PPT-A Rubric Approach

to History Research Meggan Houlihan School of Libraries and Learning Technologies Mate Nikola Tokić Department of History 10 th Annual AMICAL Conference John Cabot University Rome. EVALUATION TEAMS. 1 Adult Evaluator. 2 Student Evaluators. . +. 1 Student Room Consultant. 1 Student Timer. 1 Student Clerk. 1 Monitor (only when specified). Duties. Evaluators. use rubric to rate individual or teams in their event. Nargundkar. Based on Instructional Innovation Grant, Summer 2014.. Robinson College of Business. Georgia State . University. January 22, 2015. Critical Thinking in Decision Analysis. Critical Thinking. and. Qualitative Assessment of Critical Thinking Skills in the Humanities. Critical Thinking: SPC’s Definition. CRITICAL THINKING is the active and systematic process of Communication, Problem-solving, Evaluation, Analysis, Synthesis, and Reflection both individually and in community to foster understanding, and support sound decision-making.. Elisa Palmer. edTPA. Coordinator, Illinois State University. December 2014. “Understanding the Rubric Level Progressions” Guides. Detail what each level of each rubric means. Can be shared with any individuals involved in . . Timothy S. Brophy, Professor and Director, Institutional Assessment. Office of the Provost. Goals:. Introduce . the basic design principles for creating rubrics. Introduces rubric types. Present . KY Writing Project Conference. September . 12, 2015. 1. carol.franks@education.ky.gov. rebecca.woosley@education.ky.gov. TARGETS. I can evaluate rubrics for quality.. I can identify when a rubric is congruent to expectations of grade level standards.. Professional Development Conference 2011. bjaucoin@staff.nstu.ca. Travel Fellowship. A fund of . $3000. , sponsored by Johnson Inc. To provide teachers, faculty and professional support staff with the opportunity to undertake programs of travel during the summer or . How to:. design a rubric that does its job. write precise criteria and descriptors. make your rubric student-friendly . Expert Input. . Experts agree:. Rubrics are hard to design.. Rubrics are time-consuming to design.. An . Intersegmental. Learning Project for Approaching . a Common Understanding of College . Readiness in San Diego, CA. Mark Manasse, San Diego Miramar College. Glen . McClish. , San Diego State University. Presented by the ORIE Team. How to Create a Rubric. Participants’ Learning Outcomes. At the end of this training section, participants will be able to do the following: . D. etermine . which . types . Auburn University. Ashlee Mills Duffy, Educational Psychology and Office of University Writing. Bonnie Sanderson, School of Nursing. Jamie Sailors, Human Development and Family . Studies. Leslie . Cordie. Assessment & Support System. CEEDAR State Convening. Partners. Who is Involved? . edTPA. Map. Alabama Policy. State Policy: Alabama. Policy Overview: . The Alabama Department of Education has set a goal to implement a . Why use rubrics?. Characteristics of good rubrics. Definition & types of rubric. Strategies for rubric development. SOLO taxonomy. Phenomeno. -. graphic sorting. Using rubrics with students. Definition. Required ElementsEXCELLENT 4GOOD 3-2FAIR 1POOR 0Posting thoroughly answers the discussion prompts and demonstrates understanding of material with welldeveloped ideas Posting integrates assigned conten