PPT-Use QM CPE Rubric to Guide the Design of a

MOOC Developmental Course Yaping Gao EDD District Director Instructional Design Headquarters in Ft Lauderdale FL Multiple campuses amp county centers Various international affiliates 68000 students annually 28000 FTE. The corrected rubric can be accessed on the ELPA webpage wwwmichigangovelpa or at httpwwwmichigangovdocuments mdeWRITINGSPEAKINGRUBRICS3650307pdf 5743157445 574415745657455574525745557447574495746657445 574465745557458 574415745457465 5744357455574 Elisa Palmer. edTPA. Coordinator, Illinois State University. December 2014. “Understanding the Rubric Level Progressions” Guides. Detail what each level of each rubric means. Can be shared with any individuals involved in . KY Writing Project Conference. September . 12, 2015. 1. carol.franks@education.ky.gov. rebecca.woosley@education.ky.gov. TARGETS. I can evaluate rubrics for quality.. I can identify when a rubric is congruent to expectations of grade level standards.. How to:. design a rubric that does its job. write precise criteria and descriptors. make your rubric student-friendly . Expert Input. . Experts agree:. Rubrics are hard to design.. Rubrics are time-consuming to design.. Presented by the ORIE Team. How to Create a Rubric. Participants’ Learning Outcomes. At the end of this training section, participants will be able to do the following: . D. etermine . which . types . KY Writing Project Conference. September 2015. 1. carol.franks@education.ky.gov. rebecca.woosley@education.ky.gov. Sit with your grade level. . Our Targets. I . can design a quality rubric congruent to expectations of grade level standards. Double check with rubric.. Scoring Directions. Look closely at Deadlines!. Scored by CRA. Observation. , Justification/Background Research, Research Question, Hypotheses, Variables, Procedures, & References will be scored by . English . Language . Specialist . www.robdanin.com. . What is a Rubric?. An “authentic” method of assessing the learner. Provides a . transparent . assessment process. A guideline for rating student performance (Asmus, 1999).. Dimensions 1, 2 and 7. 1. Problem Clarification . Clearly articulates the problem after a thorough exploration of multiple solution paths. Fully considers the needs of the client and the perspectives of other stakeholders during problem clarification. . Graded Assignments for All. Not everyone thinks alike. Disabilities. Learning styles. Cultural emphases. Historical social inequalities. Inclusive Excellence = paradigm shift. From different = problem . Crosswalk. December 2016 version compared with October 2018 version.. CVC-OEI Course Design Rubric. We are excited to roll out the October 2018 version of the CVC-OEI Course Design Rubric to all of you. . Jeni. Corn, . jocorn@ncsu.edu. . Malinda Faber, . mmfaber@ncsu.edu. . Friday Institute, NC State University . . Rubric available from . http. ://ncdlplan.fi.ncsu.edu/resources. /. . NC Digital Learning Plan . KeyStone. Training. Agenda. Marketplace Challenges and . KeyStone. . Solutions. KeyStone. . SoC. Hardware Design. Software Development. Common Usage Cases. Network gateway, speech/voice processing. Required ElementsEXCELLENT 4GOOD 3-2FAIR 1POOR 0Posting thoroughly answers the discussion prompts and demonstrates understanding of material with welldeveloped ideas Posting integrates assigned conten