/
COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG) COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG)

COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG) - PowerPoint Presentation

cheryl-pisano
cheryl-pisano . @cheryl-pisano
Follow
417 views
Uploaded On 2016-12-18

COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG) - PPT Presentation

April 2015 Update to COPS Registered DG Threshold Background Unregistered Distributed Generation DG are electrical generating facilities located at a Customers point of delivery connected at a distribution voltage and equal to or less than the ID: 503029

registration threshold ercot load threshold registration load ercot zone phase market settlement cswg communication change notice discussion operations price reduced registered settlements

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING G..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG)

April 2015 Update to COPSSlide2

Registered DG Threshold Background

Unregistered Distributed Generation (DG) are electrical generating facilities located at a Customer’s point of delivery, connected at a distribution voltage, and equal to or less than the

DG

registration

threshold (Currently set at 1 MW).

TAC Leadership requested that COPS develop

an

Change Communication Plan,

in case the DG registration threshold is ever reduced below the current 1

MW

Items to be considered before reducing the DG Registration

Threshold are

(1) Settlements (Wholesale generation settlements vs. load aggregation process for settlements, AMS vs. TDSP monthly reported metering, LMP vs. Load Zone pricing) and (2) Operations (what

registered DG

is and is not included in the Network Operations Model

)

In order to communicate a new DG registration requirement to ERCOT Stakeholders and specifically DG Owners, ERCOT, TAC Subcommittees and TDSPs (and possibly REPs) will need to be part of the communication

plan

How to document the

DG Registration Threshold Change

Communication Plan and where to keep the documentation for

future reference and

useSlide3

Registered DG Threshold

Two Discussion Items

Development of a Change Communication Plan

and where

to keep

it for future reference

(COPSMG: Section 5, Market Notice Communication Process, or Appendix)

Whether to change the

10 MW in any Load Zone threshold

trigger

; For example to 20 MW in any Load Zone (Requires a NPRR)

(Protocol Section 16.5 requires ERCOT to reduce the DG Registration Threshold once any Load Zone reaches an aggregated 10 MW, to an amount such that no Load Zone exceeds an aggregated 7 MW; Currently estimated to be at about 300 kW and impacting 10 to 12 DG facilities)Slide4

CSWG DG Registration Threshold Discussion Highlights

No current reliability or settlement issues

Settlement (Unregistered)

Competitive area:

Outflows are treated as negative load for the Rep

In NOIE:

Outflows reduce load at the NOIE boundary metering points

Operations

ERCOT evaluates

whether to include

registered DG in

the Network Operations

Model on a case-by-case basis

Non-modeled generation is not

currently

a problem in terms of resource adequacy planningSlide5

CSWG DG Registration Threshold Discussion Highlights

How to determine a new threshold

trigger

2014_QTR4 report shows 87 sites with an aggregated capacity of ~16MW

LZ_North is over 7MW; Once any Load Zone reaches 10 MW a 9-month notice to the market of a registration threshold reduction is triggered

Raise the DG registration threshold trigger from 10MW to 20MW per load zone

The

10 MW trigger

will cause the registration

of 10-12 sites >300kW

Find an operations network modeled-based criteria for establishing a DG registration threshold; How many MWs from a single DG is enough to be included in the model?

This discussion will continue at CSWGSlide6

Draft DG Registration Threshold Change Communication Plan

Trigger: When Reported Unregistered DG, > 50 kW and <= 1 MW, in

any one Load Zone reaches an aggregated 10 MW

ERCOT Staff - Post the new (reduced) DG Registration Requirement on the Market Information System (MIS)

ERCOT Staff - Meet with the appropriate TAC Subcommittees to announce the new (reduced) DG Registration Threshold

ERCOT

Staff - Issue

a Market Notice

announcing the new (reduced)

DG Registration Threshold

with an implementation date of 9

months after

date of the Market Notice

Appropriate TDSP/NOIE - Notify individual DG Owners and their REPs that are immediately impacted by the new DG Registration Threshold

Notice/Notification content details to be determined at the CSWGSlide7

Scope Change to 2015 Market System Enhancements

2015 Market System Enhancements

Timing

Phase 1

NPRR626

– Reliability Deployment Price Adder

NPRR665

– As-Built Clarification of Reliability Deployment Price Adder

NPRR568 Phase 2

– Real-Time Reserve Price Adder Based on ORDC

NPRR644

– Operating Reserve Demand Curve Phase 2 Revisions

NPRR645

– Real-Time On-Line Capacity Revisions

NPRR598 – Clarify Inputs to PRC and ORDCOBD – Methodology for Setting Max Shadow PricesPhase 2NPRR595 – RRS Load Resource Treatment In ORDCNPRR568 Phase 2 – Real-Time Reserve Price Adder Based on ORDCNPRR644 – Operating Reserve Demand Curve Phase 2 RevisionsPh1 – 6/27-6/28Ph2 – 9/21-9/25

At the 3/4/2014 WMS meeting, ERCOT recommended the removal of NPRR568 Phase 2 from the June delivery WMS concurred with ERCOT’s recommendation and asked that MPs consider whether they would support:The deferral of NPRR568 Phase 2 to the 2nd phase of the in-flight project; or,The removal of NPRR568 Phase 2 altogether (NPRR required to strike the gray box)Follow-up discussion planned at April WMS meeting

Slide found in March PRS BusInt UpdateSlide8

Changes to the document formerly known as the

“Nodal Settlement Operating Guide”

Nodal Settlement Handbook

Why?

Maintained by CSWG, not ERCOT (though ERCOT is encouraged to review)

Non-binding, collaborative work-in-progress

Flexibility to incorporate Protocol grey-boxes and work ahead, or wait for efficient time to add

Broaden scope to include shadow techniques for charge types not in the ERCOT matrix, e.g. ERS

Further broaden to include Settlement-related workflows, not on Settlement statements, e.g. ERO Fee