2017 Agile Governance Survey Results Scott W Ambler wwwscottamblercom scottwambler Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler Associates How To Use These Slides We have provided these slides and the raw data behind them so that others can use them in their own work ID: 547881
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates
2017 Agile GovernanceSurvey Results
Scott W. Amblerwww.scottambler.com@scottwambler Slide2
Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates
How To Use These SlidesWe have provided these slides, and the raw data behind them, so that others can use them in their own work.
You may reuse all, or a part of, this slide deck as long as you provide a clear reference to the source.The suggested reference is: 2017 Agile Governance Survey Results posted at Ambysoft.com/surveys/agileGovernance2017.html
Some slides
have notesSlide3
Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates
About the Survey
Ran from January 31, 2017 to February 19 2017 under the title “February 2017 Agile Mini-Survey”Survey link included in:
www.ambysoft.com/surveys/
page
Posting
to
Agile and Lean; Disciplined Agile discussion groups
on LinkedInTwitter postings via @scottwamblerData, summary, and slides downloadable from www.ambysoft.com/surveys/180 respondents Many questions included an “I don’t know” or N/A option. When processing the data from those questions, we have excluded those answers from the analysis.Slide4
Interesting Findings from the 2017 Agile Governance Survey
78% of respondents reported that their agile teams were being governed in some mannerBut only half of those said their agile teams were governed in a lightweight or agile manner
Agile teams must be governed in an agile mannerTraditional approaches to governing agile teams backfire, producing negative resultsAgile approached to governing agile teams produce positive resultsDeliverables for traditional governance strategies can be easily faked by agile
teams (and by traditional teams too)
without the risk of being caught
Deliverables for agile governance strategies are difficult to fake in practice
Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + AssociatesSlide5
Does Your Organization Have a Governance Strategy in Place?
Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates
Source: 2017 Agile Governance SurveySlide6
How would you best describe your organization's approach to governing your agile team?
Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates
Source: 2017 Agile Governance SurveySlide7
Comparing Agile and Traditional Approaches to Governing of Agile Teams (Scale: -10 to +10)
Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates
Decreases
Morale
Reduces
Quality
Wastes IT
Investment
Decreases
Productivity
Lightweight
Heavyweight
Improves
Productivity
Increases
Quality
Promotes Wise
IT
Investment
Improves
Morale
Agile
Traditional
Focused on
Business Value
Not focused on
Business Value
Source: 2017 Agile Governance SurveySlide8
Got Discipline?
Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates
DisciplinedAgileConsortium.orgDisciplinedAgileDelivery.comScottAmbler.comSlide9
About SA+A
Scott Ambler + Associates (SAA) is a IT management consulting firm that specializes in helping organizations adopt disciplined agile strategies, particularly at scale. We offer training, coaching, and transformation services.Our website is
ScottAmbler.com. We can help.Copyright 2017 Scott Ambler + Associates