/
Ocean  Carriers Ocean  Carriers

Ocean Carriers - PowerPoint Presentation

conchita-marotz
conchita-marotz . @conchita-marotz
Follow
392 views
Uploaded On 2015-10-01

Ocean Carriers - PPT Presentation

presented by Franko Kulaga Guergana Anguelova Moritz Broelz Agenda Introduction Project Factors Methodology Results Sensitivity Analysis Recommendations Discussion Introduction Ocean Carriers owns and operates Capesize vessels that carry iron ore worldwide ID: 146552

carriers recommendations 475 ocean recommendations carriers ocean 475 npv 212 charter ore iron year growth tax firm capesize decision

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Ocean Carriers" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Ocean Carriers

presented byFranko KulagaGuergana AnguelovaMoritz BroelzSlide2

Agenda

IntroductionProject FactorsMethodologyResultsSensitivity AnalysisRecommendationsDiscussionSlide3

Introduction

Ocean Carriers owns and operates Capesize vessels that carry iron ore worldwide.Round cape horn– longer and riskier routes.Mainly chartered for 1-, 3-, or 5-year periods, occasional spot market charter.Slide4

January 2001: proposed lease of a ship for 3 years beginning in early 2003Daily charter rate: $20,000 per day, with annual escalation of $200 per dayNo ship in fleet meets the requirements Commission a new capsize carrier?

Option 1: Ocean carriers is US firm (35% tax)Option 2: Ocean carriers is HK firm (0% tax)Project factorscustomers’ proposalSlide5

Methodology

Yearly Operating Costs‘ Growth = 1% + Inflation (3%) ∆ Net working Capital = Inflation1.

2.

Calculate net

cashflows

for every year

Slide6

Results

1. Actual cost of the new capsize vessel:Capesize is bought in 3 installments discounted at 9% = $33,738,397.44 IRR = NPV of 0 = Break-even WACC

2.Slide7

NPV At Different Deviations From Base

Deviation from Base CaseOperating Cost Growth RateAvg. Daily Charter Growth Rate

Numbers of days operating

WACC

-30%

$ 2,955,603

$ (713,769)

$ (14,475,679)

$ 9,603,476

-15%

$ 2,118,038

$ 235,847

$ (6,631,602)

$ 4,964,848

0

$ 1,212,475

$ 1,212,475

$ 1,212,475

$ 1,212,475

15%

$ 232,610

$ 2,216,939

N/A

$ (1,844,225)

30% $ (828,474) $ 3,250,087 N/A $ (4,349,700)Range $ 3,784,076 $ 3,963,856 $ 15,688,155 $ 13,953,176

Sensitivity Analysis

This is the

best case

scenario (25 year – no tax)! What if an important variable changes to an adverse condition?Slide8

Recommendations

Verify Consultant Firm Projections!Slide9

Recommendations

Caution:Worldwide capesize fleet relatively newIn market downturn -> excess capacity (supply)!What would happen to spot-charter rates?Slide10

Recommendations

Practical implications possibly influencing decision:Seek less expensive financing (BEP = IRR)Gaining a new customer:Who?How much business in the future?What about Iron Ore markets apart from Australia & India?

Country

Production

China

820 (2009

Australia

470 (2009)

Brazil

250

India

150

Russia

105

Ukraine

73

United States

54

South Africa

40

Iran

35

Canada

33

Sweden24Venezuela20Kazakhstan15Mauritania11Other countries43

Total world

1690

Estimated iron ore production in million metric tons for 2006 according to U.S. Geological Survey

- wikipedia.orgSlide11

Recommendations

Importance of NPV?Economic profits (NPV) are “excess” returnsAll projects earn zero “excess” returns in a long-term competitive equilibriumDoes Ocean Carriers differ from the theoretical “long run competitive equilibrium”?  25 Years!Positive NPV illusionary!?

Can this decision be made with the provided information?Slide12

Discussion

Any questions