PDF-IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIOState of Ohio Case No 101818vOqjGiNqlL Pe

MEMORANDUM OF SUPPORTThe FactsThis Honorable Supreme Court of Ohio does not have subject matter jurisdiction in this caseTherefore this court must dismiss the caseThe States alleged victims in this ca. S Constitutions Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures requires police to obtain a warrant to search a cell phone The decision generated considerable comment across the country as this was the 57375rst such ruling fro brPage 1br SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES brPage 2br brPage 3br SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES brPage 4br brPage 5br brPage 6br brPage 7br brPag brPage 1br SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES brPage 2br brPage 3br SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES brPage 4br brPage 5br brPage 6br brPage 7br brPage 1br SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES brPage 2br brPage 3br SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES brPage 4br brPage 5br brPage 6br brPage 7br brPage Unit 4: Institutions. The Supreme Court in Action…. To help you contextualize what the court does and how influential they are on our daily lives…. The Supreme Court Landmark Rulings. I. Background . Artwork. North. Reflecting. Pool. MALCOLM COCHRAN.  American, b. 1948.  . In Principle and In Practice.  . 2006.  . Granite.  . Funded by a grant from the . Ohio State Bar Foundation. South. Reflecting. “. Separate But Equal. ”. Power point created by Robert L. Martinez. Primary Content: . The Americans. In 1892, Homer . Plessy. took a seat in the “whites only” car of a train and refused to move. He was arrested, and convicted for breaking Louisiana’s segregation law.. The Function of the Supreme Court. Lesson . 1 Selecting Cases at the Supreme Court. The . Court’s . primary. function . is to resolve disputes that arise over the meaning of federal law and the US Constitution. . Why this Courtshould reconsider its decision:NO MERIT TO FORECLOSURE ACTIONS, PAST PRESENT ORBURDEN OF PROOF SHIFTS TO PRETENDERSDOCTRINE THAT A PLAINTIFF MUST ASSERT ITS OWNLEGAL RIGHTS AND MAY NOT A Explanation why thiscase isnot acaseof public or great general concernProcedural HistoryOn March 4, 2010, ten-year-old N.J. approached her guidance counselor ather younger sister on the morning of Mar TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS A CASE OF PUBLIC................................................................2ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITIONS OF LAW ....................... IN THE SUPREME COURT OFOHIOHABTAM GEBIPlaintiff-AppelleeCASE NO 2017-1791vOn Appeal from the Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals Tenth AppellateLEGESSE WORKUDistrictDefendant-AppellantAPPELLEES MEMORANDUM VIRGINIACity of Richmond on Thursdaythe3rdday of December2020 IN RE FOURTEENTH ORDER EXTENDING DECLARATION OF JUDICIAL EMERGENCY IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19 EMERGENCYUnder the constitutional statutory an Pro Se AppelleeMalgorzata Polkowska-Sulek9600 ZyrardowPro Se Appelleeul Kapitana Hali 6 m 9 PolandPro Se Appellee99-320 Zychlinul WarynskiegoPro Se Appellee96-300 ZyrardowPro Se AppelleeTABLE OF CONTE