Lower class individuals have lower levels of aspirations than do middle class individuals:

They desire less education, less money, and less prestigious occupations than their middle class counterparts.

However, relative to what they have, lower class individuals desire as much, if not more, success than do middle class individuals.Slide11

A Review of the Evidence: Strain Theory

Proposition 2: Relative to middle class individuals, lower class individuals are less able to achieve their goals through legitimate channels

.

The Evidence here is mixedSlide12

A Review of the Evidence: Strain Theory

Proposition 3:

Strained

individuals are more likely to engage in crime.

The evidence here does not support the theorySlide13

A Critique of Strain Theory

The Class-crime connection is overstated.

Strain

should result in more crime; there is too much unexplained conformity in lower class areas.

Research testing strain theory relies on official data sources, rather than self-report or NCVS data.Slide14

Policy Implications of Strain Theory

War on Poverty: the development and expansion of anti-poverty programs in mid-60’s:

TANF: Temporary Assistance to Needy Families

From Food Stamps(1965) to SNAP(2008): Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

AFDC: Aid to Families with Dependent Children

TANF: Temporary Assistance to Needy Families

EITC: Earned income tax credit for low and medium income families enacted in 1975.

Medicaid

Other In-Kind Programs, such as ER( emergency assistance), and TRA( temporary rental assistance), Head Start and Upward Bound education programs

Social Insurance Programs: Social Security, Medicare, UI( unemployment insurance)Slide15

Effectiveness of Anti-Poverty Programs?

A new 

paper

 by economist Liana Fox and colleagues calculates historical poverty estimates using the U.S. Census Bureau’s new Supplemental Poverty Measure. That measure accounts for the impact of SNAP, the earned income tax credit, and other government programs on household incomes.

Using this supplemental measure, the authors suggest that poverty has declined from 19 percent to 16 percent over the past 50 years. And absent government antipoverty programs, while one-quarter of U.S. households would have been poor in 1967, fully 31 percent would have been poor today

.

https://screen.yahoo.com/war-poverty-didnt-fail-isnt-220240076.html

Slide16

Subcultural Theories

Wolfgang’s Subculture of Violence: Violence at home + Violence in community=situational use of violence by residents

Miller’s Theory of Lower Class : Focal Concerns of youth include:

Trouble, Toughness, Smartness, Autonomy, FateSlide17

Traditional Control Theories

Control Theory explains conformity

Hirshi’s 4 Bonds to Society: When these bonds are weak/broken, individuals are free to deviate

Attachment

Commitment

Involvement

BeliefSlide18

Lifecourse Theory

Four Key Turning Points in the Life course:

Marriage

Employment

Military

Relocation