/
1 Context Sensitive Solutions 1 Context Sensitive Solutions

1 Context Sensitive Solutions - PowerPoint Presentation

giovanna-bartolotta
giovanna-bartolotta . @giovanna-bartolotta
Follow
414 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-27

1 Context Sensitive Solutions - PPT Presentation

For Designing Urban Thoroughfares Brian Bochner Senior Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute 2 Communities Want Flexibility Compatibility with adjacent land uses Balanced land usetransportation functions ID: 422321

design css context thoroughfare css design thoroughfare context fhwa source land criteria transportation approach physical community public amp ite

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1 Context Sensitive Solutions" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

1

Context Sensitive SolutionsFor DesigningUrban Thoroughfares

Brian BochnerSenior Research EngineerTexas Transportation InstituteSlide2

2

Communities Want:

FlexibilityCompatibility with adjacent land usesBalanced land use/transportation functionsSafe and attractive streets

Multimodal facilities

Quality public street

space

Improve mobility

Improve safety

Meet environmental requirementsPursue low maintenanceSpend cost-effectively

Agencies

Typically Start To:Slide3

CSS Defined

3

CSS is

Collaborative

Interdisciplinary

Involves

all stakeholders

Resulting facilityFits its physical settingPreserves scenic, aesthetic, historic, and environmental resources

Ma

intains

safety and mobilitySlide4

4

Tenets of CSSBalance SafetyMobility

Community objectivesEnvironmentMultimodal Involve public, stakeholdersInterdisciplinary teamsFlexibility in designIncorporate aesthetics

Source: Minnesota Department of TransportationSlide5

Context Integration

5

Baldwin Street, HoustonSlide6

Context Integration

6

Gray and Bagby Streets, HoustonSlide7

7

CSS: Bringing Place and Thoroughfare Design Together

E14th Corridor - San Leandro, CA Source: Community, Design + ArchitectureSlide8

8

CSS: Bringing Place and Thoroughfare Design Together

E14th Corridor - San Leandro, CA Source: Community, Design + ArchitectureSlide9

9

CSS: Bringing Place and Thoroughfare Design Together

E14th Corridor - San Leandro, CA Source: Community, Design + ArchitectureSlide10

Challenges

10

Project

Design

Safety

Physical Character

Cost

Environmental Quality

Natural & Human Environment

Capacity

Accessibility

Multimodal

Considerations

Historical and Scenic CharacteristicsSlide11

CSS (Federal) Milestones

1997 – FHWA Flexibility in Highway Design1998 – “Thinking Beyond the Pavement” workshop2003 – CSS included in FHWA performance plan

2005 – CSS promoted in SAFETEA-LU2006 – ITE/CNU/FHWA/EPA CSS in Designing Major Urban Thoroughfares for Walkable Communities2009 – TxDOT adopts ITE CSS report into project development process ITE/CNU/FHWA/EPA manual2010 – ITE/CNU/FHWA/EPA Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach

11Slide12

What is CSS?

12

More than mitigation . . .More than public meetings…More than enhancements . . .More than a fad . . .

Michigan DOTSlide13

What is CSS?

ProcessShared visionCollaborationComprehensive understanding of contexts

Flexibility and creativity to fit conditionsInterdisciplinaryCoordinated multimodal transportation and land use decisions13Slide14

Why Use CSS?

14

Listen

Build

Design

This

Decide

Design

Defend

Re-Design

Delay

Not thisSlide15

CSS Benefit

15Slide16

16

Vision and Goals

Long-range vision

C

ommunity

values and issues

Community and agency priorities

Educate stakeholders on issues, process and constraints

Establish planning process

CSS Start to Plan and DesignSlide17

17

CSS Design Process

Area PlanVisionCompatibilityInitial concept/testing

DesignSlide18

18

CSS Design FrameworkFunctional classification

Context zones:Suburbs - downtownsStreet classification:

Thoroughfare

type

Compatibility & mutual supportSlide19

19

Context Zones – An Organizing System for Thoroughfare Design

Source: Duany Plater-Zyberk and CompanySlide20

20

Features That Create ContextLand use

ActivitiesSite design Building designLandscape designNatural featuresCharacter of public spaceSlide21

21

CSS Tenet –Thoroughfare Design Changes as Context Changes

“Thoroughfare design is not just sensitive to context—but part of the context and helps define the place”Slide22

22

CSS vs. Conventional Thoroughfare Design Approach

Conventional

CSS Approach

Context:

Urban

Rural

Context:

Suburban

General urban

Urban Center

Urban Core

Design criteria primarily based on:

Functional class

Design speed

Travel demand

Level of service

Design criteria primarily based on:

Community objectives

Functional class

Thoroughfare type

Adjacent land useSlide23

23

Thoroughfare TypesThree roadway classifications:

BoulevardAvenueStreetBasis for: Physical configuration

Design criteria

Street

Boulevard

AvenueSlide24

24

Thoroughfare Type in DesignDesign criteria Target speed (desirable operating speed)

Physical configurationWith surrounding contextDimensions for: StreetsideTraveled wayIntersectionsSlide25

25

Thoroughfare Components

-

Streetside

StreetsideSlide26

26

Walkable Thoroughfare Design Parameters

Starting PointsSlide27

27

Streetside Design Criteria

Starting PointsSlide28

28

Key Differences From Conventional ApproachStart with area objectives

YoursStakeholdersConsider

Context

Land use

Activity

Thoroughfare function

Thoroughfare type

Continue to consider comprehensive objectivesRemember - FlexibilitySlide29

29

I-30/I-35W Interchange ReconstructionDowntown Ft. Worth

ExampleSlide30

30

ProjectExisting elevated freeway over Lancaster Avenue

ProjectReconstructionCapacity and safety improvementsSlide31

31

Initial PlanInitial plan – west leg

Widened elevated structureCommunity reactionOpposition

Lawsuit

Leadership interest to find better solutionSlide32

32

CSS Approach – Stakeholder ObjectivesObjectives/concerns

Replace aging structureIncrease interchange capacityIncrease safetyMerges, weavesDesign speed

Sight distances

Improve aesthetics

Freeway

Barrier

Historic preservation

Permit T&P building revitalizationRedevelopmentSlide33

33

ApproachInitial alternatives

Existing alignmentElevatedAt-gradeDepressedNew alignments

Visualization of preferred alternative (SDH&PT, FHWA, 1991)Slide34

34

Relocated I-30 West LegSlide35

35

Improved RampsSlide36

36

Lancaster AvenueSlide37

37

DiscussionSlide38

38

For Additional InformationBrian Bochner

Texas Transportation Institute(979) 458-3516b-bochner@tamu.edu