FACULTY MENTORING: Perceptions, Practices, Barriers & Benefits - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

FACULTY MENTORING:Perceptions, Practices, Barriers & Benefits

Rebecca Craft, Ph.D.craft@wsu.edu

Slide2

Background

Mentoring relationships in the workplace:Increase job satisfactionIncrease institutional commitmentIncrease rates of promotion and retention

Decrease work

conflict.

de

Janasz

& Sullivan, 2004; Moody, 2004; Neilson et al., 2001;

Tenenbaum

et al.,

2001

Slide3

BackgroundWomen faculty disproportionately benefit from mentoring (

Bilimoria et al., 2006; Chesler & Chesler, 2002).

Recruitment and retention of all faculty, especially women faculty

,

can be improved by

understanding:

the type(s) of mentoring that faculty

use,

what faculty

value in mentoring,

what

concerns they have about mentoring.

Slide4

Goal of WSU Faculty Mentoring Survey (Spring 2011)

Gather information from current faculty about:

existing forms of mentoring,

faculty perceptions of barriers and benefits to mentoring

,

important mentoring topics, etc.

Slide5

Faculty Mentoring Survey

SESRC administered online surveySent to 2,810 WSU

faculty

system-wide

all

ranks (tenured/tenure-track & non-tenure track)

2,700

eligible respondents

1,045 participants

>>

39%

response

rate

232 were

“

partials” (did

not report

some information, e.g., gender, or

skipped

questions).

Slide6

Demographic

Respondent category

Female

Male

Total

Tenure-track assistant

prof

66

77

143

Tenure-track associate

prof

75

82

157

Tenure-track

full

prof

58

121

179

Non-tenure track (clinical and research faculty)

96

100

196

Chair/unit dir/administrator

26

51

77

Slide7

TYPES OF FACULTY MENTORING

Slide8

Respondent

sub-group:

tt

faculty + chair/unit

dir

/admin

Slide9

Respondent sub-group: tt faculty + chair/unit dir/admin

Slide10

Respondent sub-group: non-tenure track faculty

Slide11

SATISFACTION WITH MENTORNIG

Slide12

Respondent sub-group: tenured/tenure-track faculty

Slide13

Respondent sub-group: tenured/tenure-track faculty (includes assist profs)

Slide14

Respondent sub-group: tenured/tenure-track faculty

Slide15

The Post-tenure VOID

“The biggest gap in our mentoring is that associates have NO conversations about promotion to full unless they raise it themselves and do so in one-on-one conversations with each Full Professor. We are given feedback every year until tenure and then there is a total vacuum of information and feedback…”

Slide16

Respondent sub-group: non-tenure track faculty

Slide17

Slide18

OTHER SOURCES OF MENTORING

Slide19

Slide20

Benefits From FACULTY MENTORING

Slide21

Slide22

Benefits of Mentoring

INCREASES SUCCESS: “…formal mentoring by a committee is crucial to success at WSU for tenure and promotion. I think it needs to be taken more seriously.”“…if mentors are willing to be up front and honest about the mentee’s progress in a constructive way the process can be quite helpful”

“Mentoring is critical for helping faculty…”

Slide23

Benefits of Mentoring

JUST & FAIR: “…this is not a guessing game or private club and there should be extremely clear guidelines for advancement for everyone…”“Actively mentored faculty will at the very least have the diversity of opinions from their mentors to add to their own opinions on what they need to do to succeed. How they manifest that into their progress remains to be seen, but at least having the information is better than not having it.”

Slide24

Benefits of Mentoring

OUR RESPONSIBILITY:“Mentoring is part of helping acculturate a new person into the academy. As professionals… we have an investment in people we hire and an obligation to ensure that they understand what is important and what is not for their success.”

Slide25

BARRIERS TO FACULTY MENTORING

Slide26

Slide27

Barriers to Mentoring

CONFLICTING ADVICE:

“…I’ve received conflicting advice” (from two different full professors in unit)

OUT-OF-DATE INFORMATION:

“It’s been a long time since any of the current senior faculty in my department went through tenure… I often wonder how useful [their] advice is as WSU culture has changed, the culture of our field of study has changed, the department is not the same one they were tenured in and they may or may not be involved in my tenure process when the time comes.”

Slide28

Barriers to MentoringAVOIDANCE OF BAD NEWS:

“…

We like to be nice and sometimes it’s hard to be frank with people. Mentoring is hard to do effectively

!”

FACULTY SQUABBLES:

“WSU needs to create a culture that mentoring junior faculty… must be a part of professional duties of senior faculty… The president and deans should make clear to department/unit chairs that unified collaborations from all parties on mentoring junior faculty must be on the top of internal politics/infighting and any unprofessional behavior on mentoring junior faculty will not be tolerated.”

Slide29

Barriers to Mentoring

MENTORING SKILLS AND WILLINGNESS: “Some attention needs to be paid to social skills and willingness of formally assigned mentors – not all are willing to look ahead to the future of the department, beyond their own research interests and advancement.”

Slide30

Barriers to Mentoring

INADEQUATE INCENTIVES:“…there’s no category in the [promotion] file for ‘mentoring.’ It’s an undervalued and unappreciated service obligation… So what if you’re a great mentor

?”

“Mentoring or any activity other than grants and publications has no value to university administration – there is no reward and no recognition for these activities.”

Slide31

Barriers to Mentoring

LACK OF COMMITMENT:“I hope this study is not aimed at proposing that we spend more time forcing people into mentoring relationships, and further away from personal responsibility. This is a strange era in which we live and at some point faculty members have to grow up and be responsible for their own actions instead of blaming their shortcomings on a lack of mentoring.”

Slide32

Barriers to Mentoring

GENDER & CAMPUS ISSUES:“Mentoring is tricky for women in male-dominated fields. Seeking it can be interpreted as a sign of weakness, the last thing we need.”“multi-campus system makes mentoring extremely difficult to accomplish”

“My experiences with Pullman faculty mentors was mixed” (from a regional campus faculty member)

Slide33

TOPICS FOR MENTORING

Slide34

Slide35

Characteristics of current mentorS

Slide36

Slide37

Slide38

SUMMARY

Slide39

Pre-tenure Faculty

The most common type of mentoring for pre-tenure faculty is a “formal tenure guidance committee

”.

~65% of assistant and associate professors are somewhat to very satisfied with available mentoring for pre-tenure

faculty

22

% are somewhat to very dissatisfied, with no significant gender differences

Slide40

Post-tenure FacultyN

o mentoring is provided for most post-tenure faculty members.Only 22% of associate professors are somewhat to very satisfied

48% are somewhat to very dissatisfied

Slide41

Non-tenure-track Faculty

No mentoring is provided for most non-tenure-track faculty members.Only 27-31% of non-tenure track faculty are somewhat to very satisfied.

49% of clinical-track faculty and 32% of research-track faculty are somewhat to very dissatisfied.

Slide42

Mentoring HelpsA large majority of faculty (~70-90%) agreed that there are many benefits to mentoring, while many fewer faculty agreed that there are barriers to mentoring.

Slide43

Mentoring Topics60-95% of faculty (depending on topic) rated the 12 mentoring topics listed as somewhat to very important.

A significantly greater % of women than men faculty rated 11 of 12 topics as somewhat to very important.

Slide44

Mentor CharacteristicsMost faculty

who have a current mentor (66% of men, 74% of women) somewhat or strongly agreed with 15 of 17 mentor characteristics.Women more strongly endorsed these characteristics than men.

Slide45

Conclusions and Recommendations

Slide46

Extend MentoringAssistant professors, who receive more formal mentoring than all other faculty, are the most satisfied with mentoring.

Implement (optional) mentoring for associate professors & non-tenure-track faculty

Slide47

Provide Checklists All faculty (especially women) value mentoring, and we know what topics and what mentor characteristics they most

value.Give a checklist

of mentoring topics/characteristics to assist

mentors.

Slide48

External MentorsMentors outside of the home institution are beneficial, particularly in providing discipline-specific, rather than

dept/institution-specific, career guidance.

Extend the ADVANCE External Mentor Grant Program to faculty in all units. The current program provides small grants for establishing an external mentoring relationship only to women in STEM disciplines.

Slide49

Choose Mentors Carefully

Some faculty are better mentors than others. Do not rely on a single

mentor. (Misdirection

less likely with greater diversity of

input.)

Ask mentee to identify possible mentors (increases likelihood of functional matches

)

Consider others

at WSU who are outside the unit/campus.

Slide50

Reward MentoringSome faculty

may be unwilling to serve.Do

not require service as mentor (to avoid reluctant and therefore

poor

guidance

).

Recognize/reward

service as mentor to faculty

colleagues.

Slide51

Procedural Suggestions – Department

Chair/director should meet periodically with all senior faculty to maintain consensus on unit tenure & promotion evaluation & guidelines.

Mentoring committees should resolve internal disagreements by discussing those disagreements with all senior faculty, the chair/director, and the dean if necessary.

Provide the correct information to the mentee.

Slide52

Procedural Suggestions – Committee

Before each meeting of a mentor and mentee:Mentee circulates c.v.

Mentee identifies topics that s/he wants to discuss (checklist).

M

entors examine mentee’s c.v.

Mentors identify topics that they want to discuss (checklist).

Slide53

We can improve faculty success and retention – especially of women – By improving faculty mentoring

craft@wsu.edu