2 Symbolic interactionism Symbolic interactionism is a microlevel theory based on the idea that people act in accordance with shared meanings orientations and assumptions Herbert Blumer ID: 718602
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Stigma: Management of a spoiled social i..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Stigma: Management of a spoiled social identitySlide2
2
Symbolic interactionism
Symbolic interactionism
is a
micro-level
theory based on the idea that people act in accordance with shared meanings, orientations, and assumptions
Herbert
Blumer
, a student of Mead, coined term
and put forward an influential summary of the perspective: people act toward things based on the meaning those things have for them; and these meanings are derived from social interaction and modified through interpretation.
Labeling theory
builds on symbolic
interactionist
principlesSlide3
3
Labeling theory
Labeling theory:
how public
labeling, or branding, as deviant, has adverse consequences for further social participation and self-image
most critical
change is in
public
identity, which is a crucial step towards building a long-term deviant
‘career’
If
‘master status’
is deviant, deviant identification becomes the controlling
one
master status:
a status that assumes priority, overrides other status
consideration
Labeling may be
a
‘self-fulfilling prophecy’
‘…
possession of one deviant trait may have a generalized symbolic value, so that people automatically assume that its bearer possesses other undesirable traits allegedly associated with
it’
– i.e., auxiliary
traits
Consequences:
exclusion
from participation in most
conventional groups
“treatments” (medication, institutionalization, incarceration, etc.) which
may
themselves
produce increasing devianceSlide4
"Stigma
is a process by which the reaction of others spoils normal
identity"
Greeks
originated the
term for
"bodily signs designed to expose something unusual and bad
about
the moral status of the
signifier”signs cut or burned into the body, advertising bearer was a slave, criminal, or a traitor - a blemished person, ritually polluted, to be avoided, esp in public places Today, term is applied more to disgrace itself, than to bodily evidence of it Shifts occur in the kinds of disgrace that arouse concern
4Slide5
5
Society has a way grouping people into social categories, each with a set of typical attributes
Whenever we meet someone new, we use our experience to anticipate his/her category & attributes, his/her
social identity
a person’s
virtual social identity
refers to the anticipated category and attributes
a person's actual social identity is their actual category and attributes Slide6
6
Stigma
Stigma
is a discrepancy between actual and
virtual social identity
that causes us to alter our estimation of them downward
Stigma
is an attribute that is deeply
discrediting
– but it depends on circumstancesan attribute that stigmatizes one person may be typical for another person and is therefore neither creditable nor discreditable in itselfe.g., some jobs cause employees w/o the expected college education to hide this fact; other jobs, however, can lead employees with a degree to keep it a secret, so that they aren't seen as outsiders
e.g., a middle class boy may have no problem being seen going to the library, whereas a gang member may worry about being seen by his associates
Stigma
is really a special kind of relationship between attribute and stereotype Slide7
How do stigmatized deal with
stigma
?
1) attempt
to correct
what he
sees as
objective
basis of failing
disfigured person gets plastic surgeryblind person gets eye treatmenthomosexual gets psychotherapy - in 1963 not transformation to someone ‘normal’ but someone with a record of having corrected a particular blemish
s
usceptibility to
victimization,
exploitation
by quacks
2) devote
private effort to mastering areas of activity felt to be closed
e
.g., wheelchair basketball3) use stigma as an explanation for all social failings4) see suffering as a ‘blessing in disguise’ (11)5) re-assess limitations of ‘normals’normal people, do they really see, hear.? (top 12)
7Slide8
Mixed contacts
Mixed contacts
: the
moments when
stigmatized individual (SI)
and
normal (N) are
in same "
social situation,"
in immediate physical presence, whether in conversation-like encounter or mere co-presence at unfocused gatheringAnticipation of uncomfortable scenario may lead N & SI to avoid themself-isolation (top 13)8Slide9
Mixed contacts
9
When they are forced to interact
you get ‘
primal scenes of sociology,’ cause & effect of stigma must be directly confronted by both sides
SI feels unsure of how Ns will react, ‘uncertainty of status’ (bot 13)
SI must be ‘on’ all the time, self-conscious and calculating about the impression s/he is making – the opposite of ‘sociability’ (
Simmel
)
SI may respond with ‘defensive cowering’ (17)SI may respond with ‘hostile bravado’ (17-18)Ns uncomfortable too, finding SI either too aggressive or too shamefaced, and always too ready to read unintended meanings into our actionsSlide10
The ‘pathology of interaction’
Mead neglects ‘pathological’ interaction and how we manage it
‘Each
potential source of discomfort for him when we are with him can become something we sense he is aware of, aware that we are aware of, and even aware of our state of awareness about his awareness; the stage is then set for the infinite regress of mutual consideration that
Meadian
social psychology tells us how to begin but not how to terminate
.’ (18)
‘infinite
regress of mutual consideration’‘In consequence, attention is furtively withdrawn from its obligatory targets, and self-consciousness and "other-consciousness" occurs, expressed in the pathology of interaction—uneasiness.’ (18)10Slide11
The ‘Own’
11
‘Own’: sympathetic
others who share stigma
Provide advice, moral support, acceptance
Downside is the focus is always on their ‘problem’
Some bases of collective life include:
self-help
clubs, residential
clubs, national associations (e.g., AA), informal networks, social service institutions (+ nearby establishments), residential communities (or ghettoes)Slide12
Public representation
12
Advocacy
groups for SI
create
publications
with success
stories,
atrocity tales, debates about collective goals & strategies, info about relevant equipment & treatmentsmay be in competition with others who don’t want to assimilateSome SIs become professional representativesOfficial representatives are not only ones who shape public image of stigmatized category media follows stories of spectacle, prize winning, first of his kindSIs in public eye transfer credit or
discredit/blame to all other members of stigmatized groupSlide13
The ‘Wise’
13
‘Wise’:
N
ormals
but
those whose
special situation has
made them privy to the secret life of SI & sympathetic with itgiven a measure of acceptance, a courtesy membership in clan1) people who work in establishments that cater to or control SIs, e.g., nurses, physical therapists, bartenders in gay bars, maids of prostitutes, the police, etc.2) people related through social structure to SI – treated by wider society as the
same, e.g.,
s
pouses, parents, children, other family, and friends
Experience ‘
courtesy stigma
’
Wise may treat SI as ‘normal’
A
‘cult of the stigmatized can occur’ – stigma-phobic response of the Normal countered by stigma-phile response of the WiseBy being quick to carry a burden that’s not ‘really’ theirs, may offend others, e.g.,White people putting on hoodies, claiming ‘I am Trayvon Martin’Slide14
Moral Career
14
Persons
with a
particular stigma tend to have similar
learning experiences regarding their plight, and similar changes in conception of self – a
similar
moral
career
that is both cause and effect of commitment to a similar sequence of personal adjustments a socialization processOne phase: SI learns and incorporates the standpoint of the Normal, acquiring the identity beliefs of the wider society and a general idea of what it would be like to possess a particular stigmaAnother phase: SI learns that he possesses a particular stigma and the consequences of possessing itT
iming
of two initial phases of moral career form important patterns,
establishing
a
foundation
for later
developmentSlide15
Four Patterns in Moral Career
15
Those with an inborn
stigma who
become
socialized into their
disadvantaged
situation even while they are learning and incorporating the standards
against which
they fall short (32)Those with an inborn stigma grow up in a ‘protective capsule’The point at which the protective capsule breaks varies by class, place of residence and type of stigma but it always gives rise to a moral experience
One
who
becomes stigmatized
later in life, or learns late in life that he has always been
discreditable
The former involves gradual adjustment, the latter, radical reorganization of life
Those
initially socialized in an alien community, who must then learn a second way of being that is felt by those around them to be the real and valid
oneUneasiness felt about new associates may give way to uneasiness concerning old onesSlide16
The turning point
16
F
ellow
sufferers more advanced in dealing
with stigma may welcome SI, sparking different emotions
u
neasiness
ambivalence
, ‘affiliation cycles’oscilations in beliefSI often discovers members of the group are like ordinary human beings (39)Slide17
17
The discredited and the discreditable
When one possesses a stigma that is ‘known about,’ s/he is
discredited
i.e., when SI’s failing can be perceived by merely directing attention (typically visual) to him/her
e
.g., physical deformity or disability
Focus turns to managing tension in interactions with
normalsIf the stigma is not known about, s/he is discreditable e.g., mental illness, medical/criminal history Focus turns to managing undisclosed information about a supposed
failing -
passingSlide18
Passing
18
'Passing' is when people with a stigma that is not known about (the discreditable) 'pass'
for '
normals
'
The discreditable may attempt to conceal their stigmatizing attributes in a conscious strategy
to passSlide19
Symbols – of prestige & stigma
19
S
ymbols
are signs that convey social information
prestige symbol
(aka, status symbol) coveys social information about an individual indicating prestige, honor, or desirable class position
stigma symbol
are signs drawing attention to a debasing identity discrepancy, which reduce society’s valuation of the individualSlide20
20
D
isidentifier
A third type of sign is a
disidentifier
disidentifiers
are signs intended to break up an otherwise coherent picture, but in a positive direction desired by the actor
actor attempts to undermine social stereotypes about him/her by displaying some symbol
(
disidentifier) that doesn’t fit with the stereotype, e.g., a homeless person reads a newspaper or book in an attempt to stay the night in some public spaceputting on glasses in an attempt to look more “intellectual” putting on “religious” attire in an attempt to feign belief
taking off “religious” attire in an attempt to disguise beliefSlide21
21
As described by A.
Marvasti
, in post-9/11 NYC, US flags were deployed as
disidentifiers
among people suspected of disloyalty, to
pass
as loyal Americans
(“Being Middle Eastern American: Identity Negotiation in the Context of the War on Terror,” 2005)Slide22
The Self and its Other (Ch. IV)
Some may think that established
minority
groups (e.g., blacks, Jews) should
be
the object of analysis, but the key
issue is their place in the
social
structure,
which requires analysis of the history, politics, and current policies of the groupcontingencies encountered in F2F interaction is only part of the problem‘The most fortunate of normals is likely to have a half-hidden failing, and for every little failing there is a social occasion when it will loom large, creating a shameful gap between virtual and actual social identity. Therefore, the occasionally precarious and constantly precarious form a single continuum, their situation analyzable by the same framework.’ (127)We should look
to the
ordinary
for an understanding of
differentness
‘The
question of
social
norms is certainly central, but the concern might be less for uncommon deviations from the ordinary than for ordinary deviations from the
common.’ (127)22Slide23
Stigma vs. Deviance
23
Deviance
is not complying with
norms
Stigma
involves violation of norms of special kind, norms concerning
identity
or
being ‘It is a question of the individual's condition, not his will; it is a question of conformance, not compliance.’ (128)Slide24
Some norms take form of ideals and constitute standards against which almost everyone falls short at some stage
in life…
24
‘For example, in
an important sense there is only one complete unblushing male in America: a young, married, white, urban, northern, heterosexual Protestant father of college education, fully employed, of good complexion, weight, and height, and a recent record in sports. Every American male tends to look out upon the world from this perspective, this constituting one sense in which one can speak of a common value system in America. Any male who fails to qualify in any of these ways is likely to view himself--during moments at least--as unworthy, incomplete, and inferior; at times he is likely to pass and at times he is likely to find himself being apologetic or aggressive concerning known-about aspects of himself he knows are probably seen as undesirable.
The general
identity-values
of a society may be fully entrenched nowhere, and yet they can cast some kind of shadow on the encounters encountered everywhere in daily living
.
’ (128)Slide25
Culture,
subcultures
Culture
: shared understandings and their representations in symbols or practices (Tilly, 2005)
Subculture
:
a
cultural group within a larger culture
with shared understandings and practices at variance with those of the larger culturea subculture is a subdivision of a national cultureSociology Factsheet on ‘Youth Subcultures,’ in the UK highlights ‘goths,’ ‘emos,’ and ‘chavs’Styles draw on American culture, but meanings are somewhat different in UK
25Slide26
Chav,
per
Sociology Factsheet on ‘Youth Subcultures,’
Curriculum
Press, UK
“This
refers to a subculture which
originated from
within the working class culture of England. Chav fashion is derived from American hip hop (African American) and Guido (Italian-American) fashions and stereotypes such as gold jewelry and designer clothing combined with elements of working class British street fashion. The defining features of the chav clothing is the Burberry pattern (notably a now discontinued
baseball
cap) and from a
variety of
other casual and sportswear brands. Tracksuits, hoodies
and baseball
caps are particularly associated with this stereotype.
Lauren Cooper
who is played by Catherine Tate in the Catherine Tate show, is a stereotype of a chav female. They aspire to the latest mobile phone and other accessories. They tend to have a dislike of goths and emos as well as other ‘alternative’ subcultures.”
26Slide27
What’s the ‘chav
-bashing’ all about?
27
I
n
Chavs
: The Demonization of the Working Class
,
Owen Jones argues:
‘The word “chav” has become a way to stereotype a vast underprivileged section of our society. It’s a term that has become synonymous with the white working class, a way of rationalizing inequality. After all, if the working class is full of spendthrift layabouts who lack aspiration, then social programs aimed at poverty reduction become a waste of time and money.’Just the latest object of middle-class derision & moral superiority?
Does contempt reveal
more about
the detractors? Status anxiety?
Is this racism?
t
argets are generally white, but ‘whites [who’ve] become black,’ as British historian David Starkey put it in response to the UK riots
How do racial/class politics in UK compare to US?