/
Patty Broers Research Coordination Patty Broers Research Coordination

Patty Broers Research Coordination - PowerPoint Presentation

festivehippo
festivehippo . @festivehippo
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-17

Patty Broers Research Coordination - PPT Presentation

Unit Chief Evaluation and Performance Review The most serious mistakes are not being made because of wrong answers The truly dangerous thing is asking the wrong question Peter Drucker ID: 780379

evaluation research implementation panel research evaluation panel implementation review semi deliverables idot annual trp ict quarterly report technical project

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Patty Broers Research Coordination" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Patty BroersResearch CoordinationUnit Chief

Slide2

Evaluation and Performance Review

Slide3

“The most serious mistakes are not being made because of wrong answers. The truly dangerous thing is asking the wrong question.” Peter Drucker

“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions than their results.”

Milton Friedman

“True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information.”

Winston Churchill

Points to Ponder

Slide4

Contract Research

Organizational Structure

David Lippert

Engineer of Materials and Physical Research

Amy Schutzbach

Engineer of Physical Research

Research Coordination Unit

Patty Broers - Research Coordination Manager

Tom Bukowski – Graduate Public Service Intern (GPSI)

Slide5

ICT Administrative Structure

Slide6

Quarterly reportsIDOT approval of subcontractors

IDOT approval of work plans/budgets before work can begin

Interim deliverables and final report

Semi-annual evaluations – TRP/PI

Intergovernmental Agreement Requirements

Slide7

Research Problem Statement

Semi-annual solicitation

Slide8

Key Element: IDOT Sponsor/Champion

Slide9

Key Element: Clearly Identify Benefit to IDOT

Slide10

IDOT’s ICT Executive Committee Organizational Structure

Traffic/Roadside

Public/Intermodal

Transportation

Environment

TAG’s

as

appropriate

BMPR

Executive Committee Members – Directors of Offices/Divisions within IDOT, one member from FHWA, ICT Director

Structures

and Bridges

Safety

Planning

Construction

Pavement & Materials

Slide11

Determine research needs:Review and/or create problem statementsPrioritize/recommend to executive committee

Appoints technical review panel to oversee funded research

Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Activities

Slide12

Evaluate RFP submittals and select researcherProvide technical expertiseDevelop an implementation plan

Communication

Review quarterly progress reports

Evaluation – semi-annual and close-out

Champion implementation of research findings when possibleTechnical Research Panel (TRP) Activities

Slide13

Required for each projectPlan should identify: Needs and benefits

Primary panel members to oversee research

Ad hoc members as project progresses needed to promote implementation

Interim deliverables

Necessity for upper management close-out

Implementation Plan

Slide14

Developing Evaluation Tools

Slide15

RFP Evaluation Oversight panel evaluates

:

Research team

Proposal approach

Strengths/WeaknessesEquipment/Facilities

Slide16

Project Dashboardhttp://ict.illinois.edu/IDOTprojects.asp

Connected to web-based quarterly reports

Slide17

Quarterly Report

Web-based

Automatic notifications

TRP chair

comments

Slide18

Principal Investigator Evaluation

Deliverables, communication, and timeliness

“Needs Improvement” justification

PIs similarly evaluate TRP

Slide19

Principal Investigator Evaluation of Oversight Panel

Panel Evaluation

:

Good

communicationClear objectivesTimely

report review

Slide20

Series of questions by e-mailRate success of research (1–low to 5–high)Explain results expected and deliverables received

If applicable, describe what was not accomplished

Indicate implementation actions taken

Improvements that could be made in the future regarding similar research

Close-out Evaluation

Slide21

Administrative Performance Evaluation

Evaluate

:

Timeliness

ResponsivenessCommunicationProblem resolution

Slide22

Monthly meetingsMinutes that include action itemsKey issues:

Project meeting issues

Discuss semi-annual evaluations

Budget concerns

Investigator selectionAdministrative Meetings

Slide23

Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum

The Lincoln Family

Illinois Old Capitol Building