/
A randomized controlled trial to compare A randomized controlled trial to compare

A randomized controlled trial to compare - PowerPoint Presentation

contessi
contessi . @contessi
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-11-06

A randomized controlled trial to compare - PPT Presentation

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation in patients difficult to wean from mechanical ventilation Running title NAVA may reduce weaning duration from mechanical ventilation ID: 816214

nava days day ventilation days nava ventilation day ventilator weaning patients psv free mechanical stay duration icu length hospital

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "A randomized controlled trial to compare" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

A randomized controlled trial to compare Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation in patients difficult to wean from mechanical ventilation

Running title: NAVA may reduce weaning duration from mechanical ventilation

Ling Liu1, Xiaoting Xu1, Qin Sun1, Yue Yu1, Feiping Xia1, Jianfeng Xie1, Yi Yang1, Leo Heunks2*, Haibo Qiu1*

Department of Critical Care Medicine,

Zhongda

Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China

2

Amsterdam UMC, location

VUmc

, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

*

Joint corresponding authors

Slide2

Prospective Randomized controlled trialOne general ICU, From October 2011 to September 2017Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01280773)The protocol was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee of Zhongda hospital (Approval Number: 2010ZDLL018.0)

Study designs

PatientPatients receiving acute invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24h were eligible when meeting all the following criteriaFailing the initial spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) or re-intubated within 48 h after the first extubationable to sustain PSV more than 1h with inspiratory support ≤ 15 cmH2O, hemodynamic stable (heart rate < 140 beats/min, no vasopressors required or ≤ 5 μg.kg-1.min-1 dopamine/ dobutamine, or ≤ 0.2 μg.kg-1.min-1 norepinephrine), Maintain light sedation (RASS ≥ -2) during day time

Slide3

Ventilation strategies

PSVsupport level was set to obtain a Vt of 6–8 ml/kg. PBW

flow-trigger- 1 L/mincycle off -30 % NAVA NAVA level was titrated to obtain a Vt of 6–8 ml/kg. PBWEAdi trigger-0.5 μVcycles off -70 % of peak EAdiFiO2 and PEEP were set by the physician in charge to maintain the SpO2 ≥ 90% We reasoned that a ventilator mode that improves patient ventilator interaction and delivers proportional support most likely improves weaning outcome in patients difficult to wean from mechanical ventilation.Hypothesis

Slide4

Weaning protocolMaterials and methods

Daily screen at 9:00 AM

A 30-minute SBT Patients were screened once daily for possible SBT from the first day after randomization (day 1)CPAP of 5 cm H2O or PSV with inspiratory pressure of 7 cmH2O and 5 cmH2O of PEEPFailedSuccessRestore to ventilation settings before SBTAdequate cough

Reconnected and ventilated in either NAVA or

PSV mode

Yes

Extubation

No

Decisions related to tracheostomy, post-extubation NIV and reintubation were made by clinical team.

Slide5

Primary outcome

The percentage of patients who were never weaned from mechanical ventilation was 17% (8/47) in NAVA group and 33% (17/52) in PSV group

(P = 0.073) PSV (n=52)NAVA (n=47)PPrimary outcome   Duration of weaning in weaned patient a, days4.1(1.1-7.7)2.4 (1.1-5.3)

0.041

Duration of weaning

in all patients

b

, days

7.4 (2.0-26.5)

3.0 (1.2-7.9)

0.003

Slide6

Conclusions

 

PSV (n=52)NAVA (n=47)Pother outcomes   Invasive ventilator-free days, day 2821 (0-26)25 (20-27)0.034Ventilator-free days, day 70 (0-5.0)

4.0 (0-5.8)

0.061

Ventilator-free days, day 14

6.6 (0-12.0)

11.0 (6.0-12.8)

0.011

Ventilator-free days, day 28

21.0 (0-26.0)

25.0 (20.0-27.0)

0.041

Length of stay in ICU, days

27 (13-40)

19(12-32)

0.330

Length of stay in ICU in survivors, days

19 (10-33)

24 (12-35)

0.326

Length of stay in hospital, days

32 (19-58)

29 (19-44)

0.491

Length of stay in hospital in survivors, days

30 (17-44)

35 (26-47)

0.424

ICU mortality, n (%)

17 (32.7)

8 (17.0)

0.073

28 day mortality, n (%)

14 (26.9)

14 (29.8)

0.752Hospital mortality, n (%)25 (48.1)16 (34.0)0.157

In patients who were difficult to wean, NAVA decreased duration of weaning and increase ventilator-free days. NAVA which improved patient-ventilator asynchrony, is safe, feasible and effective during weaning.

Secondary outcomes