PPT-Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments
Author : alexa-scheidler | Published Date : 2015-12-04
Validity and Soundness The Form Content Distinction Some students are athletes Some athletes are political Some students are political 1 Some young adults are in
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments: Transcript
Validity and Soundness The Form Content Distinction Some students are athletes Some athletes are political Some students are political 1 Some young adults are in high school Some high school students are in the 10. In evaluating the relevance of a programme or a project it is useful to consider the following questions To what extent are the objectives of the programme still valid Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the overall goal Using Formal and Informal Language Appropriately. Everyday life is not like a Grey Poupon Commercial…. . Most of us remember the Grey Poupon commercials of the 90’s where a man in a limousine is asked for some fancy mustard and replies, “But, of course!” We all inherently know why the commercials are amusing, but we probably haven’t taken the time to actually analyze the reasoning.. ?. Common Arguments. Debate Preview?. Allen . Hainline. Reasonable Faith UTD. September 26, 2013. www.OriginsDiscussion.info. Let’s go out to eat with ASH after the debate. Outline. More Fine-Tuning discussion. Adam Crymble. Plan for Today. Background . lecture. Discussion of experience with digital archives. Workshop: evaluating a historical website. Time to start drafting blog post. Terminology. Archive. Evaluating Sources. Concepts You Will Learn:. Evaluating the condition of food. Repackaging food. Loading and distributing food safely. Which of . These Cans Should . be . Discarded. ?. Evaluating The Condition Of Food. . WITNESSING. AND . EVANGELISM. Lesson 12 for June 23, 2012. . The . Bible shows that we must evaluate (examine) ourselves, the Church members and the Church itself. Why is this evaluation necessary. . . Direct Realism . It is the pre-philosophical view : it is “common sense”. 2. Language implies that we perceive objects in the external physical world. . “I can see my friends, I can hear the traffic, I can taste the chicken, I can feel the wind in my face, and smell the exhaust fumes – I know I am in London”. Thomas . c.. Berg, university of . st.. Thomas school of law, . minnesota. . Background: issues & the legal framework. Issues: objections to facilitating abortion; maintaining standards re marriage/sexuality etc.. Writing for an Academic . A. udience.. Hosted by. English Writing Center. www.uta.edu/owl. uta-wci@uta.edu. A Division of the Department of English. Sponsored by the College of Liberal Arts . www.uta.edu/owl. Overview. What is science?. Science vs. pseudoscience. Scientific . method and . critique. How do we generate research ideas?. Ideas from theory. Ideas from other sources. How do we evaluate research ideas?. Everything’s an Argument. Chapter 7. Factual arguments come in many varieties with different standards of proof . Turn to page 662 (beware, nudity and grossness…and David Beckham…appear). Read the article “When Did Skivvies Get Rated NC-17?”. 7 – 8 “Develop . rigorous. . criteria for the product/outcome”. Criteria requirements. C. riteria used . to . self-assess . achievement of goal . later . in the . project. . R. eflect. . all . Chapter 2. An argument is the fundamental building block of persuasion.. Chapter 2. Definition—. An argument is a collection of statements organized in a way that highlights connections between those ideas to demonstrate that because some of the statements in the collection are believed to be true, other statements in the collection should be accepted as true.. Who stole Ms Choudhury’s stapler? It was last seen an hour ago in 1321. Was it Mr Smith? He always loses stationary and is a few doors apart . Was it Ms Cook ? Her long stapler is so heavy , Ms Choudhury’s Stapler is the right weight to staple exam papers!.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents