meraldSPV00612indd 89132009 84319 AMWhen it is the speakers view that is represented in S1 as in 8eg S1 must be explicitly nal positionthe suspect aspect which is a very different pattern from ID: 896079
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "4a A Jack is in Boston today B he is i..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1 (4)(a) A: Jack is in Boston today. B: ,
(4)(a) A: Jack is in Boston today. B: , he is in New York. (b) A: He hasnt arrived. B: (c) A: Pete disagreed with us. B: (d) A: Did you say that Mary made a trivial mistake? B: she made a horrendous error. (e) A: Let him go. B: The expressions Thats wrong, You are mistaken, or the like may be substituted for However, these expressions cant co-occur with (5)(a) A: Hes arrived. B:
2 Thats not true/On the contrary, he won
Thats not true/On the contrary, he wont be here for an hour. (b) A: Hes arrived. B: Thats not true. On the contrary, he wont be here for an hour.(6) A: Didnt you say that George had done it? (I didnt say that). I said he couldnt have done it, given his skills., I said he couldnt have done it, given his skills.(I didnt say that). On the contrary, I said he couldnt have done it, give
3 n his merald_SP-V006_12.indd 89 /13/2
n his merald_SP-V006_12.indd 89 /13/2009 8:43:19 AM When it is the speakers view that is represented in S1, as in (8e g), S1 must be explicitly nal position.the suspect aspect, which is a very different pattern from a propositionally negated sentence with the same words. The sequences in (11) are illustrative.(11)(a) The glass isnt half full, (), its half empty. (b) Hes not my father,
4 (), Im his daughter. (c) A: Are you ha
(), Im his daughter. (c) A: Are you happy? B: Im not happy, (In (11a b), the speaker is proposing a different orientation to what has been suggested, even though the corrected version is logically synonymous with the rejected segment, while in (11c) is rejected because it doesnt capture the magnitude of the true feeling of the speaker. LTERNATIVE is . However, examination of the exam- t,
5 or ts awkwardly, in their contexts. In
or ts awkwardly, in their contexts. In fact, in searching the BNC, for example, only a few cases were found. The following examples ect the use of (12)(a) The fact that Mr. Bush believes he is right does not mean that events will prove him To the contrary (b) The Washington Post said that the knock against Clinton is that he is shifty. To the A second use of (13)(a) Despite frequently heard
6 voices (b) If there is evidence (c) N
voices (b) If there is evidence (c) Nothing in these papers makes me believe anything merald_SP-V006_12.indd 91 /13/2009 8:43:19 AM (17)(a) John is fairly good looking. , Henry is fairly ugly. (b) We started out late. in (16) conveys a measure of surprise or annoyance not is used. The uses of and are Interestingly, if the sequences in (16) have the expression Youre mistaken or an
7 analogous (18)(a) A: Harry is not tall
analogous (18)(a) A: Harry is not tall. B: But youre mistaken/On the contrary (b) A: Sue did not agree with me. B: thats wrong/On the contrary is not typically present. The co-occurrence of the two CDMs in a (19)(a) A: Jack is in Boston today. B: , he is in New York. (b) A: B: in an context occurs when there is one speaker, both seg- ects the speakers opinion, and the use is not in
8 tended as a case of metalinguistic negat
tended as a case of metalinguistic negation. This is illustrated in (20). (20)(a) There was no reliable evidence of guilt. (b) He did not attempt to enter into ruinous competition. What is different in this one-speaker case is that the sequence and on the contrary may co-occur, which was not the case for the two-speaker examples. Analogous sequences occur with (21) It was argued for the defe
9 ndant in the present appeal that his cas
ndant in the present appeal that his case was wrongly decided. nd myself in full agreement with the award. y how the CDMs differ from each other and to stress that signals that the speaker merald_SP-V006_12.indd 93 /13/2009 8:43:19 AM interesting and complicated DMs are. Their examination has just begun.Fraser, B. (2006). Towards a theory of discourse markers, in K. Fischer (ed.), Appr
10 oaches to discourse . Amsterdam: Elsevie
oaches to discourse . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 189 204.Fraser, B. (2008). . Boston University.A natural history of negation merald_SP-V006_12.indd 95 /13/2009 8:43:19 AM 12AQ1 merald_SP-V006_12.indd 87 /13/2009 8:43:18 AM Our reference:SP_V006 12 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Book : SP_V006 E-mail: Chapter : 12 In case artwork needs revision, please consult http://authors.elsevier.com/
11 artwork Page 2 of 2 Queries and / or rem
artwork Page 2 of 2 Queries and / or remarks in Article Query / remark Response and incomplete presentation of one CDM"? Please Please confirm the change of "Fraser (ms)" to "Fraser please update this reference w Thank you for your assistance Please confirm the placement of "However Please check the end dot appesegments ...". Please confirm the changes in punctuation in (6). Please confirm
12 the changes in punctuation in (11). Sca
the changes in punctuation in (11). Scanning the artwork : This section comprises references that occur in the reference list Please position each reference inreference not dealt with will be retained in this section. Queries and / or remarks in Article Query / remark Response In case artwork needs revision, please consult http://authors.elsevier.com/artwork Page 1 of 2 manuscript for types