PPT-Feedback & Evaluation

School of Engineering Oulu amp Raahe Campus How did you experience the Teacher Exchange Week Feedback in 4 groups about what went well and what didnt go well or could be improved . for Clustered Wireless Sensor Networks. 1. Presented by: Ting Hua. Author. s: . Xiaoyong Li, Feng Zhou, and Junping Du. Outline. 2. Motivation. C. lustered WSN . M. odel. Lightweight Scheme for Trust Decision-Making. EVALUATIONS . 2. BEHIND-THE-WHEEL EVALUATIONS. Observation, Measurement, and Documentation. Types of skills evaluated. Feedback . Types . of . evaluations. Etiquette. Evaluation forms. 3. EVALUATION ELEMENTS. Overview. Performance Evaluation. Our mission today. Why annual performance evaluation?. What is part of the evaluation?. UF . process. Evaluation best practices and giving feedback . – Tips. Where . EVALUATIONS . 2. BEHIND-THE-WHEEL EVALUATIONS. Observation, Measurement, and Documentation. Types of skills evaluated. Feedback . Types . of . evaluations. Etiquette. Evaluation forms. 3. EVALUATION ELEMENTS. (Formative assessment). HE in FE. Abstract. The aim of this project was to use Action Research and the Whitehead cycle to enable students to value feedback and use it to develop in their work.. The rationale came from students not progressing in assignments and not using feedback to move forward and develop. . Principles and Guidelines, Tips and Tricks. Office of Research and Sponsored Programs. Why are we asking you to do this?. Because you work most closely with the GSCs. Because the best person to evaluate performance of an employee is the person who knows the job and the job expectations the best and who works with that employee most closely.. Denis . Parkinson & . Dr. Stephen McKinnell. School of Health Sciences. Overview. Why use e-marking and feedback. The School of Health Sciences 2013-14 pilot. Demonstration. Questions and Answers. Creative Execution and Improvement. Take a Minute. . When you think about feedback, what’s the biggest challenge?. “We can’t just . tra. -la-la down the road of life ignoring what others have to say, safely sealed in our emotional Ziploc.” . Self evaluation. Navel gazing. Self evaluation. Whole School. Department. Pupil. Staff. Whole School . – informing the S.D.P.. Kirkland Rowell Survey. Staff (55). Pupils (649). Parents (458). BOG & SMT Quality Assurance. Making A Better Sandwich. Your Name . Here. Organization. Objectives. Reviewed importance of feedback. Defined . feedback . vs. evaluation. Identified . barriers . to . feedback . Identified ingredients . Creative Execution and Improvement. Take a Minute. . When you think about feedback, what’s the biggest challenge?. “We can’t just . tra. -la-la down the road of life ignoring what others have to say, safely sealed in our emotional Ziploc.” . Using the OPWDD DSP Core Competencies and NADSP Code of Ethics. Presented by:. Perry . Samowitz. . Lead for Region 3 Regional Centers for Workforce Transformation. John Raffaele . NADSP Training Consultant. What’s New with Online . IDEA Course Evaluations?. Reports available 3 days after grades are due for the session, term, or semester.. Reports will now include student comments. Survey items reduced from 47 to 43 items. How to Evaluate Direct Support Professionals Using the OPWDD DSP Core Competencies and NADSP Code of Ethics Presented by: Perry Samowitz Lead for Region 3 Regional Centers for Workforce Transformation