PPT-A Pseudo-Dynamic Rupture Model Generator for Earthquakes on

Daniel Trugman July 2013 2D RoughFault Dynamic Simulations Homogenous background stress complex fault geometry heterogeneity in tractions Eliminates important source of uncertainty fault geometry is a direct observable. ed. ) Spin on Renewal Models . Karen Felzer. USGS Pasadena. The time-predictable renewal model. Two key predictions:. 1) There is a minimum wait time before a fault patch is eligible for re-rupture.. tial of a fault commonly is evaluated from estimates of fault rupture parameters that are, in turn, related to earthquake magnitude. It has been known for some time that earthquake magnitude may be co Xun. Jiao. *. , Yu Jiang. +. , . Abbas. . Rahimi. $. , and Rajesh K. Gupta. *. *. University of California, San Diego. +. Tsinghua. University. $. University of California, Berkeley. Agenda. Motivation. Matthieu Wyart. Institute for theoretical physics, EPFL. Jie. Lin, Thomas . Gueudre. , . Alaa. . Saade. , . Edan. . Lerner, Alberto . Rosso. ,. Markus Muller. Lin et al, EPL, 105. ,. 26003 (2014). : December 1811, January 1812, February 1812 . Eastern U.S. earthquakes less frequent, but more widely felt. Crust is older and transmits stress. Intraplate Earthquakes. Earthquake Size and Characteristics. Tariff Administration, . August 2017. Purpose of . pseudo-tie procedure. Implement pseudo-ties in a reliable and compliant manner. Work with all stakeholders on necessary agreements and compensation. Kara Kruse. Richard Ward. Jim Nutaro. Barbara Beckerman . Computational Sciences and Engineering Division . Oak Ridge, Tennessee. December 10, 2007. Computational Biomedical Engineering. and Systems Biology. TELEDYNE AAQMS Systems. Analytical Instruments for AQMS. CO – GFC7001E. NO2 – 9110E. SO2 – 6400E. VOC – 4060. Ozone. – 400E. Particulate Matter (2.5 & 10) – Beta Ray Attenuation. Zero Air Generator – 701. Tariff Administration, . August 2017. Purpose of . pseudo-tie procedure. Implement pseudo-ties in a reliable and compliant manner. Work with all stakeholders on necessary agreements and compensation. Cryptography Lecture 6 Clicker quiz Let G(x) = x || parity(x). Which of the following proves that G is not a pseudorandom generator? G is not expanding Consider the following distinguisher D: D(y) outputs 1 Morphotectonics. III. . Determining the time evolution of fault slip. 1- Techniques to monitor fault slip. 2- EQs phenomenology. 3- Slow EQs phenomenology. 4- . Paleoseismology. . 5- . Paleogeodesy. Date Time(hour:min.) Latitude*(deg.) Longitude*(deg.) Depth*(km) Mj* (Nm) (strike, dip, rake)**(deg.) Main shock2005/03/2010:53N 33.738E 130.1757.80E+18 (122, 87, Aftershock2005/04/2006:11N 33.677E 1 Lovett (IAS). Coding, Complexity and . Sparsity. workshop. August 2011. Overview. Pseudo-randomness – what? why?. Concrete examples. Local independence. Expander graphs. Small space computations. Arianne Petley-Ragan. 1,*. , . Ben-Zion, Y.. 2. , . Austrheim. , H.. 1. , . Ildefonse. , B.. 3. , Renard, F.. 1,4. and Jamtveit, B.. 1. 1. Physics of Geological Processes, The . Njord. Centre, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.