/
Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics

Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics - PowerPoint Presentation

evadeshell
evadeshell . @evadeshell
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-25

Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics - PPT Presentation

Hao Zhang University of MarylandUniversity of LiverpoolCockcroft Institute Outline Introduction Motivation to Study Beam Halo Method Adaptive Method Using Digital Micromirror Device Experiment ID: 787543

halo beam mask dmd beam halo dmd mask core mirror method range dynamic stored 32mm micro adaptive pulse injected

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagn..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics

Hao

Zhang

University of Maryland/University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute

Slide2

Outline

Introduction

Motivation to Study Beam Halo

Method

Adaptive Method Using Digital Micro-mirror DeviceExperiment University of Maryland Electron Ring (UMER)JLAB FELInjection of SPEAR3 storage ring

2

Slide3

Beam Halo has many

negative

e

ffectsNuclear Activation of The Transport ChannelEmittance GrowthEmission of Secondary Electrons

Increasing Noise in The

Detectors

Halo Picture credit: Kishek, Stratakis

Motivation for Beam Halo Studies

3

Halo can be regarded as small fraction of particles out a well defined beam core.

Slide4

Solutions: 1) Passive spatial filtering, e.g. solar

corography

applied to beam imaging

by T.

Mitsuhashi of KEK DR = 106-107 achieved 2) Spectra-Cam CID , DR ~ 106 measured with laser by J. Egberts

, C.

Welsch

, T. Lefevre

and E. Bravin 3) Adaptive Mask based on Digital

Micromirror Array; DR ~ 10

5 measured with laser and 8 bit CCD camera by

Egberts

, Welsch

Problems: 1) Need High Dynamic Range ( DR >105 - 106) 2) Core Saturation with conventional CCD’s: blooming, possible damage 3) Diffraction and scattering associated with high core intensity contaminate halo 4) Adaptability when the beam core shape change.

Imaging Halos

4

Slide5

Digital Micro-mirror

arrayDevice

*

Micro-mirror architecture:

12

0

*DLP

TM

Texas

Instruments Inc.

45

0

5

Mirror size: 13.68 um x 13.68 um

Resolution

: 1024 X 768 pixels

Slide6

Computer

Mirror

Source

Halo Light

Core Light

DMD

Camera Sensor

L3

L4

L1

L2

Computer

Camera Sensor

L3

Mirror

Source

L1

DMD

L2

L4

Image 2

Image 1

Mask

Adaptive Method for Halo Measurement

6

32mm

Slide7

Quadrupole

Screen

Energy (

keV

)

10

Pulse width

(ns)

100

Repetitive rate (Hz)

20-60

Beam current (

mA

)

0.6 ,

6, 21,80

UMER Experiment

7

Slide8

Testing filtering ability of DMD

8

Beam on, DMD all on

Beam on, DMD all off

32mm

Average readout of the core region

49616

21

Slide9

20

275

1000

2000

3000

Integration Frames:

Dynamic Range Test of DMD with intense beam and circular mask*

9

Integration Frames:

32mm

Slide10

Circular Mask Data line profile

10

0

1

32mm

Slide11

70

280

x

y

(a)

(b)

I

Q

640

660

250

45

45

60

82.9%I

Q

66.3%I

Q

49.7%I

Q

Quadrupole

Current

32mm

Demonstration of Adaptive Masking on UMER

11

Slide12

Bending Magnet

Energy

135

MeV

Macro pulse width:

1 ms

Repetitive rate:

60 Hz

Micro-pulse repetition rate :

4.68 MHz

Charge:

60 pc/micro pulse

Halo Experiment with OSR in

JLab

FEL

12

Beam pipe

Slide13

1

1.2 s

No mask

X

y

4 mm

4 mm

Integration Time

3

5

2

4

6

2.2 s

1.5 s

4 s

80 s

25000

5000

35000

15000

2000

Mask Level

Masking OSR Image of JLAB FEL Beam

13

14 s

Slide14

Measurement of Dynamic Range for OSR DMD System

14

10

0

10

-2

10

-4

10

-6

Normalized Counts

pixel

Slide15

DMA/DMD Configuration

M=4

M=1

M=0.14

Slide16

More Details…

Mechanical Shutter

(5ms)

Diffraction pattern

1000x1000 DMD

Filter wheel

f=+125mm

f=+100mm, 2”

dia

Scheinflug

angle

Slide17

9.6m

M1=0.138

M2=3.55

DMD

M3=1

M = M1*M2*M3 = 0.4

7.14m

f=+2m

f=+125mm

f=+100mm

Aperture &

Cold finger

24°

PiMax

Filter wheel

OSR

Source

Injector

READOUT

Gate

Injected beam

Stored beam

SPEAR3

D

ata

acquisition

BTS

Slide18

PSF measurement of the stored beam

2 ms shutter mode

Increase the mask size by changing the intensity threshold level

ND filter from ND =5 to ND = 0

ND 5

ND 4

ND 3

ND 2

ND 1

ND 0

Mask

18 mm

No Mask

Slide19

Injected beam with presence of stored beam with different currents

(a)

(b)

6.11

mA

3.05

mA

1.52

mA

0.42

mA

Current /bunch

Stored beam

Injected

beam

18 mm

Slide20

Three matching condition by altering the quads in the BTS

Slide21

Evolution of Beam

centroid

and beam size

Slide22

Conclusion

Applied a adaptive optics to detect small image signals from either beam halo or Injected beam compared with beam core or stored beam.

Achieve a high dynamic range with this method.

Slide23

Discussion

How can we apply this method to other existing machines?

What is the limitation of dynamic range?

For Proton machine, since the beam is destructive, are there any usable screens?