PPT-Making Good Arguments

Writing and Research COMM 1312 Presented by Latifah Alabdulkarim 201103058 Muneera Alsulaim 200901016 Fatima Al Furaish 201200408 Nouf Al qahatani 201100868. of medical . decision-. making. . 1. :. . The . CREDO stack. John Fox . Department of Engineering Science . University of . Oxford . and OpenClinical. Thanks to …. Psychologists, Informatics/CS/AI. Validity and Soundness. The Form Content Distinction. Some students are athletes.. Some athletes are political.. Some students are political.. 1. Some young adults are in high school.. Some high school students are in the 10. . . Direct Realism . It is the pre-philosophical view : it is “common sense”. 2. Language implies that we perceive objects in the external physical world. . “I can see my friends, I can hear the traffic, I can taste the chicken, I can feel the wind in my face, and smell the exhaust fumes – I know I am in London”. (AND FILING BASICS). Filing basics . Many new debaters lose debates because they have misplaced parts of their files. Following these simple rules will really help:. Treat your files with respect. Do not lose pages.. A few tips on everyone’s favourite position.. Patronising stuff you will already know. Two main types of debate: policy and analysis.. In an analysis debate, there is no need to specify a mechanism (unless it is THBT X Country Should...)etc. The Reader. In reality, likely only one person will read your paper: me.. However, writing papers in class is supposed to be training you to write papers . for a general audience. . . Therefore you should write your paper as if people who don’t know you, have never been to this class, and do not know who I am are going to read it.. introduction. arguments. . An . argument. is a series of statements, one of which is offered as a statement to be supported, and the rest of which are offered as support.. A . conclusion. is a statement to be supported.. Russell X. Pollock. Bergstresser & Pollock LLC. 52 Temple Place. Boston, MA 02111. Closing Arguments. Why Close?. Not evidence. Jurors . have made up their . mind. Teach . your. jurors to . advocate. From . Teaching Argument Writing . by George Hillocks Jr.. English III. Arguments of Judgment. Arguments of judgment . attribute a quality or characteristic to a person, group, object, or concept. Examples may include speeches or writing that give praise or place blame.. . Structuring arguments. Defines which parts go where. Logical arguments described as:. Inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning:. Inductive reasoning. . Process of generalizing on the basis of a number of specific examples. Everything’s an Argument. Chapter 7. Factual arguments come in many varieties with different standards of proof . Turn to page 662 (beware, nudity and grossness…and David Beckham…appear). Read the article “When Did Skivvies Get Rated NC-17?”. Chapter 2. An argument is the fundamental building block of persuasion.. Chapter 2. Definition—. An argument is a collection of statements organized in a way that highlights connections between those ideas to demonstrate that because some of the statements in the collection are believed to be true, other statements in the collection should be accepted as true.. Powerpoint. What does an adjudicator do?. Decides which team, based on what they said during the debate, has overall convinced them that their side is more correct.. This is the sole criteria for winning a debate.. Developed by Jenny . Alme. , The . Harker. School. BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE. If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. . . You . need to prove that the affirmative is better than the status quo.