PPT-Translation Equivalence and Synonymy:

Preserving the Synsets in Crosslingual Wordnets Olivia OY Kwong The Chinese University of Hong Kong oykwongartscuhkeduhk Infrastructure of Princeton WordNet Synsets as building blocks U. This appears to be a preprint version I take the term Translation Studies as an accepted and acceptable name for the general ruck of writings debates and research on aspects of translation European here means whatever is talked about in a disintegra The many different definitions of equivalence in translation fall broadly into. one of two . categories: they . are either . descriptive or prescriptive. . Descriptively. , 'equivalence. ' denotes the relationship between ST features and . Equivalence:. Descriptive. Prescriptive. Descriptive Equivalence . ST features . Corresponding to TT features:. ممنوع الدخول . ممنوع التدخين. ممنوع التصوير. في أمان الله . Historically, equivalence has represented one of the essential problems facing translation theory, since translation deals with two languages, each of which has its own characteristic features at the levels of phonetics, phonology, grammar, semantics, culture, . approach. linguistic approaches to the analysis of translation. Translation shifts =small linguistic changes occurring in translation of ST to TT.. Since the . 1950s . there has been a variety of linguistic approaches to . . developments. in . equivalence. The notion of . equivalence remained as . a key issue in translation . throughout the . 1970s and beyond. . For . instance, . Chesterman. . (. 1989) notes . that 'equivalence is obviously . Anthony Pym . Master of Translation . . Your questions: . Master of Translation . . Your questions: . Master of Translation . . Your questions on interdisciplinarity: . Master of Translation . How .  . Taylor . borrows. J.L. . Malone’s. list of . nine. . strategies. for . translating. . at. a . structural. or . lexicogrammatical. . level. :.  . 1/2. Equation . Substitution. approach. linguistic approaches to the analysis of translation. Translation shifts =small linguistic changes occurring in translation of ST to TT.. Since the . 1950s . there has been a variety of linguistic approaches to . effect. Based on . Eugene . Nida’s Theory. Introduction. In . Toward a Science of Translating . Eugene . Nida. discards using terms such as “literal”, “free” and “faithful” in . favor . Notable Opinions. . 1. . The . success of . equivalent . effect is . ‘. illusory’. 2. The . most crucial problem in . translation theory . and practice will always be:. ‘the conflict of loyalties’ and. Ryken. What Is a Good Translation?. Before 1950 – to translate the . words. of the Bible from the original Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic texts into a contemporary language. After 1950 – to translate the . the best known . taxonomy of translation shifts, devised by Vinay . and Darbelnet. E.g. Keep right = . az. . samt. . rast. . beranid. Catford: TRANSLATION SHIFTS. The small linguistic changes that occur between ST and TT are known as . equivalence. The notion of . equivalence remained as . a key issue in translation . throughout the . 1970s and beyond. . For . instance, . Chesterman. . (. 1989) notes . that 'equivalence is obviously .